.
It could be a complication of using the HyperDB plugin, but it appears that on line 104 of wp-includes/ms-settings.php when the db is down get_blog_details() obviously fails and wp-includes/ms-load.php:ms_not_installed() is called. Unfortunately ms_not_installed() does not redirect to db-error.php, and instead dies, returning
$title = /*WP_I18N_FATAL_ERROR*/'Error establishing database connection'/*/WP_I18N_FATAL_ERROR*/;
Obviously i could hack in a call to wp-includes/functions.php: dead_db() in ms-load.php, but i try to avoid any core hacking to make upgrades easier.
Does anyone have a suggestion for overriding this behavior cleanly? perhaps something in wp-WP_CONTENT_DIR/sunrise.php ?
I suppose if somebody else is interested in the simple fix, here it is. In ""function ms_not_installed"" on line 224 of wp-includes/ms-load.php, insert dead_db();
like this...
{{{
function ms_not_installed() {
dead_db(); //hacked this in so we can get use our custom db-error.php
}}}
The bottom line is that now the visitor will potentially see a more friendly error message when the db or db table is unavailable.",tmuka
Awaiting Review,21910,wpmu_create_user() standardization,,Multisite,3.0,normal,minor,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2012-09-17T18:03:24Z,2012-09-17T23:36:26Z,"There seems to be some inconsistencies between wpmu_create_user(), create_user(), and wp_insert_user(). The former two are wrappers, and do different things but potential to consolidate and clean up some old code.
Per Nacin:
>nacin: wpmu_create_user() should probably just go away.
>nacin: fairly useless function
>nacin: by default, it looks like wp_insert_user() would create a role-less user.
>nacin: as would wp_create_user()
Looking at wp_insert_user() it sets the default role if none is provided, where wpmu_create_user() would actually delete the default roles and caps.
Although, I'm not really sure there's a use case where you'd be using both the wpmu_new_user and user_register hooks simultaneously so possibly depreciate the former in favor of the latter.
One real issue with wpmu_create_user is that it returns false instead of the WP_Error object which is probably not desired since the error could be useful. The false return is used in wpmu_activate_signup() to either set the returned ID or create it's own WP_Error.
Lastly... documentation for create_user says it returns the ID, but it looks like it could potentially also return a WP_Error object. Didn't test, but possible documentation fix there.
",ryanduff
Awaiting Review,21584,Allow to create more networks,,Multisite,3.4.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,feature request,new,dev-feedback,2012-08-15T00:34:24Z,2013-01-17T23:38:47Z,"After creating a multisite installation allow users to create their own network of blogs.
",alexvorn2
Awaiting Review,20225,"Self-contain wp-includes/load.php, wp-includes/plugin.php",,Performance,3.3.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,feature request,new,,2012-03-13T10:50:01Z,2012-04-01T09:44:46Z,"I'm trying to write a high-performance plugin.
I still want the whole of WP to be used by the admins, and the main part of WP to still be used by most user workflows, but I want certain end users to instead be using an alternate controller, instead of /index.php, when they're doing certain things.
This new controller I'll write will use a couple of the core files, but skips most for the goal of increased performance. The proposed core files to re-use are:
* wp-includes/version.php
* wp-includes/load.php
* wp-includes/plugin.php
* wp-includes/wp-db.php
* wp-includes/class-wp-error.php
However, wp-includes/functions.php is a can of worms, that if I included, would require me to include many other files, and it spiders out from there.
What would be better is if the following functions that wp-includes/load.php and wp-includes/plugin.php require be moved into those files from the functions file. Specifically:
* wp_die()
* validate_file()
* stripslashes_deep()
* add_magic_quotes()
* _doing_it_wrong()
* trailingslashit()
If they aren't, I'll have to copy-paste them into my custom controller, maintaining separate versions of them (less than optimal).
Of course, this process still requires me to write my own simpler versions of many more complex functions:
* wp_cache_init()
* wp_cache_close()
* wp_get_active_network_plugins()
* is_blog_installed()
* get_option()
* update_option()
but that's completely acceptable.
Moving those first 6 functions from the functions file to the load and plugin files would not negatively affect core, but would positively affect plugin authors' abilities to write high-performance plugins.",scottconnerly
Awaiting Review,18523,Can't change page permalink if slug metabox is removed,,Permalinks,3.0,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2011-08-26T14:42:56Z,2013-04-12T06:32:49Z,"If the slug metabox is removed from the ""Edit Page"" page, it is not possible to change permalinks, using the edit permalink function at the top of the page.
Slug and other metaboxes are removed by the karma theme, in its admin/theme-functions.php (but only if 'ka_hidemetabox' in the wp_options table is 'true'):
{{{
remove_meta_box('slugdiv','page','normal');
}}}
Technically, without the slug box, the ""post_name"" field containing the new slug is not sent with the form data when you click the ""Update"" button.
I believe this is bug was introduced after version 3.1.3. ",dankod
Awaiting Review,17183,previous_comments_link and next_comments_link return wrong url with PATHINFO permalinks,,Permalinks,3.1.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2011-04-19T20:13:15Z,2011-08-04T21:26:32Z,"When using PATHINFO permalinks, previous_comments_link() and next_comments_link() return a wrong link, which renders paged comments useless.
Steps to reproduce:
Set permalinks to: /index.php/%post_id%/%postname%/
The functions return URLs similar to: /comments-page-1/#comments
This URL results in a file not found (if no rewrite rules are available, which should not be necessary if the PATHINFO permalink structure is used).
Expected URL: /index.php/comments-page-1/#comments
Manual opening the URL results in the expected/correct paged comments page.",FireMotion
Awaiting Review,18672,"Implement rel=""prev"" and rel=""next"" for archives",joostdevalk,Permalinks,3.3,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2011-09-15T12:37:23Z,2012-12-04T22:34:58Z,"As can be seen here:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/09/pagination-with-relnext-and-relprev.html
Google now uses rel=""prev"" and rel=""next"" to navigate paginated archives. As we already do a lot of these types of links (rel=""index"", rel=""start"" etc.) I think we should add these. I'll come up with a first version of a patch.",joostdevalk
Awaiting Review,20563,Add actions between sections in User Edit form,,Plugins,3.4,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2012-04-27T22:20:08Z,2012-06-12T23:45:44Z,"Currently there is only one hookable area in the User Edit to cleanly output additional fields: 'edit_user_profile' / 'show_user_profile'
I suggest we add another set just before each of the H3 tags on this page (/wp-admin/user-edit.php).
Above Personal Options:
{{{
}}}
Above Name:
{{{
}}}
Above Contact Info:
{{{
}}}
Above About:
{{{
}}}
For hooking into the save, I believe the existing action 'user_profile_update_errors' will suffice, though I'm not sure if that's the best name for having developers hook into for adding their own field and this runs after error checking.. So we could also add an action before error checking runs to allow for more extensibility to modify existing fields being saved there (letting you still use WP built-in error handling).
This would be added around line 130 in /wp-admin/includes/user.php:
{{{
// Allow plugins to modify user fields before error handling
do_action_ref_array( 'user_profile_update', array ( &$user, $update ) );
$errors = new WP_Error();
}}}",sc0ttkclark
Awaiting Review,23616,General Handler for Whitelisted Options' Submissions,,Plugins,,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,feature request,new,,2013-02-26T03:06:55Z,2013-02-26T03:09:09Z,"As stated over on #18285 WordPress should move away from posting to options.php. In order to do that, the Settings API needs a general purpose function that can be safely called on all Settings Pages that can handle posts to itself (generally referred to as 'take_action' in various places) and can handle what options.php currently does.",WraithKenny
Awaiting Review,22029,Install multiple plugins,,Plugins,3.5,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,feature request,new,,2012-09-28T00:44:34Z,2013-04-09T08:51:32Z,"The new favourite plugins list is very welcome. On this list, or in general, I would like to be able to install several selected plugins.
The use case is for site admins, pretty much the same use case as for the new favourites list. That featured would be really useful if one could install many plugins at a time, as one can upgrade many selected plugins at a time.
The use case when searching in other categories of plugins is not so obvious. It could be a special feature for the favourites list, or it could be available on all kinds of plugin search results.",knutsp
Awaiting Review,19721,WordPress should support multiple or nested plugin directories,scottnath,Plugins,3.3,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,feature request,new,,2012-01-03T16:33:34Z,2012-10-22T11:12:11Z,"WordPress currently only looks one directory deep for the plugin files. This is a limitation in get_plugins. It should look at least two (or more).
Our setup: We have many sites on WordPress and would like to share a set of plugins across them. However, we also have a requirement where each site should have its own unique set of plugins as well. (I realize this seems like an easy job for Multisite or mu=plugins, but they're not something we can adopt currently for various reasons).
Ideally, we can create a symlink (or external/submodule) to our shared plugins folder from inside the core plugins folder and have WordPress recognize plugins within that folder:
* plugins Folder
* hello-dolly.php
* akismet
* akismet.php
* shared-plugins (symlink)
* shared-plugins folder
* hello-dolly-enhanced
* hello-dolly-enhanced.php
* akismet-enhanced
* akismet-enhanced.php
Currently, WordPress will ignore both hello-dolly-enhanced and akismet-enhanced.
Themes already support nested folder; plugins should too please!
Thanks,
Scott Nath",scottnath
Awaiting Review,24137,CPT as a submenu item does not get the correct classes when adding new,,Post Types,3.5.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2013-04-19T15:25:44Z,2013-05-11T00:32:28Z,"When registering a post type as a submenu of another post type, the submenu item does not get high lighted correctly when adding a new item to the post type (the one that is a sub menu).
The post.php and edit.php screens work fine for the submenu post type; it is only post-new.php does that doesn't highlight correctly.
This is similar to #19125 and #22022, but not quite the same.
I think I've tracked the issue down to `get_plugin_page_hookname()` and the `$_registered_pages` global.
The submenu post type key in $`_registered_pages` is (for example)
`download_page_edit?post_type=edd_volume_discount`
but the one retrieved by `get_plugin_page_hookname( ""post-new.php?post_type=$post_type"", $post_type_object->show_in_menu )` is
`download_page_post-new?post_type=edd_volume_discount`.
It appears the `$_registered_pages` global doesn't include (at least for submenu CPTs) `post-new`, only `edit`.",mordauk
Awaiting Review,20571,problems with slug and view in custom post types,,Post Types,3.3.1,normal,minor,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2012-04-29T23:27:56Z,2012-04-30T06:39:19Z,"when creating custom post type, there are 2 minor problems
1. when setting rewrite to false, it is not possible to edit slug (edit button missing) - this is wrong as slug is needed e.g. for get_post queries by name
2. if the post is set '''not''' publicly_queryable, then anyway the post edit screen shows ""View [custom post name]"" and ""Preview"" button, which then points to 404 screen. ",thomask
Awaiting Review,23207,Add $labels argument to register_post_status(),,Post Types,3.0,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2013-01-15T19:32:54Z,2013-03-08T22:59:14Z,"WordPress functions '''register_taxonomy()''' and '''register_post_type()''' has '''labels''' argument. Why not add labels to '''register_post_status()'''?
The current way to add status:
{{{
$args = array(
'label' => __( 'draft', 'text_domain' ),
'label_count' => _n_noop( 'Draft (%s)', 'Drafts (%s)', 'text_domain' ),
'public' => false,
'show_in_admin_all_list' => true,
'show_in_admin_status_list' => true,
'exclude_from_search' => true,
);
register_post_status( 'draft', $args );
}}}
The new way (using labels):
{{{
$labels = array(
'name' => __( 'Draft', 'text_domain' ),
'singular_count' => __( 'Draft (%s)', 'text_domain' ),
'plural_count' => __( 'Drafts (%s)', 'text_domain' ),
'any_other_label' => __( 'Any Other Label', 'text_domain' )
);
$args = array(
'labels' => $labels,
'public' => false,
'show_in_admin_all_list' => true,
'show_in_admin_status_list' => true,
'exclude_from_search' => true,
);
register_post_status( 'draft', $args );
}}}",ramiy
Awaiting Review,23309,Not all WP_Query::query_vars get updated during WP_Query::get_posts(),,Query,,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2013-01-28T15:40:56Z,2013-01-28T19:51:54Z,"There is a lot of logic within the WP_Query::get_posts() method that fills in missing query vars with defaults and manipulates others based on the rest of the query. However, some of the final states for many of the variables aren't updated in the WP_Query::query_vars array. For example, the post type is lost as a local variable and post_status is used for building compiling mysql expressions, but never directly updated.
The result is that any plugins that want to recreate the query for another system, (ie, an external search provider) must directly copy much of the business logic that WP_Query::get_posts() has embedded in it in order to fill in for the incomplete query_var array.
",prettyboymp
Awaiting Review,19392,Add auto-suggest support for all flat taxonomies in Bulk Edit.,,Quick/Bulk Edit,3.0,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,early,2011-11-29T18:37:18Z,2011-11-29T18:58:48Z,"Auto-suggest in the Bulk Edit area for post_tag's was fixed in 3.3. Let's add support for all other non-hierarchy tax's in 3.4.
See [http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/19176#comment:11 #19176] for more info.",scottbasgaard
Awaiting Review,19343,Allow Quick Edit to be Disabled for Custom Post Types,,Quick/Bulk Edit,3.3,normal,trivial,Awaiting Review,feature request,new,,2011-11-23T19:41:02Z,2012-11-22T03:17:16Z,"For some custom post types, quick edit doesn't make sense, and it's not easy to disable the quick edit code. You can use CSS to hide it but that still requires the code to be sent to the browser when it's not even needed.
The only other solution is to extend the ''WP_Posts_List_Table'' class and set the ''inline_edit()'' function to return nothing. Something like this:
{{{
if(!class_exists('WP_List_Table')) {
require_once(ABSPATH . 'wp-admin/includes/class-wp-list-table.php');
}
if(!class_exists('WP_Posts_List_Table')) {
require_once(ABSPATH . 'wp-admin/includes/class-wp-posts-list-table.php');
}
class My_Posts_List_Table extends WP_Posts_List_Table {
function inline_edit(){}
}
function my_admin_head() {
$wp_list_table = new My_Posts_List_Table();
$wp_list_table->prepare_items();
}
add_action('admin_head-edit.php', 'my_admin_head');
}}}
Clearly, that is a lot of code to accomplish something so simple.
So, it would be nice if there was some way to disable quick edit. Maybe it could be a feature you could disable via the ""''supports''"" option when you register the custom post type?",Jick
Awaiting Review,20520,Author Page Pagination Broken,,Rewrite Rules,3.3.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2012-04-23T04:16:03Z,2012-04-23T04:37:44Z,"WP 3.3.1 Multisite
Permalink setup: /author/post-name
- If the request is ""domain.com/authorname"" the authors page pagination link is broken.
- If the request is ""domain.com/author/authorname"" the authors page pagination link works fine.",rbaccaro
Awaiting Review,16832,Trouble if the slug of a custom taxonomy is the same as the url of page/post,,Rewrite Rules,3.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2011-03-11T11:50:43Z,2011-09-29T23:26:24Z,"I got some troubles with the 3.1 version of WordPress concerning the slug of custom taxonomy.
'''An example that work in 3.0.5'''[[BR]]
www.example.com/agency (url of a page)[[BR]]
www.example.com/agency/john-smith (url of a custom type's detail)
Apparently having the same ""folder"" 'agency' only works for one or the other url but not both.
Hope I made myself clear.",LucasHantz
Awaiting Review,19493,post and archive pagination don't work with custom endpoints,,Rewrite Rules,2.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2011-12-09T23:55:09Z,2012-04-02T20:54:52Z,"Archive pagination and post pagination are not endpoint-aware, so they break when endpoints are added to them.
The following example code creates an endpoint, and then uses a filter to add that endpoint to various links on the rendered page:
{{{
add_action( 'init', function() {
global $wp_rewrite;
add_rewrite_endpoint( 'foo', EP_ALL );
$wp_rewrite->flush_rules(false);
} );
add_filter( 'post_link', 'gist_add_endpoint_to_url', 99 );
add_filter( 'get_pagenum_link', 'gist_add_endpoint_to_url', 99 );
function gist_add_endpoint_to_url( $url_base ) {
$endpoint = 'foo';
$url_parts = parse_url( $url_base );
$url = ( isset($url_parts['scheme']) && isset($url_parts['host']) ) ? $url_parts['scheme'] . '://' . $url_parts['host'] : '';
$url .= isset($url_parts['path']) ? $url_parts['path'] : '';
$url = user_trailingslashit( $url );
if ( '' === get_option('permalink_structure') ) {
$url .= isset($url_parts['query']) ? '?' . $url_parts['query'] : '';
$url = add_query_arg( $endpoint, 'true', $url );
} else {
$url .= $endpoint . '/true';
$url = user_trailingslashit( $url );
$url .= isset($url_parts['query']) ? '?' . $url_parts['query'] : '';
}
$url .= isset($url_parts['fragment']) ? '#' . $url_parts['fragment'] : '';
return $url;
}
}}}
You'll see that it works perfectly using the theme unit test, except that paginated posts produce URLs like this:
http://example.com/2008/09/layout-test/foo/true/2/
...which doesn't work. The inverse -- http://example.com/2008/09/layout-test/2/foo/true/ -- also doesn't work, and produces a 404 on top of it.
Also, the older posts / newer posts produce this format of link:
http://example.com/page/2/foo/true/
.. .which also doesn't work.
If you change gist_add_endpoint_to_url() to add a querystring param, older posts/newer posts links work fine, but post pagination still breaks:
{{{
function gist_add_endpoint_to_url( $url_base ) {
$endpoint = 'foo';
$url_base = add_query_arg( $endpoint, 'true', $url_base );
return $url_base;
}
}}}
If you don't use a permalink structure at all, it works fine, since the pagination params are passed directly in the URL.
I'm not sure if the fix lies in modifying add_rewrite_endpoint() so that it creates pagination urls in wp_rewrite, or modifying the way _wp_link_page() and get_next_posts_link() work. ",mintindeed
Awaiting Review,21425,the 'edit_users' capability also allows 'promote_users',,Role/Capability,3.4.1,normal,major,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,dev-feedback,2012-07-30T17:07:52Z,2012-09-22T10:11:33Z,"Hello all,
I have found an issue where I have created a Support role in order to have a user make changes to basic user information. What I noticed was that the capability 'edit_users' allows said User (role) to promote users to any role - including admin! I tried removing the cap 'promote_users' and it does nothing.
add_role(
'support',
'Support',
array(
'read' => true,
'edit_feedback' => true,
'edit_others_feedback' => true,
'list_users' => true,
'edit_users' => true
)
);",ew_holmes
Awaiting Review,23635,get_objects_in_term - identify matching terms,,Taxonomy,3.5.1,normal,minor,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2013-02-26T21:29:54Z,2013-02-26T21:29:54Z,"`get_objects_in_term` is great for viewing taxonomy relationships for non-posts. However the return value is too limited for certain use cases. For When fetching object_ids for multiple terms the return value doesn't inform as to the matching term.
For instance this query:
{{{
#!php
$object_ids = get_objects_in_term(array(55, 66, 77, 88, 99), ""my_custom_taxonomy"");
}}}
Might return an array of object_ids as follows:
{{{
#!php
array(101, 202, 303, 404);
}}}
However there's no way to tell '''which''' term a particular object_id matched. Did object 101 match term 77? Or maybe it was term 99? Or both?
I've created a modified version of `get_objects_in_term` which will addresses this issue. I'll submit a patch, but am wondering if there's another way to achieve this functionality. ",leepowers
Awaiting Review,18023,No way to define default page template,,Template,3.2,normal,major,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2011-07-07T06:15:24Z,2011-07-08T17:59:26Z,"The twenty eleven theme is quite nice but there is no way to define the default page template. For a website that needs a sidebar on every single page it is a hasle to have to set (and not forget to doit) the page template to sidebar.
",Gecka
Awaiting Review,20413,edit_post_link() have not an equivalant without echo,,Template,3.3.1,normal,minor,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2012-04-10T21:16:59Z,2012-04-10T21:16:59Z,"Hello,
The function edit_post_link() (in link-template.php) have not a get_edit_post_link() function which returns what is displayed by edit_post_link().
It exists a function get_edit_post_link() but it returns the '''url''' of the link. Not the link (with
}}}
How translator could put the edit_post_link before ""Filed under:..."" with just *.po file ?",leblogdudeveloppeur
Awaiting Review,18791,Add custom post type support for Author Template functions,,Template,3.2.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2011-09-27T12:32:48Z,2011-09-27T19:58:40Z,"Functions defined in `wp-includes/author-template.php` assumes that post type == post. It will be good to enhance them so they will be able to work with specified post type.
At first sight following functions will need update:
{{{
get_the_author_link()
the_author_link()
get_the_author_posts()
the_author_posts()
the_author_posts_link()
get_author_posts_url()
wp_list_authors()
}}}
I suspect there will be other updates needed, to support new `post_type` argument added to author's url.",sirzooro
Awaiting Review,18676,"Allow headers, footers, and sidebars to be located inside of subfolders",,Template,3.3,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2011-09-15T21:38:08Z,2013-02-07T21:50:09Z,"Now that `get_header()`, `get_sidebar()`, and `get_footer()` use `get_template_part()` (see #18331), we should add subfolder support once #15086 goes in.
This is especially useful for sidebars.",Viper007Bond
Awaiting Review,18780,"The caption ""Comment author must fill out name and e-mail"" is ambiguous",gabrielhtc,Text Changes,,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2011-09-26T14:46:14Z,2013-02-15T13:38:47Z,"
== Observation ==
Users tend to think that if they uncheck that option, the name and email fields will not be displayed.
== Problem ==
The caption ""Comment author must fill out name and e-mail "" in the ""Other comment settings"" of the Discussion settings is ambiguous.
== What is expected ==
With the current caption, users expect that the name and email fields aren't shown.
== What happens instead ==
The name and email fields are still displayed, but they are now optional instead of being required. Some of the themes do not explain whether the fields are required or optional, so the users think that unchecking the option has no effect.
== Solutions ==
* Changing the caption to a less ambiguous one such as: ""Name and email is optional for guests comments""
* Make sure that the themes show clearly which field is required or not to be able to post the comment.",gabrielhtc
Awaiting Review,22805,Add a hook for the live theme preview event,,Themes,3.4.2,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2012-12-07T11:19:52Z,2013-01-17T23:42:52Z,"We have a hook for theme activation and deactivation, but for the theme live preview - not...
",alexvorn2
Awaiting Review,16883,"Add check for ""Template Version"" on theme activation",,Themes,3.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2011-03-18T03:28:36Z,2011-10-19T18:15:47Z,"Related: #16395
In addition to adding Template Version to the standard meta information extracted from style.css in `get_theme_data()`, I think that for this information to be useful, a child theme shouldn't be able to be activated unless the template template the child theme uses (parent theme) meets the minimum version requirement identified in ""Template Version"".
A polite and graceful failure, with an error notice, would be preferable :-)
Reason: many times child themes utilize functionality that only exists in the latest version of a parent theme. They're stuck either writing backward compatibility into into their code, or risking whitescreens.
This not only prevents that, but it could be used to gently encourage the user to update the parent theme.
Certainly not a candidate for 3.1.1, but perhaps 3.2?",nathanrice
Awaiting Review,18959,Allow choosing multiple header images,,Themes,3.3,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2011-10-15T21:32:15Z,2012-06-25T16:01:02Z,"Please, see small screenshot :)
[[Image(http://trueimages.ru/img/0f/5b/b7cf5f11a2786fc804521503268.png)]]
Description: This is the theme TwentyEleven. I want choose multiple header images, (for example 4,5,6), but i cannot. Only random or only one. Thanks.",wikicms
Awaiting Review,19238,New approach for content navigation section in themes,,Themes,3.3,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,feature request,new,dev-feedback,2011-11-12T16:06:01Z,2011-11-12T16:06:01Z,"At this moment the only way to replace default content navigation in theme (previous/next posts links) is to manually edit theme files. Ticket #18585 allows to replace this section, but its scope is limited to Twentyeleven and its child themes.
Therefore I propose to introduce generic mechanism, which could be used by theme and plugin autors - e.g. add new `content_navigation_template()` theme tag. By default it should look for `navigation.php` file in theme directory and include it. There should be also a new filter, which could be used by child theme and plugin authors to provide alternate navigation section.",sirzooro
Awaiting Review,20978,Upload a theme like an image,,Themes,3.5,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,feature request,new,dev-feedback,2012-06-15T18:26:31Z,2012-12-15T16:45:15Z,"add option to drag zip files like images on 'theme-install' page, enable multiupload.",alexvorn2
Awaiting Review,23110,"Tiny MCE - when adding blockquote, entering twice no longer backs out of blockquote",,TinyMCE,3.5,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2013-01-03T16:48:00Z,2013-01-03T19:47:08Z,"When using the visual editor you used to press enter twice to back out of a blockquote and continue writing paragraphs, but now it just adds a nbsp; in the blockquote. Without going into the html view and actually adding content below, there's no way to get out of writing in the blockquote. ",jack.nycz
Awaiting Review,18134,"TinyMCE messes up text when its ""caption"" contains only a space",,TinyMCE,3.2.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2011-07-15T19:58:23Z,2012-09-09T16:32:03Z,"1.) Have a long text [[BR]]
2.) Insert an image inside there with no link pointing anywhere and a caption that contains only a space [[BR]]
3.) Make some -s, numbered lists etc after that [[BR]]
4.) Insert a new image with full size also, and a caption with only a space. [[BR]]
After this everything is messed up. The whole text before the second image becomes the caption of the first image and the second image disappears.",szotsaki
Awaiting Review,22660,"Admin bar in multisite: mobile tap on ""My Sites"" dropdown in back-end doesn't work",,Toolbar,3.4.2,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2012-11-30T20:40:17Z,2012-12-21T00:33:39Z,"Quick steps here to reproduce an issue where the ""My Sites"" dropdown (multisite networks) will drop down and show the ""Network Admin"" link and the list of your sites. But, clicking on a site (to expand and see ""Dashboard"", ""New Post"", etc.) does not happen. Tapping the blog name just closes the dropdown.
I'm not sure what's different but I can consistently reproduce this when in the admin back-end (but works OK on front-end admin bar when viewing a site):
From /wp-admin/ on a mobile device (tested on iOS 6, iPhone 5, iPad) with a multisite network:
1. Tap ""My Sites"" in admin bar
2. See ""Network Admin"" and list of sites below
3. Tap one one of the site names
Expected: Site name expands to show ""Dashboard"", ""New Post"", etc. (same behavior as front-end when viewing site). Screenshot: http://d.pr/i/reOi
Actual: Tapping site name simply closes the ""My Sites"" dropdown, does not browse anywhere nor expand menu",devinreams
Awaiting Review,17999,Failure to Update Notification Persists After Manual Upgrade,,Upgrade/Install,3.2,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2011-07-05T20:30:08Z,2013-01-13T16:42:27Z,"This has been around for a few versions. When an update fails, if the user updates or upgrades manually and WordPress lists the updated version in the Administration Panels, the failure to update notification persists.
I've sat through four or five updates with the failure notice on every panel, including WordPress 3.2, on several sites.",Lorelle
Awaiting Review,22076,WP Upgrader: update_bulk_plugins_complete_actions and update_bulk_theme_complete_actions should pass information about all plugins/themes to the filter,,Upgrade/Install,3.0,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2012-10-02T07:56:19Z,2012-10-05T23:10:07Z,"In class-wp-upgrader.php, line 1214 there is this line:
{{{
$update_actions = apply_filters('update_plugin_complete_actions', $update_actions, $this->plugin);
}}}
When adding a filter to it like this:
{{{
add_filter('update_bulk_plugins_complete_actions','test_filter',99,2);
function test_filter( $update_actions, $plugins ) {
echo print_r( $plugins, 1);
return $update_actions;
}
}}}
Only the last updated plugin info will be printed. However, it should contain information about all the plugins that were updated (since we are dealing with a bulk upgrade here).",ragulka
Awaiting Review,16492,Improvements to the Wordpress Update Process,,Upgrade/Install,3.0.5,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2011-02-08T16:45:48Z,2011-07-17T21:54:10Z,"I've some suggestions on how to improve the update process (usability). I guess its not enough for separate tickets so I'm filing them together.
* When updating Wordpress, a plugin or a theme, I'm being asked for the password to the FTP server. You should add a note there that the password won't be stored in the database. I guess many/some users are uncomfortable with storing their FTP password in the database and won't use the ""update tool"" for this reason.
* Rename the button ""Update Automatically"" to ""Update Wordpress"". ""Update Automatically"" sound like ""Update now and update automatically in the future when a new Wordpress (and also plugin/theme?) version is available."" This should make the button's function a little bit clearer.
",manski
Awaiting Review,20947,"feature request: one-click update for core, themes and plugins (all in one)",,Upgrade/Install,,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,feature request,new,dev-feedback,2012-06-13T22:48:50Z,2012-06-13T22:49:28Z,"I'd love to have the one-click update be truly one-click so that you can click once and update core, themes and plugins all at once as opposed to having to initiate three different updates.",jkudish
Awaiting Review,17547,Image upload issues - Size reported as 0x0,,Upload,3.1.2,normal,critical,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,dev-feedback,2011-05-24T08:27:21Z,2012-05-16T17:35:28Z,"When I upload any image of any size to my wordpress installation the image uploads fine, but the size is reported as 0x0 and has only one option of inserting it as a full-sized image!
Further inspection of this issue has led me to believe that it lays with wordpress not inserting the correct (if any) meta data for the attachment into the database.
As you can see in the image below, the meta data is present and this image shows all options of inserting the image in the post at all sizes specified in the WordPress media settings panel.
http://www.millerswebsite.co.uk/images/meta%20data.jpg
But as you can clearly see from the image below, when the meta data is missing it shows you can't post the image at any size except full which is stated as 0x0px - Clearly something is wrong!
http://www.millerswebsite.co.uk/images/no%20size.jpg
Many people have had and are still having this issue since 2.5. There are quite a few forum threads relating to it with not a single word from anyone from WordPress.
Several tickets have been submitted to the WordPress Trac system with the issues going unresolved. This is a major problem and many people have reported it, yet nothing seems to have been done.
Sources :
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/12532
http://wordpress.org/support/topic/cant-adjust-media-file-size-since-upgrading-to-27
http://wordpress.org/support/topic/images-upload-fine-but-wp-shows-0x0-size
http://wordpress.org/support/topic/add-image-size-only-allows-fullsize-with-0x0-dimensions
http://wordpress.org/support/topic/image-upload-in-wp-28-with-translation
If any solution exists to this problem, please let me know, I have been searching for weeks now to no avail. When I talk about solutions, I do not mean using plugins to ""regenerate thumbnails""! Yes I know this works, but it does not solve the problem as its only a temporary fix. Plus it needs to regenerate the images every time you upload a new image.
Side note :
I have tried a completely new installation of WordPress with and with out plugins on a completely different database. I have uploaded and re-uploaded the WordPress files also.
This is the type of image I am uploading. I took it on my Nikon D3100 and compressed to 80% @ 960x768 which makes it 83KB so it's not exceeding any upload limits and I am still having problems.
http://www.millerswebsite.co.uk/images/wordpress/DSC_2165.jpg
My host claims it is not their fault and they have recompiled apache and php for me, the php memory limit is also set to 128mb and file upload size is limited to 8mb.
A phpinfo() can be seen here : http://www.millerswebsite.co.uk/info.php
My original complaint can be seen on the forums here : http://wordpress.org/support/topic/image-upload-issues-size-reported-as-0x0?replies=10",David_Miller
Awaiting Review,19227,clicking the pinkynail/title in the media-upload.php library tab does not show the full media info.,,Upload,3.3,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2011-11-10T20:30:35Z,2011-11-10T20:31:40Z,"I am using the latest nightly build.
I am not sure if this is supposed to work this way, but it does have the 'toggle' class and UX wise it should I think.
Steps to reproduce:
1: Open a post/create a new post
2: Click the Upload/insert media button.
3: in the media iframe click 'Media Library'
4: Click on an 'pinkynail' or title in the list
Nothing happens. I would expect clicking the 'pinkynail' or title to activate the same 'toggle' as the 'show' link does as we read left to right, our eyes are drawn to the image and we are generally choosing an image here, so our instinct is to click that. Plus this is how it works in the 'full' (i.e. non-iframe) version. It could also do with css to make the cursor 'pointer'.
Tested in latest versions of Chrome and Firefox in Windows 7",davidosullivan
Awaiting Review,22993,Admin - users without a role are difficult to find,,Users,3.5,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2012-12-18T17:32:21Z,2012-12-20T06:21:38Z,"There doesn't appear to be a filter to display users *without* a role (see the screenshot). The ideal solution would be to add a filter for ""None"".
[http://i.imgur.com/3S5pH.png]",logikal16
Awaiting Review,16788,Ampersands in e-mail address become invalid,,Users,3.0.5,normal,major,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,dev-feedback,2011-03-07T20:01:38Z,2012-09-19T17:46:32Z,"When an e-mail address contains an ampersand, WordPress improperly escapes the ampersand invalidating the e-mail address.
Example: h&f@domain.com becomes h&@domain.com
First of all, the proper HTML entity for ""&"" is '''&'''. Where did the extra '''amp''' come from?
Also, an ampersand is a valid character in an e-mail address and should not be escaped. Escaping it could be a completely different e-mail address.
I have not dug into the code to find out where this is happening but I'd assume in '''sanitize_email()'''.",jfarthing84
Awaiting Review,17370,Screen options and meta box settings can lose per-blog meta box positions,,Users,3.1.2,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2011-05-10T21:13:37Z,2011-08-04T21:13:59Z,"User preferences for admin interface appearance of the Dashboard and the Edit/Add New pages are stored in per-user options in wp_usermeta: closedpostboxes_$page, metaboxhidden_$page, meta-box-order_$page, and screen_layout_$page, where $page is one of 'post', 'page', or 'dashboard'. Users can customize the order of the Dashboard and editing meta boxes to better suit their workflow using the drag-and-drop AJAX interface to move the meta boxes into ordered columns and the Screen Options tab to show and hide the boxes. Many plugins add custom meta boxes to the Edit/Add New Post page.
In a multisite installation, with different plugins active on different blogs, users who rearrange an Add New Post page on a blog with a custom meta box and then rearrange it on a different blog without that meta box will lose the position of the custom meta box. Blogs can have different features and workflows implemented, and having per user options for the appearance instead of per user, per blog options limits the ability of a user to customize the interface.
The expected behavior for moving things around is that it changes on one blog, not on all blogs.",jmdodd
Awaiting Review,17326,Allow new user registrations to be moderated,,Users,3.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2011-05-05T04:29:10Z,2011-05-05T16:02:57Z,"'''Summary'''
When registration is open, have the option to require manual approval of user accounts before they are granted default role status.
'''Details / Suggested Implementation'''
Create a new user role (""Moderated""?) which for all intents and purposes is the same as ""Subscriber"" (`read` capabilities).
If opted into, user moderation would assign new users this new role. Administrators would be able to see these users listed under the Users list and click an approve link which would change their role to the default user role (as per the General Settings).
This would also make it easier for plugins to implement private blogs while having open user registration.
See also: #12030",Viper007Bond
Awaiting Review,16860,"map_meta_cap use ""manage_network_users"" instead of is_super_admin for edit_users",,Users,,normal,minor,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2011-03-15T18:45:07Z,2011-03-15T20:54:07Z,"I find that for a multi-site setup, the ability to edit users is inconsistent. there is a capability called ""manage_network_users"", but this cap if given to ""regular"" admin's does not give them the power to edit users.
The current code in map_meta_cap in wp-includes/capabilities.php is:
{{{
case 'edit_users':
// If multisite these caps are allowed only for super admins.
if ( is_multisite() && !is_super_admin( $user_id ) )
$caps[] = 'do_not_allow';
}}}
removing any flexibility, I would suggest having this based on the ""manage_network_users"" capability, giving us much more flexibility in terms of assigning power to control user administration.",sboisvert
Awaiting Review,16698,Better Table field value upgrade check (minor),,Warnings/Notices,3.1,normal,minor,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,reporter-feedback,2011-02-28T10:31:06Z,2011-03-04T12:48:04Z,"line 1463 on /wp-admin/includes/upgrades.php is
{{{
preg_match(""|"".$tablefield->Field."" ([^ ]*( unsigned)?)|i"",$cfields[strtolower($tablefield->Field)], $matches);
$fieldtype = $matches[1];
}}}
There is no check IF a $matches is found. If there is no match found an error will be displayed 'undefined index 1'. An Error message could be added here.
Can happen : if the sql code contains no spaces between the fieldname and the type it will generate the not found [1].
",cogmios
Awaiting Review,21061,Can't drag an opened widget to other widget area,,Widgets,3.4,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,dev-feedback,2012-06-24T19:43:44Z,2012-06-24T19:43:44Z,"the placeholder does not appear and the option to drag the opened widget is not possible, to fix this: to auto-close the widget before drag event (sortable) or add option to accept opened widgets
http://wpimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Untitled-5.png",alexvorn2
Awaiting Review,21287,Fix Widgets Helper position on start event - sortable,,Widgets,3.4.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2012-07-16T09:33:24Z,2012-12-13T12:31:33Z,"the widget helper moves (jumpes) to the left, to the parent left position...
in Firefox this is not a bug but in chrome it does.
please take a look in the screenshot, the helper jumped to the left....
http://wpimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Untitled-2.png
I tried to use the :
{{{
ui.helper.css('left', ui.placeholder.position().left)
}}}
code but chrome does not set a placeholder position, I don't know why, maybe a chrome bug or in jQuery.
",alexvorn2
Awaiting Review,19846,"Specify 'primary' sidebar, so widgets land in correct sidebar when changing themes",,Widgets,3.3.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2012-01-16T21:49:42Z,2012-06-25T19:58:19Z,"With the improvements to widget handling in 3.3, the widgets in a previous theme's sidebar are transferred to your current theme's sidebar. But there's no way to specify which sidebar should receive them.
For example, when you activate the Genesis theme it has three widget areas:
- Header Right
- Primary Sidebar
- Secondary Sidebar
If you install a fresh copy of WP and then activate Genesis, the Header Right widget area is populated with the 6 default widgets ( http://twitpic.com/8618x5 ). It's definitely not ideal for new users unfamiliar with this.
It would be great if there were some way to specify a primary sidebar when registering it, and that's the one the default widgets flow into.
{{{
register_sidebar( array( 'name' => 'Primary Sidebar', 'id' => 'primary-sidebar', 'primary' => true );
register_sidebar( array( 'name' => 'Secondary Sidebar', 'id' => 'secondary-sidebar' );
// Default: 'primary' => false
}}}
There might be better ways to handle this, but I think it should be done in WP core. If it's up to the themes to solve, we'll have to use solutions like this: https://gist.github.com/1623202",billerickson
Awaiting Review,23909,Widgets Settings Loaded When No-Needed,,Widgets,3.5.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2013-03-30T16:02:05Z,2013-04-03T19:21:32Z,"Hi, This ticket about the performance in the back-end interface .
WordPress run query to get the active widgets settings in every page even in the dashboard ! , This makes the site admin slow especially when the site have many widgets !
You can use '''Debug Bar''' & '''Debug Bar Extender''' plugins to check the queries .",alex-ye
Awaiting Review,23423,sanitize_title() in dynamic_sidebar() restricts the use of specific characters for sidebar IDs,,Widgets,2.2,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2013-02-08T13:25:00Z,2013-02-19T05:20:42Z,"In the dynamic_sidebar() function in wp-includes/widgets.php uses sanitize_title() on the given index when it looks for a sidebar with a name that matches the index. After that it leaves the index value sanitized making it impossible to use characters not allowed by sanitize_title() in a sidebar ID.
By not overwriting the given index value with the sanitized version it would still be possible to use any character for the ID. To achieve this, lines 847-853
{{{
$index = sanitize_title($index);
foreach ( (array) $wp_registered_sidebars as $key => $value ) {
if ( sanitize_title($value['name']) == $index ) {
$index = $key;
break;
}
}
}}}
should be replaced with
{{{
$sanitized_index = sanitize_title($index);
foreach ( (array) $wp_registered_sidebars as $key => $value ) {
if ( sanitize_title($value['name']) == $sanitized_index ) {
$index = $key;
break;
}
}
}}}",paulvandermeijs
Awaiting Review,18671,Allow themes to set default widgets,,Widgets,3.3,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2011-09-15T06:52:41Z,2012-09-16T13:24:25Z,"Rather than having to use a hard-coded fallback HTML sidebar, it'd be cool if a theme could set up default widgets.
#17979 will somewhat remove the need for this but it could still be useful.",Viper007Bond
Awaiting Review,16613,Extend Widget API to allow sidebar/widget manipulation,,Widgets,3.1,low,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2011-02-21T22:55:17Z,2013-01-21T17:27:26Z,"There is currently no easy way to add a widget to a sidebar using code. We should add methods of doing this.
A good example usage of such an API could be when a new theme is activated, it could add it's custom widgets to it's sidebar.
API should provide support for adding widget X to sidebar Y (or even just the first sidebar) along with setting some options for the widget and where in the sidebar to add it (top vs. bottom).",Viper007Bond
Awaiting Review,16581,Meta widget: properly redirect user after logging in / out,,Widgets,3.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2011-02-17T19:20:11Z,2011-02-18T02:11:07Z,"Inside Meta widget, there's a login link. However, the href attribute doesn't contain a redirection query argument.
So, there's a usability problem when someone is reading a post and want to comment, but can't because he's not logged in (and the blog requires logging in to comment). After logging in using the link inside Meta widget, the user is redirected to the admin area, instead of to the post he was reading. It would be a few clicks too many to go back to the post to comment.
The same thing can be applied to the Log out link (when the user's currently logged in). Instead of showing the blank `wp-login.php` form, he should be redirected back to the page where he clicked the link.",garyc40
Awaiting Review,20988,Open a closed sidebar box and enable droppable/sortable in it when you hover a draggable available widget over it,ldebrouwer,Widgets,3.4,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,enhancement,new,,2012-06-16T10:27:24Z,2012-06-16T11:00:29Z,"At the moment you have to explicitly open a sidebar box to allow it to except available widgets. In my humble opinion this is bad UX and the sidebar box should expand automatically when being hovered over with a draggable and it should accept the draggable to it's containing droppable/sortable as well.
The obstacles to overcome:
- Since the draggable in most cases overlaps the sidebar box when dragging over it ( unless you move really quickly ) it's hard to register a 'mouseenter'. This could be solved by setting the 'cursorAt' option for the draggable.
- Opening a sidebar box is trivial but activating the droppable/sortable only seems to kick in when the draggable has been released.",ldebrouwer
Awaiting Review,17382,XMLRPC wp_getUsersBlogs Scalability,,XML-RPC,3.0.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2011-05-11T20:32:15Z,2012-05-13T16:16:46Z,"If there is a root blog with many sub blogs on it and a user that is an admin on each sub blog, then when the when the XML RPC method wp_getUsersBlogs() is called it does not scale very well. My PHP memory_limit setting was 128MB, and the XML RPC request died when a user was a member of 230+ blogs. I noticed that the number of queries made to the database for a single user that has many blogs that they are an admin is very high.
Affected line: http://core.trac.wordpress.org/browser/tags/3.0.1/xmlrpc.php#L443
I don't know exactly how the code would have to change so I am not providing a patch.",bmorneau
Awaiting Review,17270,strip_tags function in XML RPC needs replacing with regex,,XML-RPC,3.1,normal,normal,Awaiting Review,defect (bug),new,,2011-04-28T16:32:46Z,2011-04-28T16:32:46Z,"I've been working on a plugin that works with pingbacks, and I have come across a problem with a line in class-wp-xmlrpc-server.php which uses strip_tags.
(line 3422 in WP 3.1):
$linea = strip_tags( $linea, '' ); // just keep the tag we need
For some reason this function is not working properly at all on some templates (or that is the way it seems) and instead of returning all the tags is cutting a lot of them out, making it seem to the server like there is no target link in the source URI, and thus returning a pingback fault 17 unnecessarily. And this means a large percentage of genuine pingbacks are failing without the user even knowing about it!
I suspect the function is having trouble with plugins that insert javascript near the header of the page, though it could be otherwise, as I have done a test to see what is left after this line is run, it returns some garbled javascript, no links at all from the post content (where the source links actually were), and then the menu links.
I have included a workaround in my new plugin:
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/pingchecker/
Basically it does a regex match for links in your content, then echoes them in a hidden div in the footer, making it much easier for the strip_tags function to actually find them. It works pretty well so I'm not fussed myself, but I thought it worth writing about..
This line really needs to be replaced with the regex match in the actual server code for future WordPress users too. I don't know regex myself, but I used sample code I found here (http://regexadvice.com/forums/thread/48395.aspx) for this regex expression, which seems to work really well.
In any case, strip_tags is not doing a reliable job at this and needs replacing. Hopefully this finds its way to the right person able to fix this. Thanks!",majick777
Future Releases,9698,WordPress back end is not accessible,,Accessibility,2.8,normal,major,Future Release,task (blessed),new,,2009-05-01T18:15:41Z,2012-02-20T20:50:25Z,"The WordPress back end violates several WCAG accessibility guidelines, so it cannot be considered accessible to people with disabilities.
Guidelines: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990505/
Not being an accessibility expert, I am not sure of all of the violations. But guideline 6.3 states ""Ensure that pages are usable when scripts, applets, or other programmatic objects are turned off or not supported. If this is not possible, provide equivalent information on an alternative accessible page.""
This means that you should be able to do all functions in the WP back end with JavaScript disabled.
As of 2.8-bleeding [11148], there are several things you cannot do with JavaScript disabled:
1) Upload and attach media to a post. You can upload media in the Media section, but the media upload section of the post edit screen is missing without JS, and I see no way to attach it to a post.
2) Add tags to a post or change which tags are on a post. The tags section is totally blank without JavaScript. (It could at least have the default plain-text field that is there behind the scenes and hidden).
",jhodgdon
Future Releases,13218,Allow to specify name of drop-in which is not a plugin,nacin,Administration,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reviewing,,2010-05-02T21:14:23Z,2011-04-07T03:49:48Z,"As I mentioned in #11861, plugin DB Cache Reloaded have two files: one main plugin file, and another used as `wp-content/db.php` drop-in. I would like to provide name for the drop-in file, but now the only way is to use the `Plugin Name:` header. Unfortunately when I do this, drop-in file bundled with plugin appears on plugin list. Therefore I need new header, which could I use to specify drop-in name, without that unwanted side effect.",sirzooro
Future Releases,10762,Bulk editing creates invalid URIs,,Administration,2.8.4,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),assigned,,2009-09-09T16:53:30Z,2013-05-12T10:27:16Z,They simply get too long for example if you move 999 posts to trash. It might be helpfull to switch to the post form method.,hakre
Future Releases,6342,"Rapidly spamming/deleting comments can break ""infinite river"" feature on comment moderation pages",mdawaffe,Administration,2.5,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2008-03-21T22:05:16Z,2011-12-14T13:18:06Z,"Comment moderation pages have an ""infinite river"" feature whereby when you remove one comment (spam/delete), it'll load a new one at the bottom. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to catch up if you click more rapidly than about once every 2 or 3 seconds, and you'll ""lose"" comments. At the end, you may just have one comment that, when dealt with, will be replaced by only one comment. This may have to do with doubleclicking the ""spam"" link, or maybe clicking the ""spam"" link of the next comment before the river action has finished.",markjaquith
Future Releases,17036,Theme editor shouldn't override root directory files with same names in child directories,,Administration,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2011-04-03T19:11:33Z,2012-06-27T10:23:07Z,"'''Steps to reproduce:'''
1. Create subdirectory: blogs
1. Create file in subdirectory: index.php
1. Try selecting Main Index Template in Theme Editor
Example is taken from BuddyPress' theme structure. `get_file_description()` doesn't account in any way for the presence of subdirectories since it uses `basename()`.",kawauso
Future Releases,7756,AJAX saving method instead of reloading the page,,Administration,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-09-16T17:36:44Z,2013-01-03T16:12:25Z,"Instead of using a traditional page refresh after saving a post, utilize AJAX, similar to how auto-saving already functions, to save the post.
this would help decrease the load on the server and enhance the user experience.",jdingman
Future Releases,7723,Allow filtering by author on Manage > Posts,,Administration,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,reopened,,2008-09-10T19:59:37Z,2011-12-19T18:04:36Z,"In versions of wp before 2.5 you could select an author from a dropdown on MANAGE > POSTS to see only posts owned by that author. This was very useful for quickly sorting posts and is absolutely necessary when you have editor users without the 'edit_users' capability, as unlike admin users (most of us) they don't have access to the 'users' tab and thus have no way to see the manage screen sorted by user. The manage screen sorts by user simply by adding ?&author=$id in the url, but for users without access to the 'users' tab, even author id's are innaccessible.
In the #wordpress-dev irc channel ryan boren expressed that the filter was removed because in some cases there were too many users in the system and the resulting dropdown was slowing down pageload time and ruining user experience. This is a paradox, because the more users your system has the more likely you are to need this filter.
Wordpress needs to support filtering by author somehow if it wants to be a serious multi-user platform. Our editors are pulling out their hair.
My personal opinion is that the dropdown select should be reinstated. Filters should be added to the list such that only users who can post are listed (other users have no use in the Manage > Posts screen), as well as to show only users with at least 1 post. This should avoid slowing down pages for installations where most users are 'subscribers', which would otherwise mean all open-registration blogs would have hugely long lists.
Given those two filters, I think that anyone who still has load-time problems should deal with their problem themselves using a plugin. It should be easy to remove the filter dropdown if you don't want it using a plugin, as well as to further filter the authors shown to reduce their number.
Any installation with that many users deserves the option of deciding if they want the pulldown or not, and I think many would choose to keep it even if there are problems because it is so incredibly useful in filtering through hundreds of users worth of posts.
(Consider: the full categories list is shown, even if there are hundreds, despite the fact that this has the same effect on performance as many authors does).
Also in IRC Matt M proposed that some kind of text box + ajax to predict which author you mean could be used for this purpose. I think that is a great idea but would take a lot more work than what I propose (the work for hte pulldown is already done and the old functions are still there, all that's needed is to add filtering and re-work it into edit.php). It could also be used in the 'Users' context for search though, so it could be worth the effort. ",jeremyclarke
Future Releases,7797,Consolidate iframe headers,,Administration,2.7,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-09-26T23:35:46Z,2012-10-30T16:40:45Z,"Currently iframes are being used in multiple locations (ie. thickbox, plugin re-activation, etc) and in each case, theres generally a function for the header and footer, or its inline.
What i suggest, Is to create a standard set of admin templates which print the headers out for the pages.
And a side suggestion:[[BR]]
As an added bonus, It should probably be possible to automatically detect if it was loaded via thickbox ($_GET[TB_iframe] shouldnt be set) and serve the correct header (ie. Full admin side menu if no thickbox)",DD32
Future Releases,9604,Edit screens expire,,Administration,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-04-21T06:35:08Z,2009-06-13T02:02:48Z,"Steps to reproduce:
1) Open an edit post (or page) screen
2) Take your browser offline for 24 hours
3) Put the browser back online
4) Edit the post, type a lengthy, thoughtful, dramatic entry
5) Click save draft / publish as you prefer
Expected result: Your poetic prose is committed to infallible digital memory.
Actual result: You're told ""Your attempt to edit blah has failed."" Press the back button and likely see the previous version of your post. Your latest prose exists now only in your memory.
Technical details: I think the nonce expires, so the post screen becomes invalid after a while.
Proposed solution: Add a javascript timeout to warn the user that the edit screen has expired. Provide a mechanism for the nonce to be updated.",chmac
Future Releases,16853,Error 500 when a user has too many sites,PeteMall*,Administration,3.0.1,normal,minor,Future Release,enhancement,accepted,,2011-03-14T11:15:57Z,2012-02-13T09:36:58Z,"'''My installation'''
[[BR]]
3.0.1 multi-site installation with more than 7500 blogs, with one user each. I also have one moderation user that can administer each of the blogs.
[[BR]]
[[BR]]
'''The issue'''
[[BR]]
In the admin interface, when I go to Super-Admin -> Users, and when I display the page that contains my moderation user, I get ""''An error (500 Internal Server Error) has occured in response to this request''"". The page tries to display all the sites administered by him (around 7500 of them), hence the error.
[[BR]]
[[BR]]
Updating to 3.1 didn't resolve the problem.
[[BR]]
[[BR]]
'''Recommended enhancement'''
[[BR]]
For each user in the list, display only a certain number of sites, with a possibility to see all of that user's sites, if needed.",luuzan@…
Future Releases,14515,Make admin table content filterable by column,sirzooro,Administration,3.0.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,assigned,,2010-08-03T06:16:40Z,2011-10-21T09:15:42Z,"I would like to modify Author column on post list - add link to user's profile. Now the only way is to add it to 1st column or custom column, and optionally move it later using JavaScript. Therefore I ask to add new actions for default columns, which will allow to do this.
It may be also beneficial to implement this as a general hook which will be called on all columns, including custom ones.",sirzooro
Future Releases,9117,Spam queue doesn't distinguish between filter sources,,Administration,2.7,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-02-12T22:50:51Z,2012-06-19T19:23:07Z,"1. On the Settings / Discussion tab, go to the Comment Blacklist box, and add the string ""the"".
2. Post a comment containing the word ""the"". It will be caught as spam.
3. Visit the Comments / Spam tab. Your comment is there, but there is nothing to indicate whether it was caught by the Comment Blacklist, or by Akismet, or by another spam filter.
Result: neither the user nor WordPress knows how to prevent that comment from being caught in future. Many users will forget about the Blacklist feature and assume their spam filter plugin is faulty.
Suggested fix: comments caught as spam should record the reason. This should be displayed to the user, and used internally by spam filter plugins to decide how to handle false positives.
",tellyworth
Future Releases,19123,Top and bottom pagination should be consistent,,Administration,3.3,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-11-03T02:39:23Z,2012-12-24T11:45:33Z,"The top pagination on Install Themes and Install Plugins is the new style (box to type in page number), but for some reason the bottom pagination is old style. These should be consistent. IIRC, the bottom ones were reverted because there was a bug we couldn't solve in time for that version's launch, but we never came back to fix it. Both top and bottom should allow text entry of page number.",jane
Future Releases,20013,Clean Up Touch UI for Left NavMenu / Flyouts,,Administration,3.3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,reporter-feedback,2012-02-10T16:30:50Z,2013-01-22T15:24:19Z,"While the flyout is mostly usable in it’s current state, it is not as intuitive as it needs to be for the best user experience. They are ineffective at best on the Kindle Fire’s Silk Browser, but work pretty well on the iPad. We need to examine all target devices to ensure interactivity is supported cross-device.",georgestephanis
Future Releases,13516,Hide JS-only widgets on dashboard is no JS,,Administration,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2010-05-24T13:16:42Z,2011-12-24T16:16:41Z,"We hide screen options and help; we should also hide these widgets instead of displaying by default with the 'you need JS' message. Affected modules: QuickPress, Incoming Links, Plugins, WordPress Development Blog, Other WordPress News.
We should display an additional module for no-JS people that lets them know that their WordPress install would be even more awesome with JavaScript, and list out some of the features they would gain access to with JS enabled. ",jane
Future Releases,20729,Improve Admin Colors CSS enqueuing,,Appearance,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,early,2012-05-22T17:19:58Z,2012-05-22T17:20:17Z,"The hacky way in which we enqueue the admin colors css means that you get different ordering of the CSS between the development version of the scripts and the script-loader sourced version of the scripts.
This can cause CSS bugs which don't show when developing but do when running with the script loader - e.g. #16827
It also makes it harder to implement a custom css concatenator.
We should do something like - http://core.trac.wordpress.org/attachment/ticket/16827/colors-hacked-fixed.diff
To make this properly enqueue the styles.
We should also make this kind of call fire a {{{_doing_it_wrong()}}} as {{{true}}} is not a url :)
{{{
$styles->add( 'colors', true, array('wp-admin') );
}}}
This code harks back from [7976]",westi
Future Releases,20859,Theme Installer: Preview should be scrollable on iPad and Kindle Fire,,Appearance,3.4,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2012-06-06T21:51:09Z,2012-06-08T21:10:27Z,"Related to #20805. We've added techniques for smoothly scrolling iframes when they're the only frame on the page, but the theme installer still uses the overlay technique.
We may be able to iron this out in a similar fashion. Given that the old installer also used an overlay technique, this is not a regression.",koopersmith
Future Releases,7301,AtomPub interface should accept new categories provided by clients,josephscott,AtomPub,2.6,normal,normal,WordPress.org,enhancement,reopened,,2008-07-15T04:54:22Z,2012-10-31T16:25:19Z,"The AtomPub interface successfully exposes access to the existing categories of a particular blog, via the URL:
http://[myblog]/wp-app.php/categories
But the category listing is identified as ""fixed"", and this pans out. When a client attempts to provide a category term with a name that has not been seen before, the interface just ignores it.
It would be a nice enhancement to change the category collection to an editable one, and support provision of arbitrary new category names on supplied posts to the wp-app interface.
As it is now, there is no way to add categories via the AtomPub interface.
",redsweater
Future Releases,9513,Wordpress should allow input of XHTML/HTML via Atompub,josephscott,AtomPub,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-04-11T23:38:51Z,2011-03-14T09:50:06Z,"One of the intended purposes of Atom standard was to allow better way of including XHTML in the feed than with “escaping it” (see this [http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/08/20/embedded.html article by Norman Walsh in xml.com] with followup at [http://norman.walsh.name/2003/06/30/hardline 1], [http://norman.walsh.name/2003/09/18/unescmarkup 2], and [http://norman.walsh.name/2003/09/16/escmarkup 3], there is also [http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/1571.html an interesting discussion under this blogpost] and [http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/06/28/Learning Tim Bray’s essay on the same theme]) Even though even [http://norman.walsh.name/2003/09/16/escmarkup#comment0006 Norm agrees that he lost this fight], at least Atom provides ''opportunity'' for conscious authors to use namespaced XML properly.
Now, of course, the problem is that all this beauty is not supported by any known-to-me Atompub-accepting blog server. Particularly when this perfectly valid Atom 1.0 feed (take a look at [http://validator.w3.org/feed/#validate_by_input validator] if you don’t believe me):
{{{
Late Night Thoughts on Listening to Mahler’s Ninth Symphony
2009-04-08T00:13:32+02:00
Matěj Cepl
ceplm@seznam.cz
http://matejcepltest.wordpress.com/
Copyright 2007 Matej Cepl
John 3:17 or The Golden Middle Ground Between Grace and Sanctification?
urn:mc:ceplovi.cz:atom1:blog:jan-3_17-2008-07-10
2008-07-13T00:00:00+02:00
John 3:17 or The Golden Middle Ground Between Grace and Sanctification?
There is a couple of things, which make for me sense together
(and I am not sure, of course, whether they will make sense to you
as well), and which I would like to record here.
“For God sent not his
Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world
through him might be saved.” (J. 3:17) In some aspects and for some
people (like me) and in certain moments, this is even more important
than the previous verse, and yet it is quite rarely mentioned in the
Church. Maybe because it so clear, that nobody gets much fame to explain
(and there is not much to explain here?). For all of us, who live with
the idea of God-policeman, following our doings to punish severely any
small misstep, this is the good news.
There is quite certainly something significantly wrong about preaching,
that we always quote only (John 3:16) and
we don’t continue one verse further. As if we are still more interested in what’s
there in gospel for me, and we don’t understand, that we are not the central figures
in whole Bible. Not that there wouldn’t be anything there for us, but … that’s another long
discussion I would like to have with Dave.
}}}
is sent to Wordpress.com I get [http://matejcepltest.wordpress.com/2009/04/08/john-317-or-the-golden-middle-ground-between-grace-and-sanctification/ rather disasterous result].
According to [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.wordpress.devel/27067 Peter Westwood] wordpress treats all content delivered by different modes of remote publishing as the same dummy plain text.
OK, so the request of this ticket (and hopefully place of further discsussion if necessary) is to fix this and make considererd and delivered so that wordpress would just accept the nodetree inside of such element as a body of the blogpost without much further changes.
Also #6128 might be caused by this.",mcepl
Future Releases,4965,Blog by Email: any images and attachments in your email are not being posted inline,westi,Blog by Email,2.3,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2007-09-12T18:15:29Z,2009-10-11T21:07:33Z,"Blog by Email: any images and attachments in your email are not being posted inline
Remaining issue from #4829.",foolswisdom
Future Releases,18734,Subcategory archive does work with any name as parent category in URL,,Canonical,3.0.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,needs-unit-tests,2011-09-21T15:10:46Z,2012-10-22T23:10:00Z,"Parent category is ''parentcategory'' and his sub category is ''subcategory''.
The URL will be ''domain.com/category/parentcategory/subcategory''.
The problem is, that you will get the same page if you use any words as ''parentcategory''.
Examples:
- ''domain.com/category/xxx/subcategory''
- ''domain.com/category/subcategory''
- ''domain.com/category/foo/bar/subcategory''
IMO {{{redirect_canonical}}} should do his work here (and sometimes it does).
In 3.1 it does redirect.
In 3.1.4 it doesn't redirect; after r17549.
In 3.2.1 it doesn't redirect.
Duck_ found that it does redirect before r18079.
In current trunk it doesn't redirect.
",ocean90
Future Releases,11856,URL for 1st comments page is not canonical,markjaquith,Canonical,3.0,normal,major,Future Release,defect (bug),new,reporter-feedback,2010-01-10T19:17:42Z,2011-12-22T01:55:08Z,"When WP generates URL for comments, it always includes comments page number. It should not do this when URL is for 1st comments page - in this case post URL is sufficient.
WP should also redirect to canonical URL version when someone will try to load URL like site.com/some-post/comment-page-1.",sirzooro
Future Releases,11738,sanitize_text_field() issue with UTF-8 characters,hakre,Charset,2.9.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-01-06T07:39:11Z,2010-11-13T07:36:00Z,"See Description #11528
Suggested patch does not take UTF-8 properly into account. Function has been degraded in the commit(s) [12499], [12501] to not support shift-spaces any longer. Details about preg_replace and UTF-8 as well as a proper suggestion to fix w/o degration [https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/11528#comment:10 here].",hakre
Future Releases,12363,Comment permalink wrong when only listing one comment type,,Comments,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,dev-feedback,2010-02-24T14:31:51Z,2010-11-13T07:46:50Z,"If you pass the `type` parameter to `wp_list_comments()` (for example, to show comments only and no pings), then comment permalinks can easily use the wrong page number as they expect there to be pings included. This is apparent after leaving a comment and WordPress attempts to redirect back to your new comment.
At first I was thinking you could tell WordPress that you're filtering to a type and it could compensate when determining the page number, but then I realized perhaps it'd just be better for `wp_list_comments()` to check if there were 0 comments returned for the query and if so, see if there are any of that type of comment available. If so, then we know we're on too high of a page number and can instead display the highest existing page. Then again this introduces SEO issues.
Ideas on what to do are welcome.",Viper007Bond
Future Releases,13792,Invalid reply link from comment admin when comment nested level > max,,Comments,2.9.2,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2010-06-09T07:05:56Z,2010-11-13T17:53:57Z,"I have a blog with nested comments enabled, max depth of 4. When the last level comment is posted, it no longer contains a Reply link.
However, in the Comment admin, the Reply link is still present. If used, this new reply will show up at the very bottom of the comment list once posted (even if other newer regular comments are entered, this new reply will still show up at the very bottom).
The bug is, basically, that Comment admin doesn't respect the max nested value.",archon810
Future Releases,22261,Recent comments widget makes additional queries when pagination is enabled,,Comments,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2012-10-23T14:19:59Z,2012-10-23T14:19:59Z,A continuation of #15400.,nacin
Future Releases,11359,Don't nofollow links in admin comments,,Comments,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-12-08T12:23:15Z,2011-04-15T08:25:24Z,"Links in admin comments shouldn't have rel=nofollow.
Admin comments are not user-generated content, and the site owner (admin) is vouching for the links just like when they link from the post itself.
Therefore, this usage of nofollow is incorrect.
Also, if I go and edit a comment and remove nofollow from a link, WP adds it back. It shouldn't do that either.
Note that in the unlikely event of wanting a link in a comment to be nofollowed, this could still be done manually.",caesarsgrunt
Future Releases,6536,"Introduce the concept of ""read"" and ""unread"" comments for better workflow in the admin",markjaquith*,Comments,2.5,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,accepted,,2008-04-02T00:48:54Z,2012-03-08T01:31:11Z,"The Moderation Queue is a great way to manage your comment workflow. All comments go in there, and you approve, spam, or delete them. At the end you get a nice little ""0"" and you know you've dealt with all new comments. This doesn't work for people who don't moderate every comment. They have no idea when they are done, and which comments they have or have not looked at.
I'd like to add a {{{comment_read}}} column to the comments table. It would be either ""1"" or ""0"". There would be a new sub-tab for Comments: ""Unread comments (%d)"" This page would be just like the Moderation page, except that it would only show comments with {{{comment_read = 0}}}. This could act as ""comment workflow central"" for both people who pre-moderate and people who post-moderate. Unapproved comments would have the actions: Approve, Spam and Delete. Approved comments would have the actions: Archive, Spam and Delete. Clicking any of these actions would both carry out that action AND mark that comment as read, making it disappear from the ""Unread comments"" page. (""Archive"" only marks it as read).
Enterprising theme developers could even have this status shown on the public blog, so that people know whether their comments have been seen.
For background on this idea, please see [http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/the-comment-inbox/ The Comment Inbox]
Note that this has benefits for people who moderate every comment, because they can now store comments in the moderation queue (comments they want to remove from the blog, but not delete) without that getting in the way of their comment workflow.",markjaquith
Future Releases,7532,Need comment_modified_date_gmt for approvals and edits,,Comments,2.6,low,minor,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-08-17T04:45:49Z,2009-06-11T12:39:18Z,"Summary:[[BR]]
Currently there is only one date field for comments, comment_date_gmt. This is insufficient, because it represents only the creation date, not the approval date. The function get_lastcommentmodified can only check comment_date_gmt, which means that it can return an earlier date than the approval date. This can lead to RSS feeds wrongly returned HTTP 304 Not Modified responses. There needs to be comment_modified_date_gmt in addition to comment_date_gmt.
Steps to Reproduce:[[BR]]
(1) First comment is submitted.[[BR]]
(2) First comment is mistakenly marked as spam by Akismet.[[BR]]
(3) Second comment is submitted and posted.[[BR]]
(4) Check comments feed in RSS reader. Second comment appears in feed, first comment does not.[[BR]]
(5) Mark first comment as not spam.[[BR]]
(6) Check comments feed in RSS reader again.
Expected results:[[BR]]
Comments feed returns HTTP 200, because there is a new comment in the feed.
Actual results:[[BR]]
Comments feed returns HTTP 304.
Notes:[[BR]]
The same bug could occur in other circumstances. For example, if a comment was held for moderation.
",lapcat
Future Releases,8071,Refrain from querying all the comments on a post when paged,,Comments,2.7,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,reopened,,2008-11-05T22:17:15Z,2012-07-16T04:35:24Z,"If a post has more than (comment_per_page) comments, we should query them specifically, not query all the comments and sort in PHP (doesn't scale well).
Logic:
if threading is off, use a simple limit query
elseif the page has equal or fewer comments than (comments_per_page), query them all
else query (comments_per_page) parent comments, and keep doing queries for their children, up to the threading limit (10).",markjaquith
Future Releases,11151,Common White Screen of Death in wpdb,,Database,2.8.5,normal,major,Future Release,defect (bug),assigned,,2009-11-16T15:07:53Z,2010-12-08T21:32:54Z,"I imported some 10.000 users into WP through a custom script, using wp_insert_users().
Import successful, I could log in with new users.
Yet wp-admin/users.php page fails to load the users table; I got the admin header and menu but the page stopped loading when querying the DB for the users data.
I set WP-DEBUG to true, but still no error. NO errors in the server log also.
I eventually had to add
define('WP_MEMORY_LIMIT', '64M');
to wp-config.php to get the users.php page working.
The problem here is that the page doesn't issue the usual PHP memory limit fatal error, I had to guess to sort it out.
",nutsmuggler
Future Releases,12302,add_metadata() Fails to Store Serialized Values as BINARY,ryan,Database,,high,critical,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-02-20T10:52:15Z,2010-04-18T04:36:44Z,"Symptoms:
WordPress stores corrupt values in post_metadata if there are any non-UTF-8 bytes in the meta_value.
Steps to reproduce:
Call add_metadata() with non-UTF-8 values such as a latin-1 copyright char.
Even though the serialized string goes through prepare() before the query, MySQL is required to truncate the invalid value being assigned to the meta_value field. The result is that the stored value can never be un-serialized.
This behavior can also be replicated by trying to inject CHAR(169) into any UTF-8 table query.",miqrogroove
Future Releases,10883,db-error.php not used for all DB failures,ryan,Database,2.8.4,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2009-10-01T02:45:28Z,2013-01-25T04:39:55Z,"db-error.php (the optional custom DB error message file to be placed in wp-content) does not get included all the time. Sometimes wp-db.php will use its {{{bail()}}} method to spit out its own message. This code needs to be there too:
{{{
if ( file_exists( WP_CONTENT_DIR . '/db-error.php' ) ) {
require_once( WP_CONTENT_DIR . '/db-error.php' );
die();
}
}}}",markjaquith
Future Releases,12819,wpdb::prepare support for null,ryan,Database,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,reopened,,2010-04-02T18:15:19Z,2013-05-13T16:39:35Z,"now we can not submit null values using wpdb::prepare. if we lets say have datetime field that can be null, and execute query prepared with $wpdb->prepare(""update table set date_time_field = %s"", null) - it sets value of the field to 0, which results in 0000-00-00 00:00:00 date. what is happening here - null is quoted and passed as a string, that should not be the case.",roxaz
Future Releases,11319,oEmbed should be integrated into Add ... from URL experiences,,Editor,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-12-03T22:55:05Z,2010-10-28T08:50:33Z,"oEmbed should be integrated into Add ... from URL experiences
enhancement, ENV: WP 2.9-beta-2 ++ (trunk r12320)
For WP 2.9 we removed oEmbed from the UI, #11288.
The ""Embed"" field did not validate the oEmbed, that is part of the reason I recommended not incorporating UI for WP 2.9 -- I think JS based validation is essential to a good experience.
If you use the ""Insert an image from another web site"", once you input a URL, WordPress should automatically check if it is an oEmbed link and adjust and populate the fields as appropriate.
ADDITIONAL DETAILS
If JS is disabled, I see little benefit to including a oEmbed form. The ability just to include oEmbeds on their own line in the content seems like a good balance.",lloydbudd
Future Releases,6619,permalink field misleading in page editor: it displays the erroneous values,,Editor,2.5,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-04-06T14:48:15Z,2009-11-20T20:32:33Z,"if you create a sub-page, the permalink field should display the proper permalink.
currently, if you have:
site.com/page/
and when you create:
site.com/page/subpage/
the permalink shows:
site.com/subpage/
until it gets saved
the expected behavior would be for it to show the correct permalink.
the same remark applies when you then change the permalink. if the parent is no longer page, but rather page-2, then the permalink should update accordingly.",Denis-de-Bernardy
Future Releases,17210,Massive duplication of oEmbed postmeta,Viper007Bond,Embeds,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,dev-feedback,2011-04-21T23:38:35Z,2013-02-15T19:56:22Z,"Hey guys,
Ever since my blog grew to a considerable size (a few million PVs a month) and started slowing down and exploding my server, I've been looking and implementing various optimizations. During one such passes through the data, I noticed this really weird oEmbed related behavior, which I've been observing for a number of WP version upgrades.
I use [embed] shortcodes a lot, and every new post after a few minutes ends up with a ton of oembed caches that don't belong to it at all - they're all from other posts. Posts that don't even have [embed]s at all still have over 100 oembed entries in wp_postmeta.
Here's an example of just a small subset of data residing in the table:
[[Image(http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5230/5641419581_0610c9e267_b.jpg)]]
There are now about 150,000 entries in the wp_postmeta table due to this, half of which are duplicated _oembed entries, which I think has heavy impact on server load. Not only that but I'm sure WP is filling the table up with values by redoing oEmbed queries, which may explain that load shoots up very high at times when publishing.
{{{
mysql> select count(*) from wp_postmeta where meta_key like '_oembed%';
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 81499 |
+----------+
1 row in set
mysql> select count(*) from wp_postmeta;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 148451 |
+----------+
1 row in set
}}}
Just look at how many times this random video embed value shows up in the table. I'm sure it was used in only one actual post:
{{{
mysql> select count(*) from wp_postmeta where meta_value like '%p2oWELcd-lI%';
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 815 |
+----------+
1 row in set
}}}
Just to clarify - I don't have 815 updates to a single post that may have explained this - these are completely unrelated, separate, published posts.
To put things in perspective, here are the top 20 offenders:
{{{
mysql> select distinct meta_key, count(*) as cnt from wp_postmeta where meta_key like '_oembed%' group by meta_key order by cnt desc limit 20;
+------------------------------------------+-----+
| meta_key | cnt |
+------------------------------------------+-----+
| _oembed_5607e41abb700707540a854ae76182cf | 864 |
| _oembed_984bc07d3bc0f61b6b35230cd2fa7ced | 859 |
| _oembed_da8ae36275b4576cfcd92c0ed455be96 | 859 |
| _oembed_71dd4068a9a6911f50dbe57b3ff477c5 | 858 |
| _oembed_9f817e820c23ccbfac9b22b3474e5dd3 | 858 |
| _oembed_f3c1c03a81bc301b5f1a063f65119328 | 857 |
| _oembed_31bf10d95cb7c8e9f646d9d6e5728da0 | 857 |
| _oembed_25d0ebf59c994050cb604900cf04f53f | 856 |
| _oembed_6265dae657e38579c0a8ddb66132d526 | 852 |
| _oembed_562dd8c13888905cbd15dbd74e8699cc | 849 |
| _oembed_30ea17d1cc73acd925a74373d2be32ec | 848 |
| _oembed_87f16916b4da6571f454266bfbfaebe0 | 847 |
| _oembed_9f1f038d43e973bd60929201eee24f57 | 843 |
| _oembed_d46317d44fe11c0d90ef2cc3b45bce57 | 843 |
| _oembed_b1f8685ba405feee46baf9408eb632f7 | 841 |
| _oembed_1b56f492eba4c4ea698d816d0ecf2d51 | 840 |
| _oembed_fe597714de4081e6e7e78a88256c7db4 | 840 |
| _oembed_fb843e7b604cbc4e1ffa144d4eb300c8 | 839 |
| _oembed_97b12f2f1e59ee6eff95c61095aa5bef | 838 |
| _oembed_2b94d9f7c28ee37bfbead0a622c8be85 | 838 |
+------------------------------------------+-----+
20 rows in set
}}}
I'm quite at a loss here and would appreciate the next debugging steps. I haven't been able to determine where things are going wrong on my own.
Thank you.
P.S. The site in question is AndroidPolice.com",archon810
Future Releases,16925,Move the WP_Filesystem_SSH2 class to a plugin,dd32*,Filesystem,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),accepted,,2011-03-22T00:16:08Z,2011-07-06T03:57:26Z,"I'd like to consider moving the WP_Filesystem_SSH2 class out of WordPress core and into a plugin.
The reasoning for this is simply due to the fact that the majority of users will not use it, It already requires the PHP extension to basically be custom-compiled (thanks to limited installations coming with the extension).
In my opinion, This would be better served in a plugin, potentially with a PHP-based version as well: #10348",dd32
Future Releases,15006,Invalid Content Markup,,Formatting,3.0,normal,minor,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-10-01T13:48:12Z,2011-01-13T06:29:30Z,"I have a page post that starts like this:
{{{
Text Here
More Text Here
}}}
The HTML source saves correctly, but the page output omits the closing tag for the second P element, causing the rest of the page to be invalid.
If you have any trouble reproducing this I will be happy to debug it on my server.",miqrogroove
Future Releases,4857,More issues with wpautop(),mdawaffe*,Formatting,2.3,low,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),accepted,needs-unit-tests,2007-08-29T06:47:01Z,2009-11-28T06:33:01Z,"''Not sure if this should slide into 2.3 or if it can wait for 2.4. Change as need be.''
`wpautop()` has issues with closing ``'s when it comes to HTML.
For example:
{{{
FooBar
}}}
Results in:
{{{
Foo
Bar
}}}",Viper007Bond
Future Releases,10645,auto_p and forms,,Formatting,,low,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2009-08-18T16:53:40Z,2010-11-13T01:38:14Z,"auto_p will errantly injects paragraph and linebreak tags in certain circumstances within forms:
`
`
becomes:
`
`
linebreak and paragraph tags should never be inserted inside a label. In this case they are not even properly paired. It would be nice if the surrounding div was identified and no tags were inserted, although if a paragraph tag wrapped the whole thing, it would not be the end of the world.
",kingjeffrey
Future Releases,11202,automatic line breaks in comments,,Formatting,2.8.5,low,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2009-11-20T18:47:50Z,2010-04-02T07:34:29Z,"WordPress 2.8.6 has got a Problem with the automatic line break. [[BR]]
Example:[[BR]]
Type the following comment in a WordPress Blog.
{{{
Thank you for your comment!this is a small quote
Next Text
}}}
Then you have to save the comment. If you validate the your publish, you will see, that the sentence ""Thank you for your comment!"" will be put into the following absurd tags: [[BR]]
{{{
p>Thank you for your comment!
}}}
If you write a comment with the following code (hit return after the word ''comment! ''),[[BR]]
{{{
Thank you for your comment!
this is a small quote
Next Text
}}}
you will get the right codeform when you validate your comment:
{{{
Thank you for your comment!
}}}
The same Problem exists when you type [[BR]]
{{{
test 2 break
next text
}}}
After the word ''test 2'' you will miss the . [[BR]]
WordPress has got this bug with every single elements like these one:
{{{
,
, , - ,
bis , , etc.
}}}
When you make manuell a new line in front of these elements, you won't find any problem, so WordPress must put an automatic line break in front of these elements and it doesen't do it. Please fix this nerved bug!!
regards, Dunkelangst from http://www.dunkelangst.org/ ",Dunkelangst
Future Releases,6984,wpautop() formats the the contents of shortcodes,,Formatting,2.6,low,trivial,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2008-05-17T10:34:02Z,2009-11-28T07:20:24Z,"`wpautop()`, the bane of my existence as a plugin developer, is at it again.
Here's an example of some PHP wrapped in a valid shortcode in a post of mine:
{{{
[code lang=""php""]$text = str_replace( array('', '
'), array('', '
'), $text);[/code]
}}}
The content that gets passed to my shortcode function is this:
{{{
$text = str_replace( array('
', '
'), array('
', '
'), $text);
}}}
Expected result: it shouldn't touch the insides of valid shortcodes (like adding line breaks or anything as it is doing now).",Viper007Bond
Future Releases,5250,wpautop() issue with lists,,Formatting,2.3,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2007-10-24T00:32:38Z,2011-07-30T15:34:50Z,"First of all, my sincere apologies if this is a duplicate.
The problem, in short: WordPress inserted a number of unclosed `
` tags into my post. It should either insert correctly closed tags, or none at all. I honestly would prefer the former.
In detail: I had HTML code very similar to this:
- text
- subtext
more text
This was automatically converted to:
- text
- subtext
more text
Note the extra `` tag in the above, which is unclosed (making the W3C validator choke on my website).
Also note, I was not using the WYSIWYG editor (turning it off was the first thing I did), so it's unlikely to be due to that.
As a workaround, manually inserting properly closed `
` tags works just fine:
- text
- subtext
more text
Since this workaround exists, the bug is not very prioritary, but it should also (hopefully) be easy to fix.",Narc0tiq
Future Releases,10033,wptexturize and wpautop problems with html comments and object tags,,Formatting,2.8,normal,minor,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2009-06-04T12:06:35Z,2010-11-23T05:43:55Z,"Bumped into this one when upgrading my mediacaster plugin to use swfobject 2.1 (which is not 1.5 compatible), as documented here:
http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/wiki/documentation
I take it I'm not the only one who is going to need to upgrade a plugin. It's minor, since I'll just move the filter further down in the queue, but it's still worth reporting:
{{{
}}}
Gets turned into the following mess:
{{{
}}}
So, two/three issues:
- wpautop should also ignore double object tags, and html comments
- wptexturize should ignore html comments",Denis-de-Bernardy
Future Releases,8213,WP text formatting functions handle block-level INS tag incorrectly,markjaquith*,Formatting,2.7,low,minor,Future Release,enhancement,accepted,,2008-11-14T14:51:09Z,2009-06-11T14:26:44Z,"From W3C documentation:
""INS and DEL are used to markup sections of the document that have been inserted or deleted with respect to a different version of a document (e.g., in draft legislation where lawmakers need to view the changes).
These two elements are unusual for HTML in that they may serve as either BLOCK-LEVEL or INLINE elements (but not both). They may contain one or more words within a paragraph or contain one or more block-level elements such as paragraphs, lists and tables.""
----
When I want to use INS tag as BLOCK-LEVEL element (to wrap to paragraphs for example) wrong HTML is produced:
{{{
First paragraph.
Second paragraph.
}}}
Correct HTML should look like this:
{{{
First paragraph.
Second paragraph.
}}}
I think the same sitiuation occurs for DEL tag.
",misieg772
Future Releases,5161,balance_tags option should not be in the user interface,,Formatting,2.3,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2007-10-08T08:02:49Z,2013-01-22T01:19:58Z,"In the WP Admin → Options → Writing ({{{options-writing.php}}}), there is an option ""!WordPress should correct invalidly nested XHTML automatically"" which controls whether {{{balance_tags()}}} is run on post content or not.
I'm fully supportive of this feature — I think it's important to ensure the HTML that is output to browsers is valid. There have been a few situations where users needed to turn this off, e.g. bugs in the function, or a plugin misbehaves with it on (if I remember correctly, runPHP).
However, this is a KDE-style option where it is put there for a niche case. In 99% of cases, you will want it on.
A few people on the mailing lists have stated a number of times that we should take a GNOME-like approach to these sort of features, and let them be controlled only by plugins. This option is left over from the dark ages of !WordPress, and I don't think the cases for turning it off are big enough to warrant its inclusion in the user interface.
If a plugin has a problem with balancing tags (e.g. runPHP), the offending plugin can simply remove the filter.
{{{
remove_filter('content_save_pre', 'balance_tags);
}}}
(...or whatever the code would be.)
The new canonical redirect feature has far more many problems, and far more justification for it to be turned off, yet I don't see a checkbox ""Redirect links to their canonical URL"" anywhere in the user interface. If anything should have a checkbox, it's the canonical redirect feature — but, it doesn't have any such thing. So, we should remove this checkbox as well.",JeremyVisser
Future Releases,10489,UI Improvements for the gallery tab (edit post),,Gallery,2.8.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-07-26T11:52:10Z,2010-10-28T08:48:06Z,"It would be nice to ever display the ""Gallery Settings"" Section on the gallery tab, even if only one image exists. That would help if you talk via phone and explain someone something. Often from-sections are helpfull to validate wether or not the other is on the same page as you are while explaining something.
",hakre
Future Releases,16230,Category slugs not cut at 200 characters as it should under some conditions,,General,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2011-01-14T14:10:23Z,2011-07-17T02:21:27Z,"When a category name is longer than 200 characters, it is cut to 200 and so is the slug automatically created upon category creation.
Now, if you edit the category name or slug afterwards, again trying to set a name longer than 200 characters it is cut again.
But, if you edit the name or slug and use a very long string like this one:
%d1%85%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%bd%d0%b0/%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%86%d0%b5%d0%bf%d1%82%d0%b8/%d0%b4%d0%b5%d1%81%d0%b5%d1%80%d1%82%d0%b8-%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%86%d0%b5%d0%bf%d1%82%d0%b8-%d1%85%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%bd%d0%b0/%d1%81%d0%bb%d0%b0%d0%b4%d0%ba%d0%b8%d1%88%d0%b8-%d0%b4%d0%b5%d1%81%d0%b5%d1%80%d1%82%d0%b8-%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%86%d0%b5%d0%bf%d1%82%d0%b8-%d1%85%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%86%d0%b5%d0%bf%d1%/
Then the slug ends up being longer than the 200 chars limit.
Now if on the Categories list dashboard page you have more categories than visible on one page, and the category you edited above is not on page 1, the page it is on will appear empty (while successive pages will be all right if they contain regular categories)
This has been reproduced on 3.1-RC2-17283",paolal
Future Releases,2691,HTML comments in posts aren't handled properly.,,General,2.8.5,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2006-04-25T03:16:37Z,2011-02-28T06:45:22Z,"When an HTML comment is added in a post, autop adds paragraph ( ) tags around the comment and for multi-line comments line breaks (
) are added after every line. This should not happen in HTML comments.
This ticket is similar to #712 which was closed with wontfix. I would like to know why this isn't seen as an issue? It prevents the addition of RDF and other metadata, not to mention just plain old HTML comments in posts.",gord
Future Releases,14581,No magic numbers,,General,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-08-10T15:57:59Z,2010-11-26T21:54:49Z,Add defines for the numeric user_status and comment_status values.,ryan
Future Releases,14745,Renaming a Link-Category Resets Link Widget Options of that Category,,General,,low,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-08-31T13:21:50Z,2010-12-27T17:42:30Z,"When renaming the name of a Link Category that is used as well in a Link Widget, the Link Widget stops working.
Step to Reproduce:
1. Create a Link Category ""Test Start"".
2. Add 10 Links into the Category ""Test Start"".
3. Go to the Widgets Screen and add a new Link Widget to a sidebar.
4. Select that Link-Widget and set it from ""All-Links"" to the Category ""Test Start"".
5. Visit your Frontpage so proof that the Widget displays.
6. Go to the Link Cagegory Editor and quick-edit the ""Test Start"" Category.
7. Rename it to ""Test End"".
8. Save Changes.
9. Visit your Frontpage.
''=>>'' The Widget has disappeared.
'''Expected behavior:''' Widget displaying with the (renamed) link category.
",hakre
Future Releases,11414,Sidebar Calendar Widget broken,,General,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,reporter-feedback,2009-12-12T22:33:24Z,2010-11-13T07:31:07Z,"I'm giving 2.9 beta a test drive for theme development purposes. On my test installation, I currently have the two default themes and a very simple theme of my own that I developed via a tutorial.
After I upgraded to 2.9 beta, the sidebar calendar started displaying rather oddly. It looks okay when the main page first loads, but when I click the < wp_list_pages SHOULD return nothing, but instead it displays all child pages of the first parent page ID in the ""exclude"" attr (here: 3).
Now we now add the ""exclude_tree"" attr just for fun:
2) wp_list_pages('title_li=&depth=1&exclude=3,5,7&exclude_tree=3,5,7');
=> should again return nothing, but instead, it displays the first-ever published child page globally (here: a child page of 5).
It looked like random behavior at first but I've been able to identify the above pattern. I'm guessing it's a failing condition somewhere in the function.",bobsoap
Future Releases,11642,Allow to define upload path and url in wp-config.php,,General,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-12-27T11:11:35Z,2012-09-28T11:44:33Z,"When someone wants to move default directories elsewhere, he/she must do work in two places: add defines to wp-config.php and change upload path on settings page. I think it will be good to introduce two new defines: UPLOAD_PATH and UPLOAD_URL_PATH. When they will be defined, WordPress should use them and do not allow to change these on settings page - similarly to home and site url options.",sirzooro
Future Releases,23168,Introduce remove_post_status,,General,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2013-01-10T08:32:49Z,2013-05-10T12:37:37Z,Plugins and themes should be able to remove the default post statuses defined by core.,kovshenin
Future Releases,14946,Only enforce OEmbed whitelisting for dangerous types,,General,3.0.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2010-09-23T08:23:48Z,2010-11-23T21:14:44Z,"Of the four OEmbed response types, only two (video and rich) are potentially dangerous. We should be able to allow all photo and link responses, without a whitelist.",markjaquith
Future Releases,7745,Private posts cannot have unpublished or pending review status,,General,2.6.1,low,minor,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-09-15T16:32:19Z,2013-01-22T16:46:33Z,"Posts with private ticked are immediately set to published, and cannot be reverted to unpublished or pending review while private is ticked. Given the default use of private posts, this behavior is understandable, but it seems far simpler if the behavior remained consistent with public posts.
In our particular case, we are using Role Manager to allow subscribers to read private posts. A simple solution that suits our particular needs well. But we really need the full draft/review process, just as with public posts.",nyoungman
Future Releases,9785,Search Enhancements -- consolidated ticket,,General,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-05-10T23:54:34Z,2012-06-25T01:47:24Z,"Closing the following as dups, pending ""the big search overhaul"" that may never come:
- #5149 -- search everywhere (with committed patch)
- #9230 -- search in post and pages and both
- #5525 -- also search for posts with search query as terms (tags, cats, ...)
- #5054 -- allow to negate keyword on search
- #7394 -- assign greater weight to posts with search query in title
- #7647 -- search in attachment descriptions",Denis-de-Bernardy
Future Releases,17780,Use PHP native double encoding prevention in htmlspecialchars(),,General,,low,minor,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-06-13T08:03:13Z,2011-06-13T08:03:13Z,"Since PHP 5.2.3 the {{{htmlspecialchars()}}} function has an optional {{{$double_encode}}} parameter, which we could use. This can save us a few expensive kses/html decoding calls.
We need to make sure it works the same way as our implementation.",nbachiyski
Future Releases,16867,Where is it appropriate to use filter_var,,General,3.2,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,reopened,,2011-03-16T16:47:13Z,2012-02-08T14:22:28Z,"Now that we require PHP 5.2 we have access to a whole plethora of new functions. One of those is [http://php.net/filter_var/ filter_var]. It seems like this could be useful for things like validating and filtering E-Mail addresses, URLs, IPs, etc. (there are plenty of [php.net/manual/en/filter.filters.php filters]).
This was brought up in #15379 where nacin said:
Those can be buggy. We could potentially leverage it internally but we need to watch out for vulnerabilities and what not across PHP versions.
I mostly wanted this to be the place where we decide what could benefit from it and what shouldn't.",aaroncampbell
Future Releases,13436,Wordpress class_exists() conflicts with __autoload() and php_auto_prepend,,General,3.1,normal,minor,Future Release,enhancement,reopened,,2010-05-18T15:51:26Z,2010-12-14T17:42:54Z,"== Issue ==
Wordpress core (and many plugins) use class_exists().
http://php.net/manual/en/function.class-exists.php
When Wordpress is integrated with custom/third party applications that use php_auto_prepend and autoload() to include/require files based on the $class_name parameter this generates errors as class_exists() triggers the autoload() and the files cannot be found.
== To reproduce ==
Using php_auto_prepend specify a file to include before every page request that contains the following PHP code:
{{{
}}}
Visit any front-end or back-end Wordpress page.
== Solution ==
As there is no autoload() function defined in Wordpress core the class_exists() should implement the second class_exists() parameter:
{{{
}}}
This stops calls to __autoload() and would fix the errors seen when integrating Wordpress with apps that implement this.
I have implemented this and tested it and Wordpress works fine, but I can't find out where the SVN repo is for Wordpress 3 Beta 2 (the SVN page on the site takes me to 2.x).
If someone could supply a link for SVN CO of WP3 I can provide the patch.",galbus
Future Releases,14653,Log IP address un UserMeta when account is created,,General,,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,dev-feedback,2010-08-20T01:41:24Z,2010-10-28T10:18:48Z,"As WordPress becomes more and more a CMS for everything, not just blogs, managing users becoms more important. With MultiSite and user registration more open, WordPress should have a built in way to record the IP address of a user.
So at registration, log the IP in usermeta. Done, easy. List it on the user page.
At comments, obviously, it's already logged, so nothing needs be done there. Also, since you can already click on an IP and list all comments made from that address, there wouldn't be much else that needs to be done.",Ipstenu
Future Releases,16870,consider disabling HTTP transport after multiple failed requests,,HTTP,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2011-03-16T23:18:45Z,2011-07-16T23:31:02Z,"There has been a number of reports over the lifespan of the cURL HTTP transport failing with an error during upgrades:
{{{
WP HTTP Error: name lookup timed out
}}}
This is a common error from cURL on badly configured installations (specifically, IIRC it lacks DNS Resolving in cURL, sometimes it just required an extended amount of time to resolve, others, it simply can't resolve)
Like we do with fsockopen() I think it'd be worth disabling the cURL transport for x hours when it hits this particular error condition..
Related threads: http://wordpress.org/support/topic/dashboard-issues-rss-error-wp-http-error-name-lookup-timed-out and http://wordpress.org/support/topic/plugins-update-failure Both old threads, so this may only affect a PHP4 version of cURL.. For tracking purposes, I've finally created this ticket.",dd32
Future Releases,15677,It is not possible to install multiple variants of the same language,,I18N,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-12-04T15:07:28Z,2011-06-04T10:21:10Z,"Because of the way {{{mu_dropdown_languages()}}} and {{{format_code_lang()}}} work, it is impossible to have multiple variants of the same language installed. The list of languages returned by {{{mu_dropdown_languages()}}} only includes one variant of each language (the one with the country code which comes last when sorted alphabetically).
For example, if .mo files for es_ES and es_PE are both installed, then only es_PE will be shown.
Furthermore, whatever variant of the language is installed, the name will be the same, not indicating the correct language variant. In the example above, the language name will be ""Spanish; Castillian"", even for the es_PE localisation. This is highly misleading.
A final problem is that the langauge names are not localised themselves, with the exception of ""English"".
The cause of these problems is the fact that {{{format_code_lang()}}} ignores the country code and only considers the language code when choosing the name to return. Furthermore, it returns hardcoded language names rather than translated names.
Since {{{mu_dropdown_languages()}}} uses the return value of {{{format_code_lang()}}} as the key for its internal {{{$output}}} array, this means that later language variants overwrite earlier ones.",caesarsgrunt
Future Releases,7837,Localization of numbers should be supported,,I18N,,low,minor,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2008-10-06T16:46:16Z,2009-11-23T15:21:12Z,"I'm new to WordPress so please bear with me: I believe localization of numbers should be added to WordPress features. This means that, if you install WordPress and use (for example) Arabic language packs, numbers should be shown using Arabic digits, not English digits.",huji
Future Releases,14981,Two i18n misses,,I18N,3.3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-09-27T23:21:29Z,2012-02-07T22:40:08Z,"1) /wp-admin/nav-menus.php: the ""Most Recent"" string (/wp-admin/includes/nav-menu.php:645) should be separated between the Pages context and the Articles context, since they can take different forms according to the language (i.e.: in French, ""Articles"" is masculine, ""Pages"" is feminine.
2) /wp-admin/edit.php: Same contextual need for ""All"", ""Published"", ""Scheduled"" and the rest of the per-status selector, for posts and articles (and others...). ",xibe
Future Releases,20738,Improve Javascript Word Counting for TinyMCE,,I18N,3.4,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2012-05-23T21:07:54Z,2012-05-30T13:57:17Z,"This is a follow on from #8759 to further improve the code.
While we improved it in 3.4 we can do a better job to more fully support the customisation for all different locales.
For know issues see the comments on the previous ticket.",westi
Future Releases,17120,Class WP_Importer references STDIN which is not available in Web Environments,,Import,3.0,low,minor,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2011-04-13T09:58:12Z,2011-04-13T09:58:12Z,"STDERR is not defined in web environments (only certain CLI environments), you can call fopen('php://stderr'); directly, however this is not delivered to browsers.
Since this is in the Multisite code, CLI imports might be more common, but it's not a given that multisite imports will not be run from the web either.
Code ref:
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/browser/trunk/wp-admin/includes/class-wp-importer.php#L128
{{{
126 $blog = 'http://' . preg_replace( '#^https?://#', '', $blog_id );
127 if ( ( !$parsed = parse_url( $blog ) ) || empty( $parsed['host'] ) ) {
128 fwrite( STDERR, ""Error: can not determine blog_id from $blog_id\n"" );
129 exit();
130 }
131 if ( empty( $parsed['path'] ) )
132 $parsed['path'] = '/';
133 $blog = get_blog_details( array( 'domain' => $parsed['host'], 'path' => $parsed['path'] ) );
134 if ( !$blog ) {
135 fwrite( STDERR, ""Error: Could not find blog\n"" );
136 exit();
137 }
}}}
I'm unsure of the best way to tackle this, Ideally in a CLI environment we want the error outputs going to STDERR, but since that's not available or visible to web browsers, wp_die() would be a better choice.
One potential method would be to direct wp_die() to STDERR in CLI environments - That might cause problems with the test suite however (I'm unsure)",dd32
Future Releases,19764,Invalid JSON in custom fields meta value after export,,Import,3.3.1,normal,normal,WordPress.org,defect (bug),new,,2012-01-06T17:13:07Z,2012-09-10T10:12:22Z,"Hey there,
I exported a working copy of my online WordPress site to a local copy and noticed that the code gets changed; The backslash is removed which causes the json format to be invalide.
Original code in the custom fields meta
{{{
{""videos"":{""0"":""""}}
}}}
Becomes in the local site after import
{{{
{""videos"":{""0"":""""}}
}}}
",abdessamad idrissi
Future Releases,8877,dotclear import don't set the post category,westi*,Import,,low,normal,WordPress.org,defect (bug),accepted,,2009-01-17T22:05:20Z,2012-05-24T22:32:57Z,"when importing from dotclear, all the posts are set only to the default category.
i think the problem is due to the fact that wp_set_post_categories do nothing if we pass it only one category (don't know why...)
( in /wp-admin/import/dotclear.php, line 479 )
{{{
// Make Post-to-Category associations
$cats = array();
$category1 = get_category_by_slug($post_cat_name);
$category1 = $category1->term_id;
}}}
should be
{{{
// Make Post-to-Category associations
$cats = array(get_option('default_category'));
$category1 = get_category_by_slug($post_cat_name);
$category1 = $category1->term_id;
}}}
",olivM
Future Releases,4555,Better Typepad / MT Import - Atompub importer,lloydbudd,Import,2.3,normal,minor,WordPress.org,enhancement,new,,2007-06-28T03:16:12Z,2011-09-15T17:17:07Z,"Typepad in particular does some really funky things with permalinks. They often have no relation to anything in the title, and none of their ""slug"" information is contained in their standard export, so there is literally no way to redirect those links.
It is possible to create a custom Typepad template that includes the needed information, and modify the WP importer to parse the extra info into slugs. Right now this is a hack, we should make this more intuitive.",matt
Future Releases,12227,Tags are converted to categories upon importation of content from Blogger,,Import,2.9.1,normal,normal,WordPress.org,enhancement,new,,2010-02-14T18:24:13Z,2012-05-24T22:32:40Z,"When I imported posts from my old blog at Blogger/Blogspot, all the tags used for the Blogger posts were converted to categories in WP. ",dwstultz
Future Releases,22837,"WP Needs to Set ""Sender"" and ""Reply-To"" or DKIM/DMARC will not work using wp-mail (via PHPMailer)",,Mail,3.4.2,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2012-12-09T17:23:48Z,2013-01-24T03:58:25Z,"I notice that for DKIM to function (while using DMARC) correctly for outgoing mail the PHPMailer object needs to make sure the Sender and Reply-To fields match the ""From"" field otherwise the ""Return-Path"" header uses the server it is sending from causing a mismatch. When this happens DKIM fails authentication on the receiver side because it is not added to outgoing mail.
I tried adding the reply-to and sender header manually to wp_mail() but it did not work. One had to do the following:
Right now i have to manually modify the /wp-includes/pluggable.php file in the wp_mail() function to include:
{{{
if (strlen($phpmailer->Sender)==0)
{
$phpmailer->Sender = $phpmailer->From;
$phpmailer->AddReplyTo($phpmailer->From);
}
}}}
This resolves the problem and DKIM works again.
",kellogg9
Future Releases,15807,Featured image doesn't attach to post,,Media,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,dev-feedback,2010-12-14T11:57:23Z,2010-12-26T23:09:57Z,"When you use an image as featured, it doesn't attach to the post.
Possibly related with #14390 (post image (thumbnail) in [gallery])
Tests:
• If the image is already attached, it doesn't reattach ✔
• If the image is uploaded while writing the post, it attaches like another image, even if you are not using it in the post. ✔
• If an image is in the media library, not attached, and you use it in your post, it automatically attaches to the post. ✔
• If the image is in the media library, not attached, and you use it as featured image in a post, it doesn't attach ✘
",bi0xid
Future Releases,10752,Uploading new media to existing posts/pages backdates file location,,Media,2.8.4,normal,minor,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2009-09-08T20:35:20Z,2012-08-28T20:57:35Z,"Using WP 2.8.4, when uploading new media files to a page or post that has already been published, the new file is added in the /UPLOAD_DIR/year/month/ directory that corresponds to the original page/post publication date, rather than the file upload date.
Also, the correct file-upload-date-based directory is created (if it does not already exist), but the file is still placed in the older incorrect directory.
Example: Assume the following...
On /wp-admin/options-misc.php:
* ""Store uploads in this folder"" (referred to above as UPLOAD_DIR) is set to ""wp-content/uploads"" or any other location, such as ""files""
* ""Organize my uploads into month- and year-based folders"" is checked
On an existing Page:
* Page has a published date of 3/1/2008
* File a_test_file.jpg is uploaded on 9/1/2009
* UPLOAD_DIR is set to ""wp-content/uploads"", has 777 permissions, and contains no subdirectories or files
WordPress 2.6.x and below would have created the following:
* /wp-content/uploads/2009/09/a_test_file.jpg
However, WP 2.8.4 is creating:
* /wp-content/uploads/2008/03/a_test_file.jpg
* /wp-content/uploads/2009/09
This issue was previously mentioned on the wordpress.org forums as being a known issue with WP 2.7.1: http://wordpress.org/support/topic/254786",dpie
Future Releases,13568,Add filters to media uploader,,Media,3.0,low,minor,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-05-27T01:02:56Z,2011-12-30T13:12:12Z,"In wp-admin > includes > media.php:
There should be a ""gallery_fields_to_edit"" filter similar to the ""attachment_fields_to_edit filter"", allowing gallery options to be filtered out. (Begins line #1749)
Additionally, it should be possible to disable the ""Insert into Post"" button below each image (I believe it's line #1239 of the current build).
I'm sorry, but my PHP knowledge is insufficient to write a working patch.",nudnik
Future Releases,17247,Crop tool is automatically selected when editing an image,,Media,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-04-27T00:17:31Z,2011-04-27T09:34:31Z,"The crop tool is automatically selected when editing an image with the built-in tools. This can be confusing as the crop button is greyed out and inactive by default.
To reproduce:
1. Create a new post or page
2. Upload an image
3. Click the Gallery tab
4. For the image you uploaded click ""Edit Image""
The crop tool will be automatically selected. If you drag the mouse over the image it will select an area to crop.
A more intuitive behavior would be to have none of the editing tools selected by default.
Currently, the next step is presumed when you click ""Edit Image."" It would be better to leave the next step up to each user so that clicking ""Edit Image"" didn't imply a default action.",andrewspittle
Future Releases,11078,"Media Library tab in post editor should have ""Unattached"" and ""Trash"" filter options",,Media,2.9,normal,minor,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-11-05T04:16:04Z,2010-01-06T03:45:50Z,"The master Media Library admin page has options for viewing attachments based on their status, not just type—but the post editor media management only allows sorting based on type.
Having at least the ability to filter for unattached media items would be useful when editing a post. Occasionally users could have older media that is not yet attached to a post and could get buried in the media pages by newer items.",markel
Future Releases,13372,Separate Image sizes for different post types,,Media,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,close,2010-05-13T07:59:07Z,2013-01-03T16:14:23Z,"Would be nice, especially moving forward with custom post types to have the ability to set different image sizes using an additional parameter of `add_image_size()` for different post types: Page, Post, and Custom.",brandondove
Future Releases,10950,Download external files to Media Library,,Media,,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2009-10-13T15:48:43Z,2011-08-04T19:11:02Z,"The media uploader currently allows you to upload a file from your local computer or link to an external URL.
However, when linking to an external URL (in particular for an image), you don't get the same options as you would have when actually adding a resource to your site's media library.
It would be nice to be able to fetch a file from an external source, and add it to the library, just as with a regular file upload. Then the file could be included in a gallery, you could use the image editor to crop/resize, etc.
Primary use-case would be to fetch an external image into the library without having the extra steps of saving to your local computer, then re-uploading it to your WP site. However, it should work with any allowed content-type (audio, video, pdf, etc).
It may also be useful to save the original URL as attachment metadata.
",dougal
Future Releases,14884,Add a filter inside admin-ajax.php for walker,,Menus,3.0.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-09-16T14:01:31Z,2010-11-18T09:19:16Z,"I'm trying to extend the Wordpress menu system and i can't get the things working from start because inside admin-ajax.php on line 841, there is no filter. I'm talking about this piece of code
{{{
if ( ! empty( $menu_items ) ) {
$args = array(
'after' => '',
'before' => '',
'link_after' => '',
'link_before' => '',
'walker' => new Walker_Nav_Menu_Edit,
);
echo walk_nav_menu_tree( $menu_items, 0, (object) $args );
}
}}}
The Walker_Nav_Menu_Edit class is applied by default.
If someone can add a filter, it would be great for all developers.",dmad
Future Releases,10597,More classes in menu generated using wp_list_pages and wp_page_menu,ryan,Menus,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-08-12T11:17:41Z,2010-03-01T20:46:38Z,"I think that dev team should think about adding more classes to positions generated by wp_list_pages and wp_page_menu as it's very hard to style those menus. I'm thinking about class ""parent"" for every li that contains another ul etc. We got current_page_ancestor and others but they only work if you're on the child ...",newkind
Future Releases,14331,Tweaks to menu setup page,,Menus,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-07-16T21:30:45Z,2012-08-07T10:47:34Z,"It would be great if you could select a parent Page and ""Automatically add children"" to the menu.
In a similar fashion, it would be great if the Menu could then automatically add any new children Pages created under that Parent.",mrmist
Future Releases,17904,Multisite has more restrictions on user login character set,,Multisite,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2011-06-27T11:09:12Z,2013-02-12T20:54:04Z,"Multisite has more restrictions on the characters allowed in a user's login name compared to single site. This seems unnecessary and confusing. It was also the root of a recent bug in the importer, see [http://wordpress.org/support/topic/invalid-author-importing-single-wordpress-to-mulitsite-wordpress?replies=21#post-2186667 this forum thread] and the [http://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/401649 workaround].
I haven't worked up a patch yet since there seem to be a few locations where these restrictions are enforced and I don't know if I have found them all yet:
- wpmu_validate_user_signup() uses the regex `/[a-z0-9]+/`
- ms-default-filters.php adds `strtolower` to `sanitize_user`
Relevant: http://mu.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/1689 [12948]",duck_
Future Releases,12832,Use the same data type for site statuses,database,Multisite,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-04-03T19:48:20Z,2012-01-31T17:50:59Z,"For status archived we use:
{{{
archived enum('0','1') NOT NULL default '0',
}}}
Fo the others:
{{{
public tinyint(2) NOT NULL default '1',
mature tinyint(2) NOT NULL default '0',
spam tinyint(2) NOT NULL default '0',
deleted tinyint(2) NOT NULL default '0',
}}}
Shouldn't we use the same data type for the others?
",ocean90
Future Releases,13554,Wordpress MU canonical link redirect failure,markjaquith,Multisite,2.9.2,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-05-26T16:30:37Z,2010-11-13T08:02:46Z,"This problem manifests itself in Wordpress '''MU''' 2.9.2, but '''not''' in Wordpress 2.9.2.
In the MU install where blogs are subdirectories, canonical redirects work correctly for the subdirectory blogs, but not for pages on the root blog.
For example, [http://silverwarethief.com/essays/] is a sub-blog in the wordpress MU install. If you alter that link to [http://www.silverwarethief.com/essays/] wordpress MU will correctly redirect the browser to the canonical url.
However, this does not work with pages on the root blog. [http://silverwarethief.com/about/] is a page on the root blog. If you go to that link, you will correctly find yourself at the ""About"" page. If you then alter the link to [http://www.silverwarethief.com/about/] you will be redirected to the main page of the root blog, not the ""About"" page.
I have seen this behavior manifested on more than one MU install.
",rundi
Future Releases,12030,Better Options for New Registrations,,Multisite,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-01-26T00:23:07Z,2012-04-18T17:13:58Z,"MU Trac Ticket: http://trac.mu.wordpress.org/ticket/872
At the moment when new users register, there are very few options and not many plugins available.. It would be nice if the administrator could :
1) Allow passwords to be set during registration, rather than having it sent by email.
2) Make Email Verification optional.
3) See the users who haven't confirmed their registrations, and resend the confirmation emails from the admin area..
4) User Moderation : Make it easier to kick out users and delete spammers..
5) Invitation Codes (Optional): Allow the admin to create invite codes, which he can distribute, so that the mu install is well knit social community.
I know this is pretty much doable, but there lacks any good solution at the moment.
",wpmuguru
Future Releases,14172,Implement $scheme in site info in ms-sites edit site,,Multisite,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-07-01T22:45:33Z,2010-07-03T19:17:45Z,"In WordPress 3.0 with Network enabled, if you were to click:
Super Admin -> Sites -> Edit (next to any site) and then change any of the Site Options i.e. wp_2_options the changes don't save.
We're running a secure environment and need Siteurl to be HTTPS instead of HTTP. Changing all the parameters to https and clicking Update doesn't save the changes.",firmdot
Future Releases,18161,Bulk action: Add user to multiple sites,,Network Admin,3.2,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2011-07-18T19:07:04Z,2011-09-10T05:44:38Z,"Currently, to add a single user to multiple sites, the super admin has to edit each site, add the user to the site, and then go on to the next site.
To improve this workflow, it would tremendously useful to be able to add a single user to multiple sites in the network admin.
This ticket could have scaling problems to solve.",danielbachhuber
Future Releases,8492,Page name drop-downs do not scale well,,Optimization,2.7,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2008-12-04T22:59:17Z,2009-11-23T21:30:53Z,"The page title drop-downs on options-reading and page.php seem to scale poorly in page loading times when you have a large number (around 1000) of Pages.
I need to go to bed now so haven't researched this much, but I think the options-reading bit could be improved - I think it's currently fetching all of wp_posts when it only needs the title, which is a fair bit of wasted DB and processing time.
rev 10051 and previous.",mrmist
Future Releases,16894,Bulk load Comment Meta upon access,,Performance,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,dev-feedback,2011-03-19T11:19:27Z,2011-03-19T12:12:05Z,"When we query posts, we bulk load all of the posts meta and taxonomies at the time of request. Since adding comment meta, we load the comment meta on-the-fly since nothing really currently uses it in core.
I've added a filter to ''get_comment_text'' which modifies the comment content based on the value of a meta key.
The problem arises when multiple comments are displayed on a page, The metadata for every comment is loaded individually:
{{{
SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (4)
SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (5)
SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (6)
SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (7)
SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (34)
SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (35)
SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (37)
}}}
in all cases, the function stack is:
{{{
comments_template, wp_list_comments, Walker->paged_walk, Walker_Comment->display_element, Walker->display_element, call_user_func_array, Walker_Comment->start_el, call_user_func, twentyten_comment, comment_text, get_comment_text, apply_filters, call_user_func_array, MY_FUNCTION_HOOKED_TO_GET_COMMENT_TEXT, get_comment_meta, get_metadata, update_meta_cache #12 (0.7ms)
}}}
It isn't ideal that every comment causes an extra query, instead, we should bulk load comment meta for the comments being displayed.
However, Since comment meta is not always used, in order to keep the load down, I'd suggest that we only bulk load the comment meta '''on the first request for comment meta''', this should allow current users to have no detrimental affect on query count/performance, whilst allowing those who use comment meta to manage each comment better performance.",dd32
Future Releases,22192,update_metadata() and update_option() strict checks can cause false negatives,,Performance,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,needs-unit-tests,2012-10-15T03:19:23Z,2012-10-15T10:22:31Z,"Given this:
{{{
add_post_meta( $post_id, 'key', 1 );
update_post_meta( $post_id, 'key', 1 );
}}}
The update should not work, because they are the same. However, the meta cache will have ""1"" as a string, and then it will strict compare it to 1 as an integer. Thus, an unnecessary update will run.
Best I can tell, this could also affect update_option().
It is quite common to use integers and booleans directly into these functions. They should be smart enough to recognize that ""1"" == 1 == true and ""0"" == 0 == false, and that any numeric string is also equal to a properly cast integer.
Unit tests needed.
Ticket from which this was spun: #22189, saving navigation menus is slow.",nacin
Future Releases,16343,"API for WP_Scripts: allow async loading, version checks",,Performance,,normal,minor,Future Release,enhancement,assigned,,2011-01-22T18:07:39Z,2011-01-25T15:48:01Z,"When developping a theme lately, I have found myself in the need of directly accesing the internals of the WP_Scripts class. I feel the funcionality I need might well help other developers.
Use cases:
1.- Asynchronously load a (JS) script loaded by a/another plugin
When loading a certain page, we needed to asynchronously load some (relatively heavy) scripts which are only seldom used. In order to keep page rendering fast, we only load them on demand, after the page frame has been rendered.
In order to avoid having to bundle (potentially conflicting versions) scripts in every plugin and prevent duplicate loading, I suggest adding an API which would enable querying the source (as used by 'scripts-loader')
2.- Version checks for loaded scripts
For high-performance sites, it might be useful to load a Google (or some other CDN) -provided jQuery et al ---which the user might already have cached--- instead of the bundled one, as long as it is the same version.
Code example:
$ver = $wp_scripts->version('jquery');
wp_unregister_script('jquery');
wp_register_script('jquery',""http://ajax.googleapis.com/jquery/$ver/jquery.min.js"",false,$ver);
(needs discussion)
I can provide the code (or the patch against Core) when the solution is decided (or soonish, if a proof-of-concept is needed)
If WP 3.2 is going to finally be PHP 5.2+, I'd rather basically rewrite WP_Scripts (and/or WP_Dependencies).
",jltallon
Future Releases,17246,Handling of HTTP 404 errors for non-existing files,,Performance,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-04-26T18:50:15Z,2011-05-12T04:19:27Z,"Generally if WordPress sees a request for a specific file it means the web server couldn't find that file. Currently we run all of WordPress in such cases and output the theme's 404 template.
If the missing file is an image that has been reused 10 times (perhaps a CSS background or sprite) we will run ten extra times on every page load.
What I'm proposing is to short-circuit all requests for specific files very early in the load cycle, the same way we do it for favicon.ico requests and output a generic 404 notice.",azaozz
Future Releases,11585,WordPress should cache failed feed fetches so as to avoid overloading feed sources,,Performance,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-12-24T02:25:17Z,2010-03-01T16:41:13Z,"Following up on #11219, which fixed the cause of that particular error, but not the one that related to caching of feed errors.
When SimplePie fails to fetch or parse a feed, it should not hammer whichever server the feed came from on every page load. This is bad for two reasons: it disturbs the originating server, and it tremendously slows down page loads when the feed is in an RSS widget on the front end.
Instead, we should cache the error for a reasonably long amount of time (15 minutes? An hour? More?) and bypass SimplePie until that duration expires.",Denis-de-Bernardy
Future Releases,8905,Category pagination broken with certain permalink structures,ryan,Permalinks,2.7,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2009-01-21T07:26:31Z,2013-01-03T21:37:18Z,"If one uses a permalink structure with %category% followed by %postname%, accessing pagination can cause a 404, as WordPress attempts to look for a post called ""page"".
As per http://barefootdevelopment.blogspot.com/2007/11/fix-for-wordpress-paging-problem.html
Presumably can occur with other permalink structures too.",rmccue
Future Releases,5305,permalinks broken when article name is numeric,ryan,Permalinks,2.3.1,normal,major,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2007-11-01T21:27:54Z,2013-05-09T15:51:24Z,"if you create numeric-only post name, the generated slug is this number - this conflicts with article ID, so it returns different article or 404 page, never the article. It can be then solved by generating manual slug with some char in it, but i think it would be better to include some char in that case, e.g. underscore, like _123
Also if someone will try to solve this, it would be nice to solve other problem - if post slug is begining with the slug of the category, than the category page returns that post, not the category",thomask
Future Releases,8515,Archive Permalink,ryan,Permalinks,,lowest,trivial,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-12-06T22:08:05Z,2009-06-13T18:39:14Z,"Currently in the permalink settings, you can set a category and a tag base. I propose that an archive base also be added. It would be useful in that you could disallow the archive base in robots.txt (much like many do with the tag and category base), but still allow robots to get the posts.
Presently, doing this is a problem, as if you disallow /2008, for example, it will also disallow the robot to access the individual posts.",LuckyBambu
Future Releases,9825,"Enforce permalink history, outright",,Permalinks,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,assigned,dev-feedback,2009-05-15T01:06:37Z,2011-02-16T12:02:57Z,"currently, we enforce old slugs and www pref (not even sure that works, since I ended up fixing it in a plugin). canonical doesn't work for pages, or hardly.
we should enforce permalink history, outright. store it in a a db field, and query against it to optimize url2post().",Denis-de-Bernardy
Future Releases,1914,Permalinks for unattached uploads/attachments,,Permalinks,1.6,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,reopened,,2005-11-19T09:21:26Z,2012-10-31T21:56:22Z,"Currently attachement links are in the form:
{{{
http://www.example.com/?attachment_id=1
}}}
Would look much neater if these matched the permalinks of regular posts (depending on what it is configured to) eg:
{{{
http://www.example.com/attachement/1/
}}}",dlhau@…
Future Releases,5130,Linking to multiple posts on your site breaks pingback due to comment flooding,,Pings/Trackbacks,2.3,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2007-10-01T17:36:13Z,2010-12-26T03:34:02Z,"http://scott.sherrillmix.com/blog/programmer/web/wp_pingpreserver/
is this useful in WP 2.3?",Denis-de-Bernardy
Future Releases,12154,Updating a post modifies pingback timestamp,,Pings/Trackbacks,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-02-06T21:17:46Z,2010-06-14T00:29:42Z,"Steps to reproduce:[[BR]]
Create blog post 1. Publish. [[BR]]
Create blog post 2. From within the post body, link to blog post 1. Publish. A pingback comment is created for post 1, with the timestamp as for blog post 2.[[BR]]
Edit blog post 2. Do not change publication timestamp. Save changes.
Expected behaviour: Pingback is not affected.[[BR]]
Actual behaviour: Pingback timestamp is changed - instead of the publication time of blog post 2, it is now set to the time when I edited blog post 2.",htoomik
Future Releases,12582,user_registered action suggestion,westi,Plugins,2.9.2,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-03-11T11:10:48Z,2010-06-23T17:26:12Z,"I am developing theme that should include user login / registration (so we dont have to see wp-login.php ever again).
Now for login it was easy - with the help wp_login_url user is redirected back to whatever page we need after login.
To achieve same thing for registration i added new action in wp-login.php
{{{
$errors = register_new_user($user_login, $user_email);
do_action('user_registered', array($user_login, $user_email, $errors));
}}}
using this action now i can make wp-login.php redirect user to main page and display errors there.
Maybe this could be included in wordpress? Or maybe wp_login_url type function that can redirect user wherever needed? I would personally go with action as it gives much more freedom.",roxaz
Future Releases,14769,"API for ""Settings"" action link on plugins.php",,Plugins,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2010-09-02T22:10:35Z,2010-12-07T23:12:33Z,"Plugins should be able to register a ""Settings"" actions link that will then take them to their plugin settings page.
We should try to hook into add_options_page() as well, just by taking the first one that the plugin registers. Probably not really doable to ascertain which plugin calls that function however, without running a backtrace. Maybe try matching the slug with the plugin basename.
Someone is encouraged to run with this before I get to it.",nacin
Future Releases,15514,Category/Tag Converter should include Post Format conversions,,Plugins,,normal,normal,WordPress.org,feature request,new,,2010-11-20T03:13:53Z,2013-01-17T17:10:01Z,"The category/tag converter should include the ability to convert categories or tags to post formats.
The converter in general needs a pretty serious UI or code cleanup, so if anyone wants to own this, that would be awesome, and I will assist.",nacin
Future Releases,11418,Allow adding post thumb via url,,Post Thumbnails,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2009-12-13T11:05:05Z,2010-01-05T20:57:07Z,currently it is only possible to add post thumbs from blog's gallery,pascal.herbert
Future Releases,15218,Publish box (inner-sidebar) hidden in custom posts without show_ui,,Post Types,3.0.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-10-26T08:18:19Z,2010-12-08T20:17:16Z,"I'm pretty sure this is a bug as I can't figure out a reason for the following:
----
Create a new custom post type with '''show_ui => true''' ''(which is supposed to hide the menus for it if false)''. Create a post, go to the post edit screen. Now edit the plugin code and '''switch true to false''' for '''show_ui'''. Hit refresh and the inner-sidebar is gone.
----
Is this expected behavior and, if it is?!?!... how should it be handled? Some people need to manage the custom posts by themselves and not have then show up in the menu, trash can,... but they need the editor, scheduling and such.
Thanks a lot.",5ubliminal
Future Releases,13509,Searching doesn't return Private results to logged in users with read_private_ permissions,ryan,Post Types,2.9.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-05-24T00:31:11Z,2010-11-13T08:01:18Z,"When you do a search with these requirements...[[BR]]
- You are a registered user.[[BR]]
- You are logged in.[[BR]]
- You have '''''read_private_posts''''' permissions.
... you expect seeing in the results those Private posts that contains your query's terms.
But you end up with showing only the ones that belongs to you. I think the bug is in these lines:
{{{
if ( is_user_logged_in() ) {
$where .= current_user_can( ""read_private_{$post_type_cap}s"" ) ? "" OR $wpdb->posts.post_status = 'private'"" : "" OR $wpdb->posts.post_author = $user_ID AND $wpdb->posts.post_status = 'private'"";
}
}}}
As '''''$post_type_cap''''' is set to ""any"" when you do a search, the conditional expression always fails as it's asking for this:
{{{
current_user_can( ""read_private_anys"" )
}}}
... and ends up always in the second part of the conditional expression. That is:
{{{
"" OR $wpdb->posts.post_author = $user_ID AND $wpdb->posts.post_status = 'private'""
}}}
Thanks.",inbytesinc
Future Releases,14761,unregister_post_type(),,Post Types,2.9,lowest,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2010-09-02T12:00:17Z,2013-05-16T20:42:09Z,"Two use cases:
1. Remove a core post type. Means that the admin menus should respond in kind, though certain aspects of core like query/rewrite might not like this. Not the main use case regardless.
2. Removing a post type of another plugin, or potentially more likely, a parent theme.
Example barebones function: http://wordpress.pastebin.com/VexHkgig
Related, unregister_taxonomy() #11058 and unregister_taxonomy_for_object_type(): #14482",nacin
Future Releases,7605,Press This: Edit URL,noel,Press This,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-08-26T20:35:04Z,2010-08-19T22:40:44Z,It'd be nice if the Press This bookmarklet had the same edit URL capabilities as the Wordpress administration.,awayken
Future Releases,7604,Press This: Post auto-saving,noel,Press This,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-08-26T20:33:42Z,2010-08-19T22:41:12Z,It'd be nice if the Press This bookmarklet had the same autosave capabilities as the Wordpress administration.,awayken
Future Releases,17027,Allow WP_Query to return just the count,,Query,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-04-02T18:32:56Z,2011-04-02T18:32:56Z,"Currently, you can't ask just for the total number of posts for a certain query.
You have to execute that query and then retrieve the total using SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS.
Maybe a {{{'fields' => 'count'}}} option would do it.
Example where this is needed in Core: #17019",scribu
Future Releases,9470,Allow get_pages to get child pages of multiple pages,,Query,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-04-06T10:51:02Z,2012-10-30T20:14:27Z,"I'm doig a lot of WordPress CMS work, and am finding it increasingly annoying that i can only get the children of one page through get_pages.
It would be great if child_of could also, just like include and exclude, be a comma separated array of pages for which you want to fetch the children.",joostdevalk
Future Releases,12719,"Custom taxonomy with query_var set, gets taxonomy query_var appended anyway",dd32*,Query,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,accepted,,2010-03-26T12:42:16Z,2010-10-28T08:24:18Z,"In my browser address field, appending my WP url with ""?customtax=termslug"", the real WP query string gets changed to ""?customtax=termslug&taxonomy=customtax&term=termslug"".
This causes cases where I append two custom taxes in the URL to not work. E.g. ""?customtax1=termslug1&customtax2=termslug2"" would result in something like ""?customtax1=termslug1&taxonomy=customtax1&term=termslug1&customtax2=termslug2"" and not work.
If i two sets of custom taxonomies and slugs manually through a query_posts it works, and is not modified by WP.",Silkjaer
Future Releases,9978,Sticky Posts are not ordered correctly after selection,ryan,Query,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-05-29T23:14:06Z,2009-06-11T13:28:46Z,"In WP_Query, sticky posts are added/moved to the top of the posts array after everything else is selected and ordered according to the query parameters.
Sticky posts are loaded as a list of post_IDs from the database, according to the order they were marked as sticky.
Sticky posts that were not originally part of the returned posts are queried and added into the collection of sticky posts separately.
None of the handling of sticky posts, or the handling of the entire post array after stickies are added, is date ordered by date/title/whatever was requested.
Stickies need to be loaded/extracted into a separate array, ordered (independently) according to the original query, then added to the top of the post array.",beaulebens
Future Releases,14477,get_pages with child_of only works with uninterrupted hierarchies,,Query,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-07-30T19:00:50Z,2010-11-23T01:36:16Z,"I have a page X with several children and grandchildren. Some of the grandchildren have a certain meta key and value. I now want to fetch all pages under page X that have this meta key. After reading the documentation of ''get_pages'', I expected this to work with a single call of ''get_pages''.
But if I use get_pages like this:
{{{
get_pages('child_of=X&meta_key=A&meta_value=B');
}}}
it returns no pages at all (hierarchical=0 has no effect). It seems that's because ''child_of'' triggers a call of ''get_page_children'' which only returns uninterrupted hierarchies. Since the query returns only some grandchildren and no direct descendants, the function fails. IMHO, that's a bug.
",vividvisions
Future Releases,11398,new sort method for query_posts (order by last comment date),ryan,Query,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-12-11T15:44:42Z,2010-06-14T00:30:40Z,"I think we need sorting by latest post comment ability for query_posts. ""Recent comments"" plugins does this but we need this sorting in the core.
BBPress is planned as a WP plugin according latest chat logs posted by Matt. We gonna have to need this anyway.",erden.ozkan
Future Releases,12769,Disappearing posts/pages (in quickedit mode),,Quick/Bulk Edit,2.9.2,low,minor,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-03-30T08:53:39Z,2011-03-13T22:53:58Z,"Steps to reproduce:
1. Quickedit a post.
2. Click save and instanly click quick-edit on another post.
When the ajax-request completes the first quick-edited post will disappear from the posts table. This is only a display bug.",catahac
Future Releases,11302,Bulk editing posts should pre-fill fields with the same value,,Quick/Bulk Edit,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-12-01T20:48:41Z,2012-07-13T04:08:11Z,"All I need is quickly move some posts from one category to another.
How to simulate this problem:
Create 2 posts in Uncategorized category.
Check both of them - Bulk actions - Edit.
There is no category selected even if both posts are in Uncategorized. When I check Category1 and click Update, both posts are now in Uncategorized and also in Category1. But no chance remove them from Uncategorized with Bulk actions.",pavelevap
Future Releases,15637,Inline Edit Has No Hooks,,Quick/Bulk Edit,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-12-02T01:00:50Z,2012-05-11T11:23:26Z,"Currently, I am attempting to make it possible for an author to ""feature"" a post straight from the Quick Edit screen. I am looking in wp-includes/class-wp-posts-list-table.php and there are no hooks or actions for the Quick Edit screen so that I can add a checkbox or another input field in there.
I just want to add a checkbox to ""feature"" the post and then save it to the custom fields of that post, not too hard. But I need the do_action's to be there! Thanks!",sean212
Future Releases,14326,Renaming tags/categories causes unpredictable results,,Quick/Bulk Edit,3.0,lowest,trivial,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-07-16T02:39:14Z,2010-11-22T17:35:14Z,"When renaming a tag/category through quick edit, if the new title contains the character ' — ' (&8220;) the script produces unexplainable results.",kdizas
Future Releases,11472,Should QuickEdit remove posts from lists as needed?,,Quick/Bulk Edit,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-12-17T10:29:38Z,2013-01-21T23:51:08Z,"Create a draft post. Visit Posts / Edit, and quickedit the draft. Set its status to Published and save. It remains around, with the published status, instead of being removed from the list.
Reporting this just in case, as it might be a UI feature rather than a bug.
",Denis-de-Bernardy
Future Releases,12208,Add Quick Edit To Media Library,,Quick/Bulk Edit,,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2010-02-12T01:45:12Z,2013-04-12T16:28:27Z,"I am requesting that a quick edit link be added to the media in the media library like what is on the posts page. I would like to quickly be able to edit titles, alts, and captions at least.",queenofdiy
Future Releases,13382,_wp_post_revision_fields filter is not very useful,,Revisions,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-05-13T20:57:51Z,2013-01-21T14:48:16Z,"The _wp_post_revision_fields filter allows plugins to modify which post fields get revisioned (the default is title, content, excerpt).
It's pretty useless, though, since it's only run once and can't be changed by post_type. A custom post type, for example, might only want to enable revisions on the content.
The _wp_post_revision_fields() is also a variation on the getter/setter pattern (static variable) we use in a few places to avoid globals. It makes the function kind of crazy.
Proposal: Split into two functions
{{{
@var int|object|array $post post_id or post object or post array
@return array Fields to revision: array( field => i18n'd label )
function wp_get_post_revision_fields( $post ) {
// filter with _wp_post_revision_fields: pass post_id, post_type, ...?
// don't cache results
}
@internal
@var array $past post array
@return array Filled $post array with revision info
function _wp_post_revision_fields( $post ) {
$revisionable = wp_get_post_revision_fields( $post )
// ...
}
}}}
I'd like to see this in 3.0 if we can, but marking as 3.1 for now.",mdawaffe
Future Releases,16725,Inconsistent leading slash in WP_Rewrite,,Rewrite Rules,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-03-02T17:25:58Z,2011-03-02T17:25:58Z,"#16626 revealed an inconsistency in WP_Rewrite, where {{{$wp_rewrite->front}}} has a leading slash, but the final rules array doesn't.
This is caused by the fact that {{{$wp_rewrite->permalink_structure}}} itself has a leading slash.
Also note that {{{$wp_rewrite->search_structure}}} stands out as the only structure that doesn't have a leading slash.
This should be made consistent somehow.",scribu
Future Releases,12107,Author role overrides edit image title set by editor,,Role/Capability,2.8.6,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-02-01T01:56:49Z,2010-11-13T07:42:50Z,"If assigned as 'Author' as Role in Wordpress User Setting, Author cannot add or edit the 'Edit Image Title' field for any images (even though they upload themselves)
Furthermore, if there is an existing text in 'Edit Image Title' field, and if Author 'Save Draft' or 'Update Post' (without doing any editing at all), the Image Title will be removed.
In other words, only the Roles of 'Admin' and 'Editor' are able to add Image Titles to images. The Role of 'Author' cannot add image titles and not only that, by accessing and saving a post, any existing Image Titles added by Admin or Editor becomes removed.
I tested on Wordpress version 2.8.6 and 2.9.1
I have previously posted a thread on the support forum here http://wordpress.org/support/topic/356199?replies=1#post-1365412",noyu
Future Releases,12061,Treatment of shortcodes by wpautop is incomplete,,Shortcodes,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-01-28T02:27:18Z,2013-01-19T08:36:17Z,"There are a number of issues that arise when shortcodes are embedded in a block of content that is filtered by wpautop. After studying the issue, I have come to the conclusion that the underlying issue is that a shortcode can result in a block-level HTML element or an inline snippet of HTML. Neither wpautop nor shortcode_unautop have the information necessary to know what the intended to be block-level or text-level, which results in
tags to appear in places where they were not intended and causes invalid markup when paragraphs are not closed properly.
1) shorcodes when registered need to state the display type of the html that they return (inline or block). In addition, the javascript version of filters need to be provided with the same data.
2) An alternate mechanism for handling shortcodes prior to wpautop needs to be implemented. To maintain a separation between wpautop and shortcodes, temporarily replacing block-level shortcodes with unique tokens, running wpautop, running wpautop on the content of the shortcode (since this is a separate filter, plugins can disable it on a per shortcode basis), and then replacing the token with shortcodes post-wpautop.
As WP and plugin authors use shortcodes more and more, I think this is an issue that should not be left to the wayside. Shortcodes especially tied to tinymce buttons make working with WordPress easier for the average content producer.
",gcorne
Future Releases,18776,balanceTags should ignore shortcodes & their content,,Shortcodes,3.2.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2011-09-26T11:26:10Z,2012-04-27T19:44:20Z,"Take following input:
{{{
something [myshortcode][/myshortcode]
}}}
after `balanceTags()` it becomes:
{{{
something [myshortcode][/myshortcode]
}}}
Well, this is not what the shortcode creator probably wanted.
'''Proposed fixes:'''
If you are feeling lazy: Convert `[.*]` to `<$1>` and since balanceTags handles XML it should work, afterwards convert appropriate `<>` back to `[]`. Though this does not give a shortcode creator chance to disallow balancing tags inside it's content which is bad.
Better fix is to allow shortcode creators to decide wether their contents should be balanced:
1. `balanceTags()` should ignore all shortcodes and their contents.
2. Parse all shortcodes in content and on each shortcode call apply filter on so that shortcode creator can hook (if sees it appropriate) on to that. Shortcode creator then can call `balanceTags()` in his filter of that shortcode in order to run `balanceTags()` ''contents of shortcode'' separately if wanted.",ciantic
Future Releases,13606,Comma's in taxonomy term names make them unpickable,,Taxonomy,,normal,major,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-05-28T21:10:02Z,2010-11-13T03:19:01Z,"In the taxonomy term adder/editor, you are allowed to put comma's in their names, but the JS picker thinks they are two separate terms separated by a comma.
Two possible obvious solutions:
1.) Disallow terms from having commas in the names
2.) Fix the JS",johnjamesjacoby
Future Releases,11156,Duplicate tag created if tag name contains ampersand,filosofo,Taxonomy,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2009-11-16T21:51:37Z,2010-11-13T07:25:30Z,"This is undoubtedly an edge case, but here's what happened:
1. I created a tag with a long name that contained an ampersand. Gave it a shorter slug than the one WP generated.
2. Tagged some posts.
3. While the server was running slow, the autocomplete never came up, and I tagged another post by cutting and pasting the tag name from another screen.
That resulted in a new tag being created with a longer WP-generated slug, instead of the post getting tagged with my older existing tag.
This happened a few times (the server in question is REALLY slow), and I finally realized that the only tags that were incorrectly duplicated were the ones with ampersands.",sillybean
Future Releases,14093,"Malformed category hidden from edit-tags, but shows in meta box",,Taxonomy,,low,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-06-25T19:11:49Z,2011-01-13T08:07:15Z,"Came from a report in IRC by xomp.
In the following example, category 1's parent is category 2, and vice versa.
{{{
mysql> select term_taxonomy_id, term_id, taxonomy, parent from wp_term_taxonomy;
+------------------+---------+---------------+--------+
| term_taxonomy_id | term_id | taxonomy | parent |
+------------------+---------+---------------+--------+
| 1 | 1 | category | 2 |
| 2 | 2 | category | 1 |
| 3 | 3 | category | 0 |
| 4 | 4 | category | 1 |
+------------------+---------+---------------+--------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> select term_id, name from wp_terms;
+---------+-----------------+
| term_id | name |
+---------+-----------------+
| 1 | Category 1 |
| 2 | Category 2 |
| 3 | Category 3 |
| 4 | Category 4 |
+---------+-----------------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
}}}
On edit-tags, you'll see only Category 3.
In the hierarchical meta box, you'll see:
{{{
Category 3
Category 1
- Category 2
- Category 4
}}}
If we decide to show corrupted data, we should be consistent. At the very least, edit-tags should reveal more than the meta box, not the other way around.",nacin
Future Releases,5358,Queried object on multiple tag query holds only first tag,ryan,Taxonomy,2.3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2007-11-15T05:17:21Z,2013-01-28T14:01:36Z,"On tag page results when two or more tags are queried ('''/tags/foo,bar''' -or- '''/tags/foo+bar'''), only the first tag is in the queried object. So a simple:
{{{ print_r($wp_query->get_queried_object()); }}}
outputs a single associative array of the first tag referenced in the query. One would expect to find an array of all tags in the queried object.",Kafkaesqui
Future Releases,14399,get_term_children doesn't call clean_term_cache() if necessary,,Taxonomy,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2010-07-23T13:32:11Z,2011-01-15T02:01:34Z,"1. Create a taxonomy on something 'non standard'[[BR]]
2. Create a (parent) term.[[BR]]
3. Create a child term. [[BR]]
4. Retrieve child terms of the parent term using, amongst others, get_term_children().
Roughly:
{{{
register_taxonomy( 'where-you-live', 'user', array('hierarchical' => true, 'show_ui' => true, 'query_var' => true, 'label' => __('Where they live')) );
$country = 'USA';
$state = 'New York';
$tax_country = wp_insert_term($country, 'where-you-live');
$country_term_id = $tax_country['term_id'];
wp_insert_term($state, 'where-you-live', array('parent'=>$country_term_id));
$state_terms = get_child_terms($country_term_id, 'where-you-live');
error_log(print_r($state_terms,1));
}}}
I am expecting an array containing the 'New York' child term, but I get nothing.[[BR]]
Have also tried get_terms() with child_of or parent args, which also fail (presumably for the same reason?).",miradev
Future Releases,13949,Add a sprintf style argument to wp_list_categories() for title tag.,,Taxonomy,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-06-17T18:01:20Z,2010-10-28T02:10:59Z,"By default, wp_list_categories() will use the value of $term->description for the title tag of every link that it generates. If the argument ""use_desc_for_title"" is set to false, it will produce a string like: ""View all posts filed under $term->name"". With the inclusion of custom post_types into core, it would be wonderful to have more control over this title. The best solution that I can think of is to add a sprintf style argument which will allow themes and plugins to provide a custom format. Something like:
'title_format' => 'View all tacos posted under %s.'
",mfields
Future Releases,22023,Remove UNIQUE for slug in wp_terms,,Taxonomy,2.3,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2012-09-27T20:23:10Z,2013-05-14T13:38:13Z,"To set us up for future changes to the taxonomy API, we should remove the UNIQUE key for 'slug' for wp_terms. Said future changes include:
* Splitting shared terms on update (#5809)
* Stop creating shared terms (#21950)
* Forcibly split remaining shared terms
* Merge wp_terms and wp_term_taxonomy (I can dream, right?)
The term_exists() check should prevent duplicate terms from ever being inserted (before, of course, we fix #5809 and #21950). But, this needs unit tests, particularly because there is a case where term_exists() breaks. See #17689, which blocks this ticket.",nacin
Future Releases,11576,The future of the 'uncategorized' category,,Taxonomy,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,assigned,,2009-12-23T14:32:42Z,2011-04-15T08:44:01Z,"Is there any plan for removing the 'Uncategorized' category, or at least removing its requirement? Some users want the ability to only show the_category() when the post is part of a real category. Also, with the introduction of custom taxonomies in 2.9, not all hierarchical taxonomies will have a default term, so this flexibility needs to be introduced anyway.
I'm curious why the default category was introduced in the first place? Was it solely for permalink handling?
If attachment:ticket:10122:hierarchical_metaboxes-2.patch is accepted (specifically handling hierarchical taxonomies as int) the following just needs to be added above the checkbox list to allow deselecting of all terms from the taxonomy:
{{{
]"" value="""" />
}}}
",prettyboymp
Future Releases,7740,Merge Tags,,Taxonomy,2.7,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,dev-feedback,2008-09-14T16:56:07Z,2011-10-18T23:46:10Z,"As mentioned in [http://wordpress.org/support/topic/163558 a support thread], tags can get cluttered over time with many different tags meaning basically the same thing. To clean up tagging the ability to merge tags would be a life saver.
The functionality I had in mind was being able to select two or more tags in edit-tags.php and select 'Merge' from the 'Actions' dropdown. When you click 'Apply' a lightbox would open with the following:
'''What should become the primary tag?'''[[BR]]
[Textfield][[BR]]
''The name is how the tag appears on your site.''
'''What should become the primary tag slug?'''[[BR]]
[Textfield][[BR]]
''The “slug” is the URL-friendly version of the name. It is usually all lowercase and contains only letters, numbers, and hyphens.''
'''Which slugs should continue to point to the new primary tag?'''[[BR]]
[Textarea automatically filled with the old slugs][[BR]]
''One slug per line.''
'''Save''' | '''Cancel'''
The last textarea allows old slugs to still point to the new primary tag - meaning any old URL's will still work.
=== -~- Example -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ===
I've got the following tags which all mean the same thing:
TV, the box, telly
I select them all in edit-tags.php, select 'Merge' and 'Apply'. In the popup box I choose 'television' as the primary tag, 'television' as the slug, and list the old tags in the textarea.
I now have a tag called 'television' which has ""television, TV, the box, telly"" all pointing to it, so my old URL's still work. All of my posts which use the old tags have now magically swapped to using 'television'.",hempsworth
Future Releases,16929,pass the $type_of_url context param on user_trailingslashit() for CPT's,,Template,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2011-03-22T08:42:09Z,2011-03-22T09:55:02Z,"Currently get_post_permalink() does not pass the context flag to user_trailingslashit(), this means that for custom post types, it's not possible to target them through the 'user_trailingslashit' filter.
It might be worth checking to see if taxonomies and any other uses of user_trailingslashit() pass the context as well.",dd32
Future Releases,4575,Add functions to return the last-modified timestamp of a category/tag,,Template,2.2.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2007-07-02T12:36:26Z,2009-08-07T18:46:45Z,"Hi,
All categories Last-Modified dates are the same, and thats a one big rss file i guess.
Is there a chance to send individual Last-Modified dates to these feed ?
Thanks",delusions
Future Releases,15516,Candidates for new template functions based on code in Twenty Ten,,Template,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-11-20T06:30:13Z,2010-11-20T07:11:25Z,There are several pieces of code in Twenty Ten which are candidates for abstraction into template functions. I'll make a list shortly and put it up here to get feedback.,johnbillion
Future Releases,14113,Function that could improve the current edit_post_link(),,Template,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-06-27T15:20:42Z,2010-10-28T05:37:38Z,"Basicly this function is the same than [http://core.trac.wordpress.org/browser/trunk/wp-includes/link-template.php#L820 edit_post_link()] but some little differences which can make it more useful for developers. So far it has two advantages:
'''1)''' The edit link can be easily returned.
'''2)''' It's possible to choose a class for link tags.
{{{
// Returned
function wp_get_edit_link($args = '') {
$defaults = array(
'link' => null,
'before' => '',
'after' => '',
'id' => 0,
'class' => 'post-edit-link'
);
$r = wp_parse_args($args, $predet);
extract($r);
if ( !$post = &get_post($id) )
return;
if ( !$url = get_edit_post_link($post->ID) )
return;
if (null === $link)
$link = __('Edit This');
$post_type_obj = get_post_type_object($post->post_type);
$link = 'labels->edit_item ) . '"">' . $link . '';
return $before . apply_filters('get_edit_link' , $link , $post->ID) . $after;
}
// Echoed
function wp_edit_link($args = '') {
echo wp_get_edit_link($args);
}
}}}
'''Example using the function:'''
Returning:
{{{
&after=&class=my-link-class&link=Edit me!');
echo $var;
?>
}}}
Echoing:
{{{
&after=&class=my-link-class&link=Edit me!'); ?>
}}}
Results on:
{{{
Edit me!
}}}",metacortex
Future Releases,9666,Pass object id in the various formatting filters,,Template,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-04-28T10:31:44Z,2012-10-30T20:50:38Z,"This is a consolidated ticket, in reference to #9319 and #5746.
Both were requests to pass either of $post or $post->ID as an argument to the_title (both have patches for that).
The same idea could be applied to multitudes of other formatting hooks. They're not always called in the loop, so determining the ID of the object (post, link, category, tag, etc.) isn't always easy in the event that it is useful.
Suggested enhancement:
each filter such as the_title, the_content, etc., but also the_permalink, the_category_link, etc., possibly also the_category, etc., as well... basically any hook that is formatting related and that affects an individual object rather than a collection, should have the object's ID as an argument for easy reference.",Denis-de-Bernardy
Future Releases,16268,Requirement for has_header_image() function?,,Template,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-01-17T12:05:24Z,2011-01-18T11:10:19Z,"I know is pretty easy to do, but would it be a good idea to provide a has_header_image() function for use in themes? Something along the lines of:
{{{
function has_header_image() {
$header_image = get_header_image();
return !empty( $header_image );
}
}}}
As the header_image() function just outputs the URL it would be handy to have a conditional function you could use to check when there was a header image to output.
I'm currently working on a plugin that gives you more granular control over using different header images on different pages using the 'theme_mod_header_image' filter. There may be instances when you do not want to show a header at all on some pages. In the current TwentyTen theme for example, no checking is done before the header_image() function is called so in this scenario the header image just appears as a broken image - ideally it should not output the image at all.
Either that or should there be a function which outputs the whole image tag so that if the header_image() function returns false/empty it does not output the tag at all?
What are people's thoughts on this?",husobj
Future Releases,9719,Please : a filter for $category object in get_the_category_list(),,Template,2.8,normal,minor,Future Release,feature request,reopened,,2009-05-04T09:09:10Z,2009-06-13T02:57:15Z,"To offer for one post more flexibility in how to display the names of categories in the_category() or in get_the_category_list() -file category-template line 166 - , is it possible to add a filter as the filter existing in wp_list_categories() . Useful to replace cat name by instance by image ''(iphone compatible theme)'' or to add translation in bilingual or multilingual theme ''(by instance with xili-language plugin)'' without re-creating specific function.
As in classes.php (line 1328), I suggest this modif with a filter named post_list_cats for the start of two loops present in get_the_category_list() (line 187 et 209)
{{{
foreach ( $categories as $category ) {
$cat_name = attr( $category->name);
$cat_name = apply_filters( 'post_list_cats', $cat_name, $category );
}}}
and inside the two loops, $category->cat_name replaced by $cat_name
with this filter it will be more coherent to treate cat list in one post or in sidebar for all posts
Many thanks
",michelwppi
Future Releases,9818,add a wp_notification functionality to output notices and errors on the front end,,Template,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,assigned,,2009-05-14T09:28:25Z,2010-07-06T22:43:20Z,"On occasion, a plugin needs to return some kind of feedback. It would be nice if a standard hook existed for this.
It could go something like this:
add_filter(wp_notification, foobar)
foobar() appends to an array of notification messages that get displayed to the user on the front end.
then, on page load:
- in wp_head if notifications is not empty, we add a style, wp_notification, that makes elements of this class invisible, and we load jQuery
- if do_action(wp_notification) is explicitly called on the page, we display the messages in there, without the class, and disable the notification on the wp_footer hook
- an action gets fired on wp_footer if do_action(wp_notification) is not called, and we use ajax to place the needed messages in a absolutely positioned div element, with a close button.
we could also add some kind of do_action(wp_commentform_notification), nearby the comments form, to output comment-related errors in their ""correct"" location as well.",Denis-de-Bernardy
Future Releases,17739,Comment prompt text is misleading,,Text Changes,3.2,lowest,trivial,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-06-10T01:24:54Z,2012-11-19T16:46:04Z,"The comment form says, ""Your email address will not be published.""
It can be deceptive b/c people assume it's used for some sort of verification, not that it goes to the site owner/comment moderator, who could very well decide to publish it if he/she happens to be an unethical jerk. People complain about this in support forums and elsewhere every now and then. Quite trivial issue compared to most tickets, but would be nice to take care of it.
Suggestions for better text welcome.",jane
Future Releases,9774,Warning: Division by zero in /wp-admin/custom-header.php on line 361 (and many more),,Themes,2.8,lowest,minor,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2009-05-09T18:54:43Z,2011-03-20T17:59:00Z,we might want to check if the needed defines are around and > 0 before allowing the custom-header.php to work.,Denis-de-Bernardy
Future Releases,14824,WordPress is not updating Theme option after making a theme a child theme by adding the line 'Template' to the child`s css without refreshing Theem activation,,Themes,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-09-09T23:27:35Z,2011-01-13T08:51:36Z,"Situation:
If you have 2 Themes on a 2 sites MultiSite install (each site is using one theme) and want to make one of them a child Theme of the other, you will go to one of them and add the line 'Template: NAME OF THE PARENT THEME' and save it.
After doing so the Child Theme will not inherit any Template Files from the parent until you deactivate/activate the Child Theme again.
Although it says in the ""Themes/Appereance"" section of the Child Themes backend 'CHILD THEME NAME uses templates from PARENT THEME NAME. Changes made to the templates will affect both themes.' even before deactivating/activating the Child Theme.
Looks like the template page might be checking the style.css and not update the option.",drale2k
Future Releases,19124,Add prompt on themes.php at end of available themes list,,Themes,3.3,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-11-03T02:43:49Z,2012-11-01T06:45:01Z,"For new users, getting a new theme is still overwhelming. Long-term we should overhaul the way the theme management area works, but short term we could add a blurb after the last available theme is listed to prompt user to search/browse for more themes to install.",jane
Future Releases,14932,Featured Images: No way to custom crop when used as headers,,Themes,3.0.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-09-22T09:59:34Z,2010-09-22T14:27:21Z,"Custom Headers have Custom Cropping
When a theme uses featured images for per-post headers you don't get that goodness.
Makes feature images more ghetto for custom headers than they should be.",westi
Future Releases,14341,Adjacent image disappears when a caption is added,,TinyMCE,,normal,major,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-07-17T23:53:02Z,2011-05-20T21:44:17Z,"If you place two images side by side inside a strong tag and then try to add a caption to one of the images, the other image disappears.
Tested in r15436.
To reproduce: [[BR]]
1) Open a new or existing post for editing [[BR]]
2) Place the sample code from below into the html editor [[BR]]
3) Switch to the visual editor and try to add a caption [[BR]]
---> You'll see the other image disappear
Here is a screencast example: http://screencast.com/t/OTNmNjQzN
Here is some sample code:
{{{
![]()
![]()
}}}",designsimply
Future Releases,11674,Caption Short Codes Don't Work,,TinyMCE,,normal,critical,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2009-12-30T19:07:55Z,2010-08-02T05:44:42Z,"I'm testing 2.9.1-RC1 now. If I create a post, add a gallery plus a captioned image beneath it, this is what shows up in the HTML editing view:
{{{
[gallery]
![]()
- Caption goes here
}}}",miqrogroove
Future Releases,6331,TinyMCE should have a code button,,TinyMCE,2.5,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,assigned,,2008-03-21T10:52:42Z,2009-10-25T11:23:00Z,"The html editor has a code button on the quicktags bar but TinyMCE doesn't.
This is the only missing feature from TinyMCE that makes me switch to the HTML view when writing my weekly digest posts.",westi
Future Releases,10596,Error when uploading zip package with parent and child themes,,Upgrade/Install,2.8.3,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),assigned,,2009-08-12T11:12:29Z,2012-01-06T12:30:14Z,"There's an error when you try to install a package containing parent and couple of child themes using zip package upload from the admin dashboard.
For example i got a 1 big directory called test_template which contains 1 folder test_parent and 3 folders test_child1, test_child2, test_child3. If i upload test_template directory using ftp everything's ok, but when i try to use theme uploader and zip package test_template.zip i get an error caused by not finding a style.css file inside of the test_template directory ... but when i add a style.css file to that directory installation goes fine but templates aren't working till i use ftp and delete that file from that directory. It's troublesome if someone is giving his templates to other users.",newkind
Future Releases,12031,Install do not check the magic_quote_sybase status,dd32,Upgrade/Install,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2010-01-26T00:27:25Z,2012-11-01T20:09:16Z,"MU Trac Ticket: http://trac.mu.wordpress.org/ticket/981
Just try to install on a server that it's magic_quote_sybase is on (okay for Oracle, but fatal for mysql) . It failed to update the wp-config.php and didn't set correctly the .htaccess. ",wpmuguru
Future Releases,15440,PCLZIP_ERR_BAD_FORMAT (-10) : Invalid archive structure during plugin update,,Upgrade/Install,3.0.1,low,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-11-16T15:53:13Z,2011-04-03T13:15:03Z,"Currently, as part of our JW Player plugin we include several player skins so that users can customize the look of the JW Player. These skins are packaged as zip archives.
For a while now we've been getting reports from our users having difficulty performing the automated update/install. These users are receiving a PCLZIP error which claims the plugin archive is invalid.
From looking at the source code I see that WordPress first attempts to use the ZipArchive PHP module to unzip plugin packages. This always works for users updating our plugin. If this is not available it then uses a fallback library called PCLZIP. After some experimentation, it seems that PCLZIP has difficulty unzipping archives that contain archives.
Is this a known issue from your experience? If so, is there a workaround other than removing the zip skins from our plugin package?",LongTail Video
Future Releases,13071,Update bubble appears only at the second load,dd32,Upgrade/Install,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-04-21T15:51:25Z,2011-04-03T10:54:48Z,"Change the version of a plugin and go directly to ''wp-admin/update-core.php'' page.[[BR]]
You will see the plugin update in the list but the bubbles on the menu appears only after a reload.
",ocean90
Future Releases,12671,Installer page doesn't check if MySQL tables were created successfully,,Upgrade/Install,2.9.2,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,assigned,,2010-03-22T17:47:33Z,2012-07-02T16:54:02Z,"When running the web-based setup script - My Mysql user didn't have create permissions so no tables were created but the message (underneath all the MySQL errors) said setup was successful.
I think it would be worth doing a check for no MySQL errors before proclaiming the installation a success.",thedotproduct
Future Releases,14393,Maintenance mode overkill. Please refine usage of it,,Upgrade/Install,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-07-22T22:12:14Z,2010-11-23T21:16:35Z,"Though many tickets have been posted about the Maintenance Mode not resolving, I think that the problem is on a different level.
It is unacceptable that even a failed upgrade of an inactive theme can break a complete Site or even Network. Case in point: I just followed the upgrade alert for an inactive theme, hosted on the WordPRess theme repository.
(Apparently it had an error (Incompatible Archive. PCLZIP_ERR_BAD_FORMAT (-10) : Unable to find End of Central Dir Record signature.) But the point is, this should not have put the entire network in maintenance mode for 10 minutes.
Maybe a check can be done for plugins, themes etc: if they are active, then maintenance mode can be used (though I am definitely not a fan of it anyway).",bike
Future Releases,9679,Move Plugin/Theme deletion to new WP_Upgrader class,DD32,Upgrade/Install,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-04-29T08:51:55Z,2009-05-10T21:16:43Z,"Expansion off #7875, The plugin/Theme deletions should be also handled by the Upgrader class.",DD32
Future Releases,15738,Automate Security Releases,,Upgrade/Install,,normal,trivial,Future Release,feature request,new,dev-feedback,2010-12-08T21:11:49Z,2012-12-03T23:27:46Z,"When security releases are published, several less tech-savvy users might neglect to update in fear of breaking their site. In reality, security/maintenance releases don't change the core API and shouldn't break anything*.
We should have an option (disabled by default) that allows these X.X.1-style security updates to happen in the background. This will keep sites updated and secure and (hopefully) prevent the inevitable ""I wanted to wait to install 3.0.2 and someone hacked my site while I was waiting"" support requests.
The option should be disabled by default, but when users are on the update screen they should see an option to ""install security releases automatically.""
Major releases should always require an explicit action from the user to update the site as they can break themes and plug-ins and could potentially update database schema.
* Except in the rare occasion where a developer hacks core.",ericmann
Future Releases,8754,Uploading images whose dimensions are greater than the maximum size allowed fail to generate thumbnails and no error/failure message is displayed.,,Upload,2.7,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2008-12-30T02:50:09Z,2011-08-05T08:31:26Z,"The process of uploading images that have dimensions (physical size) greater than the maximum size allowed by the global setting will fail part way through the process without an error or failure message being displayed.
Example: Uploading a JPEG image with a width of 625 pixels and height of 938 pixels. This physical size is greater than the maximum size allowed by the default WordPress configuration.
When uploading such an image using the ""Add an Image"" panel the the Flash uploader will stop with the upload progress bar at 100% and displaying ""Crunching…"". The Browser uploader will return a blank ""Add an Image"" panel display.
In both cases the images are uploaded to the appropriate directory on the server and appear when the post's media gallery is refreshed. Thumbnail images are not generated for these uploads. It appears the failure is before or during thumbnail generation.
Note: The maximum image dimension allowed for upload is not the same as the Administration > Setting > Media > Large Size: Max Width and Max Height settings. In my case these settings are both set at 1024 pixels (above the size of the image I am working with). It appears this control panel setting only impacts the HTML image tag attributes for posts, so as not to break the visual design with images that are wider than a layout allows.
Now you may ask what is the default maximum dimension for uploaded images. Unfortunately I cannot find my notes on where exactly the setting is in the WordPress code (it has no Web GUI access that I am aware of). I had changed this setting once to work around this problem and hoped 2.7 would have fixed the issue. It is a pain to track down as the location of this setting has changed over time as it moved to different files and functions with each new version of WordPress.
My understanding is that this maximum image dimension setting was set to prevent images over 3 megapixels from being uploaded since those are really big and readers shouldn't have to deal with such images. This is old thinking from before broadband and photo blogs took off.
See: http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/03/28/wordpress-thumbnail-size-limit-hack/
I think the default limit should be raised, but that would be a feature request. This ticket is to have error messages displayed.
",DRGDC
Future Releases,14459,Rotate Full Size Images on Upload,azaozz,Upload,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,reviewing,,2010-07-29T23:16:17Z,2013-01-06T08:52:07Z,"It may be worth a revisit to #7042. Some mobile devices that use WordPress for Android are not capturing images in the correct orientation, instead they are writing the EXIF orientation to the image instead (which is a standard method these days). In wp-android and other external clients that offer full size image upload, these images will not be rotated correctly upon upload.
Since most mobile users are on the go with no access to the wp-admin area to rotate the images themselves, it would work best if the image was rotated for them automatically.
Hopefully there's a solution that wouldn't strip the EXIF data, some way to copy the EXIF data before rotating, then save it back again?",mrroundhill
Future Releases,8234,Users with upload_files capability should be able to edit and delete uploaded files without having the edit_post/delete_post capability,,Upload,2.7,low,minor,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-11-15T22:17:14Z,2009-11-20T20:31:07Z,Users with upload_files capability are able to upload files but can't edit/delete his/her own uploaded files without having the edit_post/delete_post capability. Users capable to upload files should also be capable to edit/delete their own uploaded files.,olethomas
Future Releases,7491,thumbnail creation fails silently,,Upload,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-08-09T19:16:19Z,2010-03-06T16:13:08Z,"When thumbnail creation fails, it fails silently, with no indication why it fails. That is a real pain in the ass if you're trying to debug. Frankly, I assumed for months that thumbnailing just wasn't implemented yet- it was only because I noticed that it does work on ma.tt that I even went back and tried to debug the situation.
I'm still not succeeding in actually getting the thumbnailing working, for what it is worth- extensive googling suggested I should install libgd, which I've now done, but no helpful errors from wordpress means I'm just back at square one in terms of figuring out why it is breaking.
There are no other directly pertinent bugs, but #7039 and #1952 mention instances of silent failure being a problem and #2794 has a (now bitrotted) patch creating an error reporting system.
",tieguy
Future Releases,7580,Use Exif description to autofill the caption,,Upload,2.6,high,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2008-08-23T06:26:39Z,2011-11-19T19:58:35Z,"Hello,
I test a lot of softwares to create a Exif description for my pictures.
Like ""Exif Farm"" or other kind of this softwares.
But When I Upload this picure in wp 2.6 the description will not show!
but i have some picture from the web, and when i upload them, wordpress show the description of it automatically in description Box!
like this picture:
http://www.hinhxinh.com/data/media/8/Beijing_Olympic_2008_-___075.jpg
and show description on it correctly:
http://i33.tinypic.com/2yyqk1t.jpg
Please tell me:
the problem is from Wp,
Or My software is not original?
'''So What should i do to show Description Exif Data in wp Correctly?'''",mrmax
Future Releases,12720,Delete user and hook confusion when deleting users in Multisite,,Users,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-03-26T12:42:59Z,2010-06-23T17:24:58Z,"Currently:
The hook ''wpmu_delete_user'' fires when deleting user in Super Admin->Users.
The hook ''remove_user_from_blog'' when deleting user under site Users->Authors & Users.
In standard WP:
The hook ''delete_user'' is called when deleting users it should be the same in MultiSite when deleting from Super Admin->Users.
Or add new hooks and deprecate previous.
''delete_user_from_network'' for when deleting a user totally.
''delete_user_from_site'' for when deleting a user from a specific site. This is hook also then fires in non-MultiSite mode since that then corresponds to one site.",andreasnrb
Future Releases,13569,Odd edge case with shared user tables and custom admin username during install,,Users,,lowest,trivial,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-05-27T06:06:43Z,2010-11-13T08:04:31Z,"1. In install 1, run install.php and use a custom username (NOT called 'admin') and set the e-mail to email@example.com.
2. In install 2, before installing, set up shared user tables with install 1. Then run the installer. You won't have the ability to choose usernames (that's expected). Use the *same* email.
3. Click ""Install."" You'll get hit with a WP_Error object.
What's happening? The logic in wp_install() is to do a username_exists() against the username passed to it. If the user exists, it assumes that you're using shared user tables. Problem is, wp_install() is passed 'admin' from install.php (as that's the default, and you don't see the fields when custom user tables are setup), while your user is not called 'admin'. The e-mail address is already being used for another user however, so it is creating 'admin' and is failing on the duplicate e-mail address.
If the email address doesn't match any user, I imagine you'd instead get an 'admin' user in your second install, which you could promptly delete. I see no problem with that, as the alternatives are to pick which user should become an admin.
So, the fix would be to change username_exists() and the logic that follows, and instead match the e-mail address with an existing user, and make that user the new administrator. If no user with that email exists, we create an admin user and they can tough it out.
I do not feel this is a blocker at all. The symptoms I am seeing should be the same in 2.9.2 if you removed the admin user in install 1, then proceeded to share user tables with install 2 before installing.
It'd be nice to at least prevent the fatal error and allow the install to finish, however. I do want to get to it in 3.0 if I can, since we now are allowing custom admin names. That said, setting to 3.1.",nacin
Future Releases,11959,Value Truncation Still Unchecked in registration.php,,Users,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-01-20T22:59:50Z,2010-11-13T07:38:28Z,"Functions such as username_exists() fail to perform sanity checks against the storage schema. As a result, it is possible to register multiple users with the same username, if the length is greater than or equal to the username field size. Only the first user can login, however anyone re-registering that username can impersonate the first user to reset their password.",miqrogroove
Future Releases,12393,Hooks to enable custom login without editing core files,,Users,2.9.2,low,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-02-26T21:01:06Z,2010-04-23T18:32:10Z,"One of the basic features of wordpress is to avoid having users edit core files.
It is impossible to properly customise wp-login without manually editing the file directly - not good for upgrades!
Need to make login_header function pluggable or add a do_action hook before the tag
Need to add a login_footer.
In fact what is required was highlighted in #4478 complete with diff file. This was marked as resolved BUT IT WAS NOT! I agree it might be a duplicate of issue #9682 BUT the underlying issue of being able to overwrite the login-header function WAS **NOT** solved.
(see recent support forum requests #252094 and #333994)
The solution MUST allow a replacement of login header (and even better also a replacement of the
There is a couple of things, which make for me sense together (and I am not sure, of course, whether they will make sense to you as well), and which I would like to record here.
“For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.” (J. 3:17) In some aspects and for some people (like me) and in certain moments, this is even more important than the previous verse, and yet it is quite rarely mentioned in the Church. Maybe because it so clear, that nobody gets much fame to explain (and there is not much to explain here?). For all of us, who live with the idea of God-policeman, following our doings to punish severely any small misstep, this is the good news.
There is quite certainly something significantly wrong about preaching, that we always quote only (John 3:16) and we don’t continue one verse further. As if we are still more interested in what’s there in gospel for me, and we don’t understand, that we are not the central figures in whole Bible. Not that there wouldn’t be anything there for us, but … that’s another long discussion I would like to have with Dave.
Text Here
More Text Here }}} The HTML source saves correctly, but the page output omits the closing tag for the second P element, causing the rest of the page to be invalid. If you have any trouble reproducing this I will be happy to debug it on my server.",miqrogroove Future Releases,4857,More issues with wpautop(),mdawaffe*,Formatting,2.3,low,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),accepted,needs-unit-tests,2007-08-29T06:47:01Z,2009-11-28T06:33:01Z,"''Not sure if this should slide into 2.3 or if it can wait for 2.4. Change as need be.'' `wpautop()` has issues with closing ``'s when it comes to HTML. For example: {{{ FooFoo
this is a small quoteNext Text }}} Then you have to save the comment. If you validate the your publish, you will see, that the sentence ""Thank you for your comment!"" will be put into the following absurd tags: [[BR]] {{{ p>Thank you for your comment!
}}} If you write a comment with the following code (hit return after the word ''comment! ''),[[BR]] {{{ Thank you for your comment!
this is a small quoteNext Text }}} you will get the right codeform when you validate your comment: {{{
Thank you for your comment!
}}} The same Problem exists when you type [[BR]] {{{ test 2break
next text }}} After the word ''test 2'' you will miss the . [[BR]] WordPress has got this bug with every single elements like these one: {{{,
- ,
- ,
bis
,
,etc. }}} When you make manuell a new line in front of these elements, you won't find any problem, so WordPress must put an automatic line break in front of these elements and it doesen't do it. Please fix this nerved bug!! regards, Dunkelangst from http://www.dunkelangst.org/ ",Dunkelangst Future Releases,6984,wpautop() formats the the contents of shortcodes,,Formatting,2.6,low,trivial,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2008-05-17T10:34:02Z,2009-11-28T07:20:24Z,"`wpautop()`, the bane of my existence as a plugin developer, is at it again. Here's an example of some PHP wrapped in a valid shortcode in a post of mine: {{{ [code lang=""php""]$text = str_replace( array('
', '
'), array('', '
'), $text);[/code] }}} The content that gets passed to my shortcode function is this: {{{ $text = str_replace( array('', '
'), array('
', '
'), $text); }}} Expected result: it shouldn't touch the insides of valid shortcodes (like adding line breaks or anything as it is doing now).",Viper007Bond Future Releases,5250,wpautop() issue with lists,,Formatting,2.3,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2007-10-24T00:32:38Z,2011-07-30T15:34:50Z,"First of all, my sincere apologies if this is a duplicate. The problem, in short: WordPress inserted a number of unclosed `
` tags into my post. It should either insert correctly closed tags, or none at all. I honestly would prefer the former. In detail: I had HTML code very similar to this:
- text
- subtext
- text
- subtext
more text
` tag in the above, which is unclosed (making the W3C validator choke on my website). Also note, I was not using the WYSIWYG editor (turning it off was the first thing I did), so it's unlikely to be due to that. As a workaround, manually inserting properly closed `
` tags works just fine:
- text
- subtext
more text
}}} So, two/three issues: - wpautop should also ignore double object tags, and html comments - wptexturize should ignore html comments",Denis-de-Bernardy Future Releases,8213,WP text formatting functions handle block-level INS tag incorrectly,markjaquith*,Formatting,2.7,low,minor,Future Release,enhancement,accepted,,2008-11-14T14:51:09Z,2009-06-11T14:26:44Z,"From W3C documentation: ""INS and DEL are used to markup sections of the document that have been inserted or deleted with respect to a different version of a document (e.g., in draft legislation where lawmakers need to view the changes). These two elements are unusual for HTML in that they may serve as either BLOCK-LEVEL or INLINE elements (but not both). They may contain one or more words within a paragraph or contain one or more block-level elements such as paragraphs, lists and tables."" ---- When I want to use INS tag as BLOCK-LEVEL element (to wrap to paragraphs for example) wrong HTML is produced: {{{First paragraph.
Second paragraph.
}}} Correct HTML should look like this: {{{First paragraph.
Second paragraph.
}}} I think the same sitiuation occurs for DEL tag. ",misieg772 Future Releases,5161,balance_tags option should not be in the user interface,,Formatting,2.3,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2007-10-08T08:02:49Z,2013-01-22T01:19:58Z,"In the WP Admin → Options → Writing ({{{options-writing.php}}}), there is an option ""!WordPress should correct invalidly nested XHTML automatically"" which controls whether {{{balance_tags()}}} is run on post content or not. I'm fully supportive of this feature — I think it's important to ensure the HTML that is output to browsers is valid. There have been a few situations where users needed to turn this off, e.g. bugs in the function, or a plugin misbehaves with it on (if I remember correctly, runPHP). However, this is a KDE-style option where it is put there for a niche case. In 99% of cases, you will want it on. A few people on the mailing lists have stated a number of times that we should take a GNOME-like approach to these sort of features, and let them be controlled only by plugins. This option is left over from the dark ages of !WordPress, and I don't think the cases for turning it off are big enough to warrant its inclusion in the user interface. If a plugin has a problem with balancing tags (e.g. runPHP), the offending plugin can simply remove the filter. {{{ remove_filter('content_save_pre', 'balance_tags); }}} (...or whatever the code would be.) The new canonical redirect feature has far more many problems, and far more justification for it to be turned off, yet I don't see a checkbox ""Redirect links to their canonical URL"" anywhere in the user interface. If anything should have a checkbox, it's the canonical redirect feature — but, it doesn't have any such thing. So, we should remove this checkbox as well.",JeremyVisser Future Releases,10489,UI Improvements for the gallery tab (edit post),,Gallery,2.8.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-07-26T11:52:10Z,2010-10-28T08:48:06Z,"It would be nice to ever display the ""Gallery Settings"" Section on the gallery tab, even if only one image exists. That would help if you talk via phone and explain someone something. Often from-sections are helpfull to validate wether or not the other is on the same page as you are while explaining something. ",hakre Future Releases,16230,Category slugs not cut at 200 characters as it should under some conditions,,General,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2011-01-14T14:10:23Z,2011-07-17T02:21:27Z,"When a category name is longer than 200 characters, it is cut to 200 and so is the slug automatically created upon category creation. Now, if you edit the category name or slug afterwards, again trying to set a name longer than 200 characters it is cut again. But, if you edit the name or slug and use a very long string like this one: %d1%85%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%bd%d0%b0/%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%86%d0%b5%d0%bf%d1%82%d0%b8/%d0%b4%d0%b5%d1%81%d0%b5%d1%80%d1%82%d0%b8-%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%86%d0%b5%d0%bf%d1%82%d0%b8-%d1%85%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%bd%d0%b0/%d1%81%d0%bb%d0%b0%d0%b4%d0%ba%d0%b8%d1%88%d0%b8-%d0%b4%d0%b5%d1%81%d0%b5%d1%80%d1%82%d0%b8-%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%86%d0%b5%d0%bf%d1%82%d0%b8-%d1%85%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%86%d0%b5%d0%bf%d1%/ Then the slug ends up being longer than the 200 chars limit. Now if on the Categories list dashboard page you have more categories than visible on one page, and the category you edited above is not on page 1, the page it is on will appear empty (while successive pages will be all right if they contain regular categories) This has been reproduced on 3.1-RC2-17283",paolal Future Releases,2691,HTML comments in posts aren't handled properly.,,General,2.8.5,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2006-04-25T03:16:37Z,2011-02-28T06:45:22Z,"When an HTML comment is added in a post, autop adds paragraph () tags around the comment and for multi-line comments line breaks (
) are added after every line. This should not happen in HTML comments. This ticket is similar to #712 which was closed with wontfix. I would like to know why this isn't seen as an issue? It prevents the addition of RDF and other metadata, not to mention just plain old HTML comments in posts.",gord Future Releases,14581,No magic numbers,,General,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-08-10T15:57:59Z,2010-11-26T21:54:49Z,Add defines for the numeric user_status and comment_status values.,ryan Future Releases,14745,Renaming a Link-Category Resets Link Widget Options of that Category,,General,,low,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-08-31T13:21:50Z,2010-12-27T17:42:30Z,"When renaming the name of a Link Category that is used as well in a Link Widget, the Link Widget stops working. Step to Reproduce: 1. Create a Link Category ""Test Start"". 2. Add 10 Links into the Category ""Test Start"". 3. Go to the Widgets Screen and add a new Link Widget to a sidebar. 4. Select that Link-Widget and set it from ""All-Links"" to the Category ""Test Start"". 5. Visit your Frontpage so proof that the Widget displays. 6. Go to the Link Cagegory Editor and quick-edit the ""Test Start"" Category. 7. Rename it to ""Test End"". 8. Save Changes. 9. Visit your Frontpage. ''=>>'' The Widget has disappeared. '''Expected behavior:''' Widget displaying with the (renamed) link category. ",hakre Future Releases,11414,Sidebar Calendar Widget broken,,General,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,reporter-feedback,2009-12-12T22:33:24Z,2010-11-13T07:31:07Z,"I'm giving 2.9 beta a test drive for theme development purposes. On my test installation, I currently have the two default themes and a very simple theme of my own that I developed via a tutorial. After I upgraded to 2.9 beta, the sidebar calendar started displaying rather oddly. It looks okay when the main page first loads, but when I click the <wp_list_pages SHOULD return nothing, but instead it displays all child pages of the first parent page ID in the ""exclude"" attr (here: 3). Now we now add the ""exclude_tree"" attr just for fun: 2) wp_list_pages('title_li=&depth=1&exclude=3,5,7&exclude_tree=3,5,7'); => should again return nothing, but instead, it displays the first-ever published child page globally (here: a child page of 5). It looked like random behavior at first but I've been able to identify the above pattern. I'm guessing it's a failing condition somewhere in the function.",bobsoap Future Releases,11642,Allow to define upload path and url in wp-config.php,,General,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-12-27T11:11:35Z,2012-09-28T11:44:33Z,"When someone wants to move default directories elsewhere, he/she must do work in two places: add defines to wp-config.php and change upload path on settings page. I think it will be good to introduce two new defines: UPLOAD_PATH and UPLOAD_URL_PATH. When they will be defined, WordPress should use them and do not allow to change these on settings page - similarly to home and site url options.",sirzooro Future Releases,23168,Introduce remove_post_status,,General,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2013-01-10T08:32:49Z,2013-05-10T12:37:37Z,Plugins and themes should be able to remove the default post statuses defined by core.,kovshenin Future Releases,14946,Only enforce OEmbed whitelisting for dangerous types,,General,3.0.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2010-09-23T08:23:48Z,2010-11-23T21:14:44Z,"Of the four OEmbed response types, only two (video and rich) are potentially dangerous. We should be able to allow all photo and link responses, without a whitelist.",markjaquith Future Releases,7745,Private posts cannot have unpublished or pending review status,,General,2.6.1,low,minor,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-09-15T16:32:19Z,2013-01-22T16:46:33Z,"Posts with private ticked are immediately set to published, and cannot be reverted to unpublished or pending review while private is ticked. Given the default use of private posts, this behavior is understandable, but it seems far simpler if the behavior remained consistent with public posts. In our particular case, we are using Role Manager to allow subscribers to read private posts. A simple solution that suits our particular needs well. But we really need the full draft/review process, just as with public posts.",nyoungman Future Releases,9785,Search Enhancements -- consolidated ticket,,General,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-05-10T23:54:34Z,2012-06-25T01:47:24Z,"Closing the following as dups, pending ""the big search overhaul"" that may never come: - #5149 -- search everywhere (with committed patch) - #9230 -- search in post and pages and both - #5525 -- also search for posts with search query as terms (tags, cats, ...) - #5054 -- allow to negate keyword on search - #7394 -- assign greater weight to posts with search query in title - #7647 -- search in attachment descriptions",Denis-de-Bernardy Future Releases,17780,Use PHP native double encoding prevention in htmlspecialchars(),,General,,low,minor,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-06-13T08:03:13Z,2011-06-13T08:03:13Z,"Since PHP 5.2.3 the {{{htmlspecialchars()}}} function has an optional {{{$double_encode}}} parameter, which we could use. This can save us a few expensive kses/html decoding calls. We need to make sure it works the same way as our implementation.",nbachiyski Future Releases,16867,Where is it appropriate to use filter_var,,General,3.2,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,reopened,,2011-03-16T16:47:13Z,2012-02-08T14:22:28Z,"Now that we require PHP 5.2 we have access to a whole plethora of new functions. One of those is [http://php.net/filter_var/ filter_var]. It seems like this could be useful for things like validating and filtering E-Mail addresses, URLs, IPs, etc. (there are plenty of [php.net/manual/en/filter.filters.php filters]). This was brought up in #15379 where nacin said: Those can be buggy. We could potentially leverage it internally but we need to watch out for vulnerabilities and what not across PHP versions. I mostly wanted this to be the place where we decide what could benefit from it and what shouldn't.",aaroncampbell Future Releases,13436,Wordpress class_exists() conflicts with __autoload() and php_auto_prepend,,General,3.1,normal,minor,Future Release,enhancement,reopened,,2010-05-18T15:51:26Z,2010-12-14T17:42:54Z,"== Issue == Wordpress core (and many plugins) use class_exists(). http://php.net/manual/en/function.class-exists.php When Wordpress is integrated with custom/third party applications that use php_auto_prepend and autoload() to include/require files based on the $class_name parameter this generates errors as class_exists() triggers the autoload() and the files cannot be found. == To reproduce == Using php_auto_prepend specify a file to include before every page request that contains the following PHP code: {{{ }}} Visit any front-end or back-end Wordpress page. == Solution == As there is no autoload() function defined in Wordpress core the class_exists() should implement the second class_exists() parameter: {{{ }}} This stops calls to __autoload() and would fix the errors seen when integrating Wordpress with apps that implement this. I have implemented this and tested it and Wordpress works fine, but I can't find out where the SVN repo is for Wordpress 3 Beta 2 (the SVN page on the site takes me to 2.x). If someone could supply a link for SVN CO of WP3 I can provide the patch.",galbus Future Releases,14653,Log IP address un UserMeta when account is created,,General,,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,dev-feedback,2010-08-20T01:41:24Z,2010-10-28T10:18:48Z,"As WordPress becomes more and more a CMS for everything, not just blogs, managing users becoms more important. With MultiSite and user registration more open, WordPress should have a built in way to record the IP address of a user. So at registration, log the IP in usermeta. Done, easy. List it on the user page. At comments, obviously, it's already logged, so nothing needs be done there. Also, since you can already click on an IP and list all comments made from that address, there wouldn't be much else that needs to be done.",Ipstenu Future Releases,16870,consider disabling HTTP transport after multiple failed requests,,HTTP,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2011-03-16T23:18:45Z,2011-07-16T23:31:02Z,"There has been a number of reports over the lifespan of the cURL HTTP transport failing with an error during upgrades: {{{ WP HTTP Error: name lookup timed out }}} This is a common error from cURL on badly configured installations (specifically, IIRC it lacks DNS Resolving in cURL, sometimes it just required an extended amount of time to resolve, others, it simply can't resolve) Like we do with fsockopen() I think it'd be worth disabling the cURL transport for x hours when it hits this particular error condition.. Related threads: http://wordpress.org/support/topic/dashboard-issues-rss-error-wp-http-error-name-lookup-timed-out and http://wordpress.org/support/topic/plugins-update-failure Both old threads, so this may only affect a PHP4 version of cURL.. For tracking purposes, I've finally created this ticket.",dd32 Future Releases,15677,It is not possible to install multiple variants of the same language,,I18N,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-12-04T15:07:28Z,2011-06-04T10:21:10Z,"Because of the way {{{mu_dropdown_languages()}}} and {{{format_code_lang()}}} work, it is impossible to have multiple variants of the same language installed. The list of languages returned by {{{mu_dropdown_languages()}}} only includes one variant of each language (the one with the country code which comes last when sorted alphabetically). For example, if .mo files for es_ES and es_PE are both installed, then only es_PE will be shown. Furthermore, whatever variant of the language is installed, the name will be the same, not indicating the correct language variant. In the example above, the language name will be ""Spanish; Castillian"", even for the es_PE localisation. This is highly misleading. A final problem is that the langauge names are not localised themselves, with the exception of ""English"". The cause of these problems is the fact that {{{format_code_lang()}}} ignores the country code and only considers the language code when choosing the name to return. Furthermore, it returns hardcoded language names rather than translated names. Since {{{mu_dropdown_languages()}}} uses the return value of {{{format_code_lang()}}} as the key for its internal {{{$output}}} array, this means that later language variants overwrite earlier ones.",caesarsgrunt Future Releases,7837,Localization of numbers should be supported,,I18N,,low,minor,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2008-10-06T16:46:16Z,2009-11-23T15:21:12Z,"I'm new to WordPress so please bear with me: I believe localization of numbers should be added to WordPress features. This means that, if you install WordPress and use (for example) Arabic language packs, numbers should be shown using Arabic digits, not English digits.",huji Future Releases,14981,Two i18n misses,,I18N,3.3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-09-27T23:21:29Z,2012-02-07T22:40:08Z,"1) /wp-admin/nav-menus.php: the ""Most Recent"" string (/wp-admin/includes/nav-menu.php:645) should be separated between the Pages context and the Articles context, since they can take different forms according to the language (i.e.: in French, ""Articles"" is masculine, ""Pages"" is feminine. 2) /wp-admin/edit.php: Same contextual need for ""All"", ""Published"", ""Scheduled"" and the rest of the per-status selector, for posts and articles (and others...). ",xibe Future Releases,20738,Improve Javascript Word Counting for TinyMCE,,I18N,3.4,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2012-05-23T21:07:54Z,2012-05-30T13:57:17Z,"This is a follow on from #8759 to further improve the code. While we improved it in 3.4 we can do a better job to more fully support the customisation for all different locales. For know issues see the comments on the previous ticket.",westi Future Releases,17120,Class WP_Importer references STDIN which is not available in Web Environments,,Import,3.0,low,minor,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2011-04-13T09:58:12Z,2011-04-13T09:58:12Z,"STDERR is not defined in web environments (only certain CLI environments), you can call fopen('php://stderr'); directly, however this is not delivered to browsers. Since this is in the Multisite code, CLI imports might be more common, but it's not a given that multisite imports will not be run from the web either. Code ref: http://core.trac.wordpress.org/browser/trunk/wp-admin/includes/class-wp-importer.php#L128 {{{ 126 $blog = 'http://' . preg_replace( '#^https?://#', '', $blog_id ); 127 if ( ( !$parsed = parse_url( $blog ) ) || empty( $parsed['host'] ) ) { 128 fwrite( STDERR, ""Error: can not determine blog_id from $blog_id\n"" ); 129 exit(); 130 } 131 if ( empty( $parsed['path'] ) ) 132 $parsed['path'] = '/'; 133 $blog = get_blog_details( array( 'domain' => $parsed['host'], 'path' => $parsed['path'] ) ); 134 if ( !$blog ) { 135 fwrite( STDERR, ""Error: Could not find blog\n"" ); 136 exit(); 137 } }}} I'm unsure of the best way to tackle this, Ideally in a CLI environment we want the error outputs going to STDERR, but since that's not available or visible to web browsers, wp_die() would be a better choice. One potential method would be to direct wp_die() to STDERR in CLI environments - That might cause problems with the test suite however (I'm unsure)",dd32 Future Releases,19764,Invalid JSON in custom fields meta value after export,,Import,3.3.1,normal,normal,WordPress.org,defect (bug),new,,2012-01-06T17:13:07Z,2012-09-10T10:12:22Z,"Hey there, I exported a working copy of my online WordPress site to a local copy and noticed that the code gets changed; The backslash is removed which causes the json format to be invalide. Original code in the custom fields meta {{{ {""videos"":{""0"":""""}} }}} Becomes in the local site after import {{{ {""videos"":{""0"":""""}} }}} ",abdessamad idrissi Future Releases,8877,dotclear import don't set the post category,westi*,Import,,low,normal,WordPress.org,defect (bug),accepted,,2009-01-17T22:05:20Z,2012-05-24T22:32:57Z,"when importing from dotclear, all the posts are set only to the default category. i think the problem is due to the fact that wp_set_post_categories do nothing if we pass it only one category (don't know why...) ( in /wp-admin/import/dotclear.php, line 479 ) {{{ // Make Post-to-Category associations $cats = array(); $category1 = get_category_by_slug($post_cat_name); $category1 = $category1->term_id; }}} should be {{{ // Make Post-to-Category associations $cats = array(get_option('default_category')); $category1 = get_category_by_slug($post_cat_name); $category1 = $category1->term_id; }}} ",olivM Future Releases,4555,Better Typepad / MT Import - Atompub importer,lloydbudd,Import,2.3,normal,minor,WordPress.org,enhancement,new,,2007-06-28T03:16:12Z,2011-09-15T17:17:07Z,"Typepad in particular does some really funky things with permalinks. They often have no relation to anything in the title, and none of their ""slug"" information is contained in their standard export, so there is literally no way to redirect those links. It is possible to create a custom Typepad template that includes the needed information, and modify the WP importer to parse the extra info into slugs. Right now this is a hack, we should make this more intuitive.",matt Future Releases,12227,Tags are converted to categories upon importation of content from Blogger,,Import,2.9.1,normal,normal,WordPress.org,enhancement,new,,2010-02-14T18:24:13Z,2012-05-24T22:32:40Z,"When I imported posts from my old blog at Blogger/Blogspot, all the tags used for the Blogger posts were converted to categories in WP. ",dwstultz Future Releases,22837,"WP Needs to Set ""Sender"" and ""Reply-To"" or DKIM/DMARC will not work using wp-mail (via PHPMailer)",,Mail,3.4.2,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2012-12-09T17:23:48Z,2013-01-24T03:58:25Z,"I notice that for DKIM to function (while using DMARC) correctly for outgoing mail the PHPMailer object needs to make sure the Sender and Reply-To fields match the ""From"" field otherwise the ""Return-Path"" header uses the server it is sending from causing a mismatch. When this happens DKIM fails authentication on the receiver side because it is not added to outgoing mail. I tried adding the reply-to and sender header manually to wp_mail() but it did not work. One had to do the following: Right now i have to manually modify the /wp-includes/pluggable.php file in the wp_mail() function to include: {{{ if (strlen($phpmailer->Sender)==0) { $phpmailer->Sender = $phpmailer->From; $phpmailer->AddReplyTo($phpmailer->From); } }}} This resolves the problem and DKIM works again. ",kellogg9 Future Releases,15807,Featured image doesn't attach to post,,Media,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,dev-feedback,2010-12-14T11:57:23Z,2010-12-26T23:09:57Z,"When you use an image as featured, it doesn't attach to the post. Possibly related with #14390 (post image (thumbnail) in [gallery]) Tests: • If the image is already attached, it doesn't reattach ✔ • If the image is uploaded while writing the post, it attaches like another image, even if you are not using it in the post. ✔ • If an image is in the media library, not attached, and you use it in your post, it automatically attaches to the post. ✔ • If the image is in the media library, not attached, and you use it as featured image in a post, it doesn't attach ✘ ",bi0xid Future Releases,10752,Uploading new media to existing posts/pages backdates file location,,Media,2.8.4,normal,minor,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2009-09-08T20:35:20Z,2012-08-28T20:57:35Z,"Using WP 2.8.4, when uploading new media files to a page or post that has already been published, the new file is added in the /UPLOAD_DIR/year/month/ directory that corresponds to the original page/post publication date, rather than the file upload date. Also, the correct file-upload-date-based directory is created (if it does not already exist), but the file is still placed in the older incorrect directory. Example: Assume the following... On /wp-admin/options-misc.php: * ""Store uploads in this folder"" (referred to above as UPLOAD_DIR) is set to ""wp-content/uploads"" or any other location, such as ""files"" * ""Organize my uploads into month- and year-based folders"" is checked On an existing Page: * Page has a published date of 3/1/2008 * File a_test_file.jpg is uploaded on 9/1/2009 * UPLOAD_DIR is set to ""wp-content/uploads"", has 777 permissions, and contains no subdirectories or files WordPress 2.6.x and below would have created the following: * /wp-content/uploads/2009/09/a_test_file.jpg However, WP 2.8.4 is creating: * /wp-content/uploads/2008/03/a_test_file.jpg * /wp-content/uploads/2009/09 This issue was previously mentioned on the wordpress.org forums as being a known issue with WP 2.7.1: http://wordpress.org/support/topic/254786",dpie Future Releases,13568,Add filters to media uploader,,Media,3.0,low,minor,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-05-27T01:02:56Z,2011-12-30T13:12:12Z,"In wp-admin > includes > media.php: There should be a ""gallery_fields_to_edit"" filter similar to the ""attachment_fields_to_edit filter"", allowing gallery options to be filtered out. (Begins line #1749) Additionally, it should be possible to disable the ""Insert into Post"" button below each image (I believe it's line #1239 of the current build). I'm sorry, but my PHP knowledge is insufficient to write a working patch.",nudnik Future Releases,17247,Crop tool is automatically selected when editing an image,,Media,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-04-27T00:17:31Z,2011-04-27T09:34:31Z,"The crop tool is automatically selected when editing an image with the built-in tools. This can be confusing as the crop button is greyed out and inactive by default. To reproduce: 1. Create a new post or page 2. Upload an image 3. Click the Gallery tab 4. For the image you uploaded click ""Edit Image"" The crop tool will be automatically selected. If you drag the mouse over the image it will select an area to crop. A more intuitive behavior would be to have none of the editing tools selected by default. Currently, the next step is presumed when you click ""Edit Image."" It would be better to leave the next step up to each user so that clicking ""Edit Image"" didn't imply a default action.",andrewspittle Future Releases,11078,"Media Library tab in post editor should have ""Unattached"" and ""Trash"" filter options",,Media,2.9,normal,minor,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-11-05T04:16:04Z,2010-01-06T03:45:50Z,"The master Media Library admin page has options for viewing attachments based on their status, not just type—but the post editor media management only allows sorting based on type. Having at least the ability to filter for unattached media items would be useful when editing a post. Occasionally users could have older media that is not yet attached to a post and could get buried in the media pages by newer items.",markel Future Releases,13372,Separate Image sizes for different post types,,Media,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,close,2010-05-13T07:59:07Z,2013-01-03T16:14:23Z,"Would be nice, especially moving forward with custom post types to have the ability to set different image sizes using an additional parameter of `add_image_size()` for different post types: Page, Post, and Custom.",brandondove Future Releases,10950,Download external files to Media Library,,Media,,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2009-10-13T15:48:43Z,2011-08-04T19:11:02Z,"The media uploader currently allows you to upload a file from your local computer or link to an external URL. However, when linking to an external URL (in particular for an image), you don't get the same options as you would have when actually adding a resource to your site's media library. It would be nice to be able to fetch a file from an external source, and add it to the library, just as with a regular file upload. Then the file could be included in a gallery, you could use the image editor to crop/resize, etc. Primary use-case would be to fetch an external image into the library without having the extra steps of saving to your local computer, then re-uploading it to your WP site. However, it should work with any allowed content-type (audio, video, pdf, etc). It may also be useful to save the original URL as attachment metadata. ",dougal Future Releases,14884,Add a filter inside admin-ajax.php for walker,,Menus,3.0.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-09-16T14:01:31Z,2010-11-18T09:19:16Z,"I'm trying to extend the Wordpress menu system and i can't get the things working from start because inside admin-ajax.php on line 841, there is no filter. I'm talking about this piece of code {{{ if ( ! empty( $menu_items ) ) { $args = array( 'after' => '', 'before' => '', 'link_after' => '', 'link_before' => '', 'walker' => new Walker_Nav_Menu_Edit, ); echo walk_nav_menu_tree( $menu_items, 0, (object) $args ); } }}} The Walker_Nav_Menu_Edit class is applied by default. If someone can add a filter, it would be great for all developers.",dmad Future Releases,10597,More classes in menu generated using wp_list_pages and wp_page_menu,ryan,Menus,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-08-12T11:17:41Z,2010-03-01T20:46:38Z,"I think that dev team should think about adding more classes to positions generated by wp_list_pages and wp_page_menu as it's very hard to style those menus. I'm thinking about class ""parent"" for every li that contains another ul etc. We got current_page_ancestor and others but they only work if you're on the child ...",newkind Future Releases,14331,Tweaks to menu setup page,,Menus,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-07-16T21:30:45Z,2012-08-07T10:47:34Z,"It would be great if you could select a parent Page and ""Automatically add children"" to the menu. In a similar fashion, it would be great if the Menu could then automatically add any new children Pages created under that Parent.",mrmist Future Releases,17904,Multisite has more restrictions on user login character set,,Multisite,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2011-06-27T11:09:12Z,2013-02-12T20:54:04Z,"Multisite has more restrictions on the characters allowed in a user's login name compared to single site. This seems unnecessary and confusing. It was also the root of a recent bug in the importer, see [http://wordpress.org/support/topic/invalid-author-importing-single-wordpress-to-mulitsite-wordpress?replies=21#post-2186667 this forum thread] and the [http://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/401649 workaround]. I haven't worked up a patch yet since there seem to be a few locations where these restrictions are enforced and I don't know if I have found them all yet: - wpmu_validate_user_signup() uses the regex `/[a-z0-9]+/` - ms-default-filters.php adds `strtolower` to `sanitize_user` Relevant: http://mu.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/1689 [12948]",duck_ Future Releases,12832,Use the same data type for site statuses,database,Multisite,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-04-03T19:48:20Z,2012-01-31T17:50:59Z,"For status archived we use: {{{ archived enum('0','1') NOT NULL default '0', }}} Fo the others: {{{ public tinyint(2) NOT NULL default '1', mature tinyint(2) NOT NULL default '0', spam tinyint(2) NOT NULL default '0', deleted tinyint(2) NOT NULL default '0', }}} Shouldn't we use the same data type for the others? ",ocean90 Future Releases,13554,Wordpress MU canonical link redirect failure,markjaquith,Multisite,2.9.2,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-05-26T16:30:37Z,2010-11-13T08:02:46Z,"This problem manifests itself in Wordpress '''MU''' 2.9.2, but '''not''' in Wordpress 2.9.2. In the MU install where blogs are subdirectories, canonical redirects work correctly for the subdirectory blogs, but not for pages on the root blog. For example, [http://silverwarethief.com/essays/] is a sub-blog in the wordpress MU install. If you alter that link to [http://www.silverwarethief.com/essays/] wordpress MU will correctly redirect the browser to the canonical url. However, this does not work with pages on the root blog. [http://silverwarethief.com/about/] is a page on the root blog. If you go to that link, you will correctly find yourself at the ""About"" page. If you then alter the link to [http://www.silverwarethief.com/about/] you will be redirected to the main page of the root blog, not the ""About"" page. I have seen this behavior manifested on more than one MU install. ",rundi Future Releases,12030,Better Options for New Registrations,,Multisite,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-01-26T00:23:07Z,2012-04-18T17:13:58Z,"MU Trac Ticket: http://trac.mu.wordpress.org/ticket/872 At the moment when new users register, there are very few options and not many plugins available.. It would be nice if the administrator could : 1) Allow passwords to be set during registration, rather than having it sent by email. 2) Make Email Verification optional. 3) See the users who haven't confirmed their registrations, and resend the confirmation emails from the admin area.. 4) User Moderation : Make it easier to kick out users and delete spammers.. 5) Invitation Codes (Optional): Allow the admin to create invite codes, which he can distribute, so that the mu install is well knit social community. I know this is pretty much doable, but there lacks any good solution at the moment. ",wpmuguru Future Releases,14172,Implement $scheme in site info in ms-sites edit site,,Multisite,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-07-01T22:45:33Z,2010-07-03T19:17:45Z,"In WordPress 3.0 with Network enabled, if you were to click: Super Admin -> Sites -> Edit (next to any site) and then change any of the Site Options i.e. wp_2_options the changes don't save. We're running a secure environment and need Siteurl to be HTTPS instead of HTTP. Changing all the parameters to https and clicking Update doesn't save the changes.",firmdot Future Releases,18161,Bulk action: Add user to multiple sites,,Network Admin,3.2,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2011-07-18T19:07:04Z,2011-09-10T05:44:38Z,"Currently, to add a single user to multiple sites, the super admin has to edit each site, add the user to the site, and then go on to the next site. To improve this workflow, it would tremendously useful to be able to add a single user to multiple sites in the network admin. This ticket could have scaling problems to solve.",danielbachhuber Future Releases,8492,Page name drop-downs do not scale well,,Optimization,2.7,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2008-12-04T22:59:17Z,2009-11-23T21:30:53Z,"The page title drop-downs on options-reading and page.php seem to scale poorly in page loading times when you have a large number (around 1000) of Pages. I need to go to bed now so haven't researched this much, but I think the options-reading bit could be improved - I think it's currently fetching all of wp_posts when it only needs the title, which is a fair bit of wasted DB and processing time. rev 10051 and previous.",mrmist Future Releases,16894,Bulk load Comment Meta upon access,,Performance,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,dev-feedback,2011-03-19T11:19:27Z,2011-03-19T12:12:05Z,"When we query posts, we bulk load all of the posts meta and taxonomies at the time of request. Since adding comment meta, we load the comment meta on-the-fly since nothing really currently uses it in core. I've added a filter to ''get_comment_text'' which modifies the comment content based on the value of a meta key. The problem arises when multiple comments are displayed on a page, The metadata for every comment is loaded individually: {{{ SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (4) SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (5) SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (6) SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (7) SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (34) SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (35) SELECT comment_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_commentmeta WHERE comment_id IN (37) }}} in all cases, the function stack is: {{{ comments_template, wp_list_comments, Walker->paged_walk, Walker_Comment->display_element, Walker->display_element, call_user_func_array, Walker_Comment->start_el, call_user_func, twentyten_comment, comment_text, get_comment_text, apply_filters, call_user_func_array, MY_FUNCTION_HOOKED_TO_GET_COMMENT_TEXT, get_comment_meta, get_metadata, update_meta_cache #12 (0.7ms) }}} It isn't ideal that every comment causes an extra query, instead, we should bulk load comment meta for the comments being displayed. However, Since comment meta is not always used, in order to keep the load down, I'd suggest that we only bulk load the comment meta '''on the first request for comment meta''', this should allow current users to have no detrimental affect on query count/performance, whilst allowing those who use comment meta to manage each comment better performance.",dd32 Future Releases,22192,update_metadata() and update_option() strict checks can cause false negatives,,Performance,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,needs-unit-tests,2012-10-15T03:19:23Z,2012-10-15T10:22:31Z,"Given this: {{{ add_post_meta( $post_id, 'key', 1 ); update_post_meta( $post_id, 'key', 1 ); }}} The update should not work, because they are the same. However, the meta cache will have ""1"" as a string, and then it will strict compare it to 1 as an integer. Thus, an unnecessary update will run. Best I can tell, this could also affect update_option(). It is quite common to use integers and booleans directly into these functions. They should be smart enough to recognize that ""1"" == 1 == true and ""0"" == 0 == false, and that any numeric string is also equal to a properly cast integer. Unit tests needed. Ticket from which this was spun: #22189, saving navigation menus is slow.",nacin Future Releases,16343,"API for WP_Scripts: allow async loading, version checks",,Performance,,normal,minor,Future Release,enhancement,assigned,,2011-01-22T18:07:39Z,2011-01-25T15:48:01Z,"When developping a theme lately, I have found myself in the need of directly accesing the internals of the WP_Scripts class. I feel the funcionality I need might well help other developers. Use cases: 1.- Asynchronously load a (JS) script loaded by a/another plugin When loading a certain page, we needed to asynchronously load some (relatively heavy) scripts which are only seldom used. In order to keep page rendering fast, we only load them on demand, after the page frame has been rendered. In order to avoid having to bundle (potentially conflicting versions) scripts in every plugin and prevent duplicate loading, I suggest adding an API which would enable querying the source (as used by 'scripts-loader') 2.- Version checks for loaded scripts For high-performance sites, it might be useful to load a Google (or some other CDN) -provided jQuery et al ---which the user might already have cached--- instead of the bundled one, as long as it is the same version. Code example: $ver = $wp_scripts->version('jquery'); wp_unregister_script('jquery'); wp_register_script('jquery',""http://ajax.googleapis.com/jquery/$ver/jquery.min.js"",false,$ver); (needs discussion) I can provide the code (or the patch against Core) when the solution is decided (or soonish, if a proof-of-concept is needed) If WP 3.2 is going to finally be PHP 5.2+, I'd rather basically rewrite WP_Scripts (and/or WP_Dependencies). ",jltallon Future Releases,17246,Handling of HTTP 404 errors for non-existing files,,Performance,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-04-26T18:50:15Z,2011-05-12T04:19:27Z,"Generally if WordPress sees a request for a specific file it means the web server couldn't find that file. Currently we run all of WordPress in such cases and output the theme's 404 template. If the missing file is an image that has been reused 10 times (perhaps a CSS background or sprite) we will run ten extra times on every page load. What I'm proposing is to short-circuit all requests for specific files very early in the load cycle, the same way we do it for favicon.ico requests and output a generic 404 notice.",azaozz Future Releases,11585,WordPress should cache failed feed fetches so as to avoid overloading feed sources,,Performance,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-12-24T02:25:17Z,2010-03-01T16:41:13Z,"Following up on #11219, which fixed the cause of that particular error, but not the one that related to caching of feed errors. When SimplePie fails to fetch or parse a feed, it should not hammer whichever server the feed came from on every page load. This is bad for two reasons: it disturbs the originating server, and it tremendously slows down page loads when the feed is in an RSS widget on the front end. Instead, we should cache the error for a reasonably long amount of time (15 minutes? An hour? More?) and bypass SimplePie until that duration expires.",Denis-de-Bernardy Future Releases,8905,Category pagination broken with certain permalink structures,ryan,Permalinks,2.7,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2009-01-21T07:26:31Z,2013-01-03T21:37:18Z,"If one uses a permalink structure with %category% followed by %postname%, accessing pagination can cause a 404, as WordPress attempts to look for a post called ""page"". As per http://barefootdevelopment.blogspot.com/2007/11/fix-for-wordpress-paging-problem.html Presumably can occur with other permalink structures too.",rmccue Future Releases,5305,permalinks broken when article name is numeric,ryan,Permalinks,2.3.1,normal,major,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2007-11-01T21:27:54Z,2013-05-09T15:51:24Z,"if you create numeric-only post name, the generated slug is this number - this conflicts with article ID, so it returns different article or 404 page, never the article. It can be then solved by generating manual slug with some char in it, but i think it would be better to include some char in that case, e.g. underscore, like _123 Also if someone will try to solve this, it would be nice to solve other problem - if post slug is begining with the slug of the category, than the category page returns that post, not the category",thomask Future Releases,8515,Archive Permalink,ryan,Permalinks,,lowest,trivial,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-12-06T22:08:05Z,2009-06-13T18:39:14Z,"Currently in the permalink settings, you can set a category and a tag base. I propose that an archive base also be added. It would be useful in that you could disallow the archive base in robots.txt (much like many do with the tag and category base), but still allow robots to get the posts. Presently, doing this is a problem, as if you disallow /2008, for example, it will also disallow the robot to access the individual posts.",LuckyBambu Future Releases,9825,"Enforce permalink history, outright",,Permalinks,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,assigned,dev-feedback,2009-05-15T01:06:37Z,2011-02-16T12:02:57Z,"currently, we enforce old slugs and www pref (not even sure that works, since I ended up fixing it in a plugin). canonical doesn't work for pages, or hardly. we should enforce permalink history, outright. store it in a a db field, and query against it to optimize url2post().",Denis-de-Bernardy Future Releases,1914,Permalinks for unattached uploads/attachments,,Permalinks,1.6,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,reopened,,2005-11-19T09:21:26Z,2012-10-31T21:56:22Z,"Currently attachement links are in the form: {{{ http://www.example.com/?attachment_id=1 }}} Would look much neater if these matched the permalinks of regular posts (depending on what it is configured to) eg: {{{ http://www.example.com/attachement/1/ }}}",dlhau@… Future Releases,5130,Linking to multiple posts on your site breaks pingback due to comment flooding,,Pings/Trackbacks,2.3,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2007-10-01T17:36:13Z,2010-12-26T03:34:02Z,"http://scott.sherrillmix.com/blog/programmer/web/wp_pingpreserver/ is this useful in WP 2.3?",Denis-de-Bernardy Future Releases,12154,Updating a post modifies pingback timestamp,,Pings/Trackbacks,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-02-06T21:17:46Z,2010-06-14T00:29:42Z,"Steps to reproduce:[[BR]] Create blog post 1. Publish. [[BR]] Create blog post 2. From within the post body, link to blog post 1. Publish. A pingback comment is created for post 1, with the timestamp as for blog post 2.[[BR]] Edit blog post 2. Do not change publication timestamp. Save changes. Expected behaviour: Pingback is not affected.[[BR]] Actual behaviour: Pingback timestamp is changed - instead of the publication time of blog post 2, it is now set to the time when I edited blog post 2.",htoomik Future Releases,12582,user_registered action suggestion,westi,Plugins,2.9.2,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-03-11T11:10:48Z,2010-06-23T17:26:12Z,"I am developing theme that should include user login / registration (so we dont have to see wp-login.php ever again). Now for login it was easy - with the help wp_login_url user is redirected back to whatever page we need after login. To achieve same thing for registration i added new action in wp-login.php {{{ $errors = register_new_user($user_login, $user_email); do_action('user_registered', array($user_login, $user_email, $errors)); }}} using this action now i can make wp-login.php redirect user to main page and display errors there. Maybe this could be included in wordpress? Or maybe wp_login_url type function that can redirect user wherever needed? I would personally go with action as it gives much more freedom.",roxaz Future Releases,14769,"API for ""Settings"" action link on plugins.php",,Plugins,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2010-09-02T22:10:35Z,2010-12-07T23:12:33Z,"Plugins should be able to register a ""Settings"" actions link that will then take them to their plugin settings page. We should try to hook into add_options_page() as well, just by taking the first one that the plugin registers. Probably not really doable to ascertain which plugin calls that function however, without running a backtrace. Maybe try matching the slug with the plugin basename. Someone is encouraged to run with this before I get to it.",nacin Future Releases,15514,Category/Tag Converter should include Post Format conversions,,Plugins,,normal,normal,WordPress.org,feature request,new,,2010-11-20T03:13:53Z,2013-01-17T17:10:01Z,"The category/tag converter should include the ability to convert categories or tags to post formats. The converter in general needs a pretty serious UI or code cleanup, so if anyone wants to own this, that would be awesome, and I will assist.",nacin Future Releases,11418,Allow adding post thumb via url,,Post Thumbnails,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2009-12-13T11:05:05Z,2010-01-05T20:57:07Z,currently it is only possible to add post thumbs from blog's gallery,pascal.herbert Future Releases,15218,Publish box (inner-sidebar) hidden in custom posts without show_ui,,Post Types,3.0.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-10-26T08:18:19Z,2010-12-08T20:17:16Z,"I'm pretty sure this is a bug as I can't figure out a reason for the following: ---- Create a new custom post type with '''show_ui => true''' ''(which is supposed to hide the menus for it if false)''. Create a post, go to the post edit screen. Now edit the plugin code and '''switch true to false''' for '''show_ui'''. Hit refresh and the inner-sidebar is gone. ---- Is this expected behavior and, if it is?!?!... how should it be handled? Some people need to manage the custom posts by themselves and not have then show up in the menu, trash can,... but they need the editor, scheduling and such. Thanks a lot.",5ubliminal Future Releases,13509,Searching doesn't return Private results to logged in users with read_private_ permissions,ryan,Post Types,2.9.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-05-24T00:31:11Z,2010-11-13T08:01:18Z,"When you do a search with these requirements...[[BR]] - You are a registered user.[[BR]] - You are logged in.[[BR]] - You have '''''read_private_posts''''' permissions. ... you expect seeing in the results those Private posts that contains your query's terms. But you end up with showing only the ones that belongs to you. I think the bug is in these lines: {{{ if ( is_user_logged_in() ) { $where .= current_user_can( ""read_private_{$post_type_cap}s"" ) ? "" OR $wpdb->posts.post_status = 'private'"" : "" OR $wpdb->posts.post_author = $user_ID AND $wpdb->posts.post_status = 'private'""; } }}} As '''''$post_type_cap''''' is set to ""any"" when you do a search, the conditional expression always fails as it's asking for this: {{{ current_user_can( ""read_private_anys"" ) }}} ... and ends up always in the second part of the conditional expression. That is: {{{ "" OR $wpdb->posts.post_author = $user_ID AND $wpdb->posts.post_status = 'private'"" }}} Thanks.",inbytesinc Future Releases,14761,unregister_post_type(),,Post Types,2.9,lowest,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,dev-feedback,2010-09-02T12:00:17Z,2013-05-16T20:42:09Z,"Two use cases: 1. Remove a core post type. Means that the admin menus should respond in kind, though certain aspects of core like query/rewrite might not like this. Not the main use case regardless. 2. Removing a post type of another plugin, or potentially more likely, a parent theme. Example barebones function: http://wordpress.pastebin.com/VexHkgig Related, unregister_taxonomy() #11058 and unregister_taxonomy_for_object_type(): #14482",nacin Future Releases,7605,Press This: Edit URL,noel,Press This,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-08-26T20:35:04Z,2010-08-19T22:40:44Z,It'd be nice if the Press This bookmarklet had the same edit URL capabilities as the Wordpress administration.,awayken Future Releases,7604,Press This: Post auto-saving,noel,Press This,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-08-26T20:33:42Z,2010-08-19T22:41:12Z,It'd be nice if the Press This bookmarklet had the same autosave capabilities as the Wordpress administration.,awayken Future Releases,17027,Allow WP_Query to return just the count,,Query,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-04-02T18:32:56Z,2011-04-02T18:32:56Z,"Currently, you can't ask just for the total number of posts for a certain query. You have to execute that query and then retrieve the total using SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS. Maybe a {{{'fields' => 'count'}}} option would do it. Example where this is needed in Core: #17019",scribu Future Releases,9470,Allow get_pages to get child pages of multiple pages,,Query,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-04-06T10:51:02Z,2012-10-30T20:14:27Z,"I'm doig a lot of WordPress CMS work, and am finding it increasingly annoying that i can only get the children of one page through get_pages. It would be great if child_of could also, just like include and exclude, be a comma separated array of pages for which you want to fetch the children.",joostdevalk Future Releases,12719,"Custom taxonomy with query_var set, gets taxonomy query_var appended anyway",dd32*,Query,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,accepted,,2010-03-26T12:42:16Z,2010-10-28T08:24:18Z,"In my browser address field, appending my WP url with ""?customtax=termslug"", the real WP query string gets changed to ""?customtax=termslug&taxonomy=customtax&term=termslug"". This causes cases where I append two custom taxes in the URL to not work. E.g. ""?customtax1=termslug1&customtax2=termslug2"" would result in something like ""?customtax1=termslug1&taxonomy=customtax1&term=termslug1&customtax2=termslug2"" and not work. If i two sets of custom taxonomies and slugs manually through a query_posts it works, and is not modified by WP.",Silkjaer Future Releases,9978,Sticky Posts are not ordered correctly after selection,ryan,Query,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-05-29T23:14:06Z,2009-06-11T13:28:46Z,"In WP_Query, sticky posts are added/moved to the top of the posts array after everything else is selected and ordered according to the query parameters. Sticky posts are loaded as a list of post_IDs from the database, according to the order they were marked as sticky. Sticky posts that were not originally part of the returned posts are queried and added into the collection of sticky posts separately. None of the handling of sticky posts, or the handling of the entire post array after stickies are added, is date ordered by date/title/whatever was requested. Stickies need to be loaded/extracted into a separate array, ordered (independently) according to the original query, then added to the top of the post array.",beaulebens Future Releases,14477,get_pages with child_of only works with uninterrupted hierarchies,,Query,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-07-30T19:00:50Z,2010-11-23T01:36:16Z,"I have a page X with several children and grandchildren. Some of the grandchildren have a certain meta key and value. I now want to fetch all pages under page X that have this meta key. After reading the documentation of ''get_pages'', I expected this to work with a single call of ''get_pages''. But if I use get_pages like this: {{{ get_pages('child_of=X&meta_key=A&meta_value=B'); }}} it returns no pages at all (hierarchical=0 has no effect). It seems that's because ''child_of'' triggers a call of ''get_page_children'' which only returns uninterrupted hierarchies. Since the query returns only some grandchildren and no direct descendants, the function fails. IMHO, that's a bug. ",vividvisions Future Releases,11398,new sort method for query_posts (order by last comment date),ryan,Query,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-12-11T15:44:42Z,2010-06-14T00:30:40Z,"I think we need sorting by latest post comment ability for query_posts. ""Recent comments"" plugins does this but we need this sorting in the core. BBPress is planned as a WP plugin according latest chat logs posted by Matt. We gonna have to need this anyway.",erden.ozkan Future Releases,12769,Disappearing posts/pages (in quickedit mode),,Quick/Bulk Edit,2.9.2,low,minor,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-03-30T08:53:39Z,2011-03-13T22:53:58Z,"Steps to reproduce: 1. Quickedit a post. 2. Click save and instanly click quick-edit on another post. When the ajax-request completes the first quick-edited post will disappear from the posts table. This is only a display bug.",catahac Future Releases,11302,Bulk editing posts should pre-fill fields with the same value,,Quick/Bulk Edit,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-12-01T20:48:41Z,2012-07-13T04:08:11Z,"All I need is quickly move some posts from one category to another. How to simulate this problem: Create 2 posts in Uncategorized category. Check both of them - Bulk actions - Edit. There is no category selected even if both posts are in Uncategorized. When I check Category1 and click Update, both posts are now in Uncategorized and also in Category1. But no chance remove them from Uncategorized with Bulk actions.",pavelevap Future Releases,15637,Inline Edit Has No Hooks,,Quick/Bulk Edit,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-12-02T01:00:50Z,2012-05-11T11:23:26Z,"Currently, I am attempting to make it possible for an author to ""feature"" a post straight from the Quick Edit screen. I am looking in wp-includes/class-wp-posts-list-table.php and there are no hooks or actions for the Quick Edit screen so that I can add a checkbox or another input field in there. I just want to add a checkbox to ""feature"" the post and then save it to the custom fields of that post, not too hard. But I need the do_action's to be there! Thanks!",sean212 Future Releases,14326,Renaming tags/categories causes unpredictable results,,Quick/Bulk Edit,3.0,lowest,trivial,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-07-16T02:39:14Z,2010-11-22T17:35:14Z,"When renaming a tag/category through quick edit, if the new title contains the character ' — ' (&8220;) the script produces unexplainable results.",kdizas Future Releases,11472,Should QuickEdit remove posts from lists as needed?,,Quick/Bulk Edit,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-12-17T10:29:38Z,2013-01-21T23:51:08Z,"Create a draft post. Visit Posts / Edit, and quickedit the draft. Set its status to Published and save. It remains around, with the published status, instead of being removed from the list. Reporting this just in case, as it might be a UI feature rather than a bug. ",Denis-de-Bernardy Future Releases,12208,Add Quick Edit To Media Library,,Quick/Bulk Edit,,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2010-02-12T01:45:12Z,2013-04-12T16:28:27Z,"I am requesting that a quick edit link be added to the media in the media library like what is on the posts page. I would like to quickly be able to edit titles, alts, and captions at least.",queenofdiy Future Releases,13382,_wp_post_revision_fields filter is not very useful,,Revisions,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-05-13T20:57:51Z,2013-01-21T14:48:16Z,"The _wp_post_revision_fields filter allows plugins to modify which post fields get revisioned (the default is title, content, excerpt). It's pretty useless, though, since it's only run once and can't be changed by post_type. A custom post type, for example, might only want to enable revisions on the content. The _wp_post_revision_fields() is also a variation on the getter/setter pattern (static variable) we use in a few places to avoid globals. It makes the function kind of crazy. Proposal: Split into two functions {{{ @var int|object|array $post post_id or post object or post array @return array Fields to revision: array( field => i18n'd label ) function wp_get_post_revision_fields( $post ) { // filter with _wp_post_revision_fields: pass post_id, post_type, ...? // don't cache results } @internal @var array $past post array @return array Filled $post array with revision info function _wp_post_revision_fields( $post ) { $revisionable = wp_get_post_revision_fields( $post ) // ... } }}} I'd like to see this in 3.0 if we can, but marking as 3.1 for now.",mdawaffe Future Releases,16725,Inconsistent leading slash in WP_Rewrite,,Rewrite Rules,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-03-02T17:25:58Z,2011-03-02T17:25:58Z,"#16626 revealed an inconsistency in WP_Rewrite, where {{{$wp_rewrite->front}}} has a leading slash, but the final rules array doesn't. This is caused by the fact that {{{$wp_rewrite->permalink_structure}}} itself has a leading slash. Also note that {{{$wp_rewrite->search_structure}}} stands out as the only structure that doesn't have a leading slash. This should be made consistent somehow.",scribu Future Releases,12107,Author role overrides edit image title set by editor,,Role/Capability,2.8.6,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-02-01T01:56:49Z,2010-11-13T07:42:50Z,"If assigned as 'Author' as Role in Wordpress User Setting, Author cannot add or edit the 'Edit Image Title' field for any images (even though they upload themselves) Furthermore, if there is an existing text in 'Edit Image Title' field, and if Author 'Save Draft' or 'Update Post' (without doing any editing at all), the Image Title will be removed. In other words, only the Roles of 'Admin' and 'Editor' are able to add Image Titles to images. The Role of 'Author' cannot add image titles and not only that, by accessing and saving a post, any existing Image Titles added by Admin or Editor becomes removed. I tested on Wordpress version 2.8.6 and 2.9.1 I have previously posted a thread on the support forum here http://wordpress.org/support/topic/356199?replies=1#post-1365412",noyu Future Releases,12061,Treatment of shortcodes by wpautop is incomplete,,Shortcodes,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-01-28T02:27:18Z,2013-01-19T08:36:17Z,"There are a number of issues that arise when shortcodes are embedded in a block of content that is filtered by wpautop. After studying the issue, I have come to the conclusion that the underlying issue is that a shortcode can result in a block-level HTML element or an inline snippet of HTML. Neither wpautop nor shortcode_unautop have the information necessary to know what the intended to be block-level or text-level, which results in
tags to appear in places where they were not intended and causes invalid markup when paragraphs are not closed properly. 1) shorcodes when registered need to state the display type of the html that they return (inline or block). In addition, the javascript version of filters need to be provided with the same data. 2) An alternate mechanism for handling shortcodes prior to wpautop needs to be implemented. To maintain a separation between wpautop and shortcodes, temporarily replacing block-level shortcodes with unique tokens, running wpautop, running wpautop on the content of the shortcode (since this is a separate filter, plugins can disable it on a per shortcode basis), and then replacing the token with shortcodes post-wpautop. As WP and plugin authors use shortcodes more and more, I think this is an issue that should not be left to the wayside. Shortcodes especially tied to tinymce buttons make working with WordPress easier for the average content producer. ",gcorne Future Releases,18776,balanceTags should ignore shortcodes & their content,,Shortcodes,3.2.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2011-09-26T11:26:10Z,2012-04-27T19:44:20Z,"Take following input: {{{ something [myshortcode][/myshortcode] }}} after `balanceTags()` it becomes: {{{ something [myshortcode][/myshortcode] }}} Well, this is not what the shortcode creator probably wanted. '''Proposed fixes:''' If you are feeling lazy: Convert `[.*]` to `<$1>` and since balanceTags handles XML it should work, afterwards convert appropriate `<>` back to `[]`. Though this does not give a shortcode creator chance to disallow balancing tags inside it's content which is bad. Better fix is to allow shortcode creators to decide wether their contents should be balanced: 1. `balanceTags()` should ignore all shortcodes and their contents. 2. Parse all shortcodes in content and on each shortcode call apply filter on so that shortcode creator can hook (if sees it appropriate) on to that. Shortcode creator then can call `balanceTags()` in his filter of that shortcode in order to run `balanceTags()` ''contents of shortcode'' separately if wanted.",ciantic Future Releases,13606,Comma's in taxonomy term names make them unpickable,,Taxonomy,,normal,major,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-05-28T21:10:02Z,2010-11-13T03:19:01Z,"In the taxonomy term adder/editor, you are allowed to put comma's in their names, but the JS picker thinks they are two separate terms separated by a comma. Two possible obvious solutions: 1.) Disallow terms from having commas in the names 2.) Fix the JS",johnjamesjacoby Future Releases,11156,Duplicate tag created if tag name contains ampersand,filosofo,Taxonomy,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2009-11-16T21:51:37Z,2010-11-13T07:25:30Z,"This is undoubtedly an edge case, but here's what happened: 1. I created a tag with a long name that contained an ampersand. Gave it a shorter slug than the one WP generated. 2. Tagged some posts. 3. While the server was running slow, the autocomplete never came up, and I tagged another post by cutting and pasting the tag name from another screen. That resulted in a new tag being created with a longer WP-generated slug, instead of the post getting tagged with my older existing tag. This happened a few times (the server in question is REALLY slow), and I finally realized that the only tags that were incorrectly duplicated were the ones with ampersands.",sillybean Future Releases,14093,"Malformed category hidden from edit-tags, but shows in meta box",,Taxonomy,,low,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-06-25T19:11:49Z,2011-01-13T08:07:15Z,"Came from a report in IRC by xomp. In the following example, category 1's parent is category 2, and vice versa. {{{ mysql> select term_taxonomy_id, term_id, taxonomy, parent from wp_term_taxonomy; +------------------+---------+---------------+--------+ | term_taxonomy_id | term_id | taxonomy | parent | +------------------+---------+---------------+--------+ | 1 | 1 | category | 2 | | 2 | 2 | category | 1 | | 3 | 3 | category | 0 | | 4 | 4 | category | 1 | +------------------+---------+---------------+--------+ 4 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select term_id, name from wp_terms; +---------+-----------------+ | term_id | name | +---------+-----------------+ | 1 | Category 1 | | 2 | Category 2 | | 3 | Category 3 | | 4 | Category 4 | +---------+-----------------+ 4 rows in set (0.00 sec) }}} On edit-tags, you'll see only Category 3. In the hierarchical meta box, you'll see: {{{ Category 3 Category 1 - Category 2 - Category 4 }}} If we decide to show corrupted data, we should be consistent. At the very least, edit-tags should reveal more than the meta box, not the other way around.",nacin Future Releases,5358,Queried object on multiple tag query holds only first tag,ryan,Taxonomy,2.3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2007-11-15T05:17:21Z,2013-01-28T14:01:36Z,"On tag page results when two or more tags are queried ('''/tags/foo,bar''' -or- '''/tags/foo+bar'''), only the first tag is in the queried object. So a simple: {{{ print_r($wp_query->get_queried_object()); }}} outputs a single associative array of the first tag referenced in the query. One would expect to find an array of all tags in the queried object.",Kafkaesqui Future Releases,14399,get_term_children doesn't call clean_term_cache() if necessary,,Taxonomy,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2010-07-23T13:32:11Z,2011-01-15T02:01:34Z,"1. Create a taxonomy on something 'non standard'[[BR]] 2. Create a (parent) term.[[BR]] 3. Create a child term. [[BR]] 4. Retrieve child terms of the parent term using, amongst others, get_term_children(). Roughly: {{{ register_taxonomy( 'where-you-live', 'user', array('hierarchical' => true, 'show_ui' => true, 'query_var' => true, 'label' => __('Where they live')) ); $country = 'USA'; $state = 'New York'; $tax_country = wp_insert_term($country, 'where-you-live'); $country_term_id = $tax_country['term_id']; wp_insert_term($state, 'where-you-live', array('parent'=>$country_term_id)); $state_terms = get_child_terms($country_term_id, 'where-you-live'); error_log(print_r($state_terms,1)); }}} I am expecting an array containing the 'New York' child term, but I get nothing.[[BR]] Have also tried get_terms() with child_of or parent args, which also fail (presumably for the same reason?).",miradev Future Releases,13949,Add a sprintf style argument to wp_list_categories() for title tag.,,Taxonomy,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-06-17T18:01:20Z,2010-10-28T02:10:59Z,"By default, wp_list_categories() will use the value of $term->description for the title tag of every link that it generates. If the argument ""use_desc_for_title"" is set to false, it will produce a string like: ""View all posts filed under $term->name"". With the inclusion of custom post_types into core, it would be wonderful to have more control over this title. The best solution that I can think of is to add a sprintf style argument which will allow themes and plugins to provide a custom format. Something like: 'title_format' => 'View all tacos posted under %s.' ",mfields Future Releases,22023,Remove UNIQUE for slug in wp_terms,,Taxonomy,2.3,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2012-09-27T20:23:10Z,2013-05-14T13:38:13Z,"To set us up for future changes to the taxonomy API, we should remove the UNIQUE key for 'slug' for wp_terms. Said future changes include: * Splitting shared terms on update (#5809) * Stop creating shared terms (#21950) * Forcibly split remaining shared terms * Merge wp_terms and wp_term_taxonomy (I can dream, right?) The term_exists() check should prevent duplicate terms from ever being inserted (before, of course, we fix #5809 and #21950). But, this needs unit tests, particularly because there is a case where term_exists() breaks. See #17689, which blocks this ticket.",nacin Future Releases,11576,The future of the 'uncategorized' category,,Taxonomy,2.9,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,assigned,,2009-12-23T14:32:42Z,2011-04-15T08:44:01Z,"Is there any plan for removing the 'Uncategorized' category, or at least removing its requirement? Some users want the ability to only show the_category() when the post is part of a real category. Also, with the introduction of custom taxonomies in 2.9, not all hierarchical taxonomies will have a default term, so this flexibility needs to be introduced anyway. I'm curious why the default category was introduced in the first place? Was it solely for permalink handling? If attachment:ticket:10122:hierarchical_metaboxes-2.patch is accepted (specifically handling hierarchical taxonomies as int) the following just needs to be added above the checkbox list to allow deselecting of all terms from the taxonomy: {{{ ]"" value="""" /> }}} ",prettyboymp Future Releases,7740,Merge Tags,,Taxonomy,2.7,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,dev-feedback,2008-09-14T16:56:07Z,2011-10-18T23:46:10Z,"As mentioned in [http://wordpress.org/support/topic/163558 a support thread], tags can get cluttered over time with many different tags meaning basically the same thing. To clean up tagging the ability to merge tags would be a life saver. The functionality I had in mind was being able to select two or more tags in edit-tags.php and select 'Merge' from the 'Actions' dropdown. When you click 'Apply' a lightbox would open with the following: '''What should become the primary tag?'''[[BR]] [Textfield][[BR]] ''The name is how the tag appears on your site.'' '''What should become the primary tag slug?'''[[BR]] [Textfield][[BR]] ''The “slug” is the URL-friendly version of the name. It is usually all lowercase and contains only letters, numbers, and hyphens.'' '''Which slugs should continue to point to the new primary tag?'''[[BR]] [Textarea automatically filled with the old slugs][[BR]] ''One slug per line.'' '''Save''' | '''Cancel''' The last textarea allows old slugs to still point to the new primary tag - meaning any old URL's will still work. === -~- Example -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ === I've got the following tags which all mean the same thing: TV, the box, telly I select them all in edit-tags.php, select 'Merge' and 'Apply'. In the popup box I choose 'television' as the primary tag, 'television' as the slug, and list the old tags in the textarea. I now have a tag called 'television' which has ""television, TV, the box, telly"" all pointing to it, so my old URL's still work. All of my posts which use the old tags have now magically swapped to using 'television'.",hempsworth Future Releases,16929,pass the $type_of_url context param on user_trailingslashit() for CPT's,,Template,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2011-03-22T08:42:09Z,2011-03-22T09:55:02Z,"Currently get_post_permalink() does not pass the context flag to user_trailingslashit(), this means that for custom post types, it's not possible to target them through the 'user_trailingslashit' filter. It might be worth checking to see if taxonomies and any other uses of user_trailingslashit() pass the context as well.",dd32 Future Releases,4575,Add functions to return the last-modified timestamp of a category/tag,,Template,2.2.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2007-07-02T12:36:26Z,2009-08-07T18:46:45Z,"Hi, All categories Last-Modified dates are the same, and thats a one big rss file i guess. Is there a chance to send individual Last-Modified dates to these feed ? Thanks",delusions Future Releases,15516,Candidates for new template functions based on code in Twenty Ten,,Template,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-11-20T06:30:13Z,2010-11-20T07:11:25Z,There are several pieces of code in Twenty Ten which are candidates for abstraction into template functions. I'll make a list shortly and put it up here to get feedback.,johnbillion Future Releases,14113,Function that could improve the current edit_post_link(),,Template,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-06-27T15:20:42Z,2010-10-28T05:37:38Z,"Basicly this function is the same than [http://core.trac.wordpress.org/browser/trunk/wp-includes/link-template.php#L820 edit_post_link()] but some little differences which can make it more useful for developers. So far it has two advantages: '''1)''' The edit link can be easily returned. '''2)''' It's possible to choose a class for link tags. {{{ // Returned function wp_get_edit_link($args = '') { $defaults = array( 'link' => null, 'before' => '', 'after' => '', 'id' => 0, 'class' => 'post-edit-link' ); $r = wp_parse_args($args, $predet); extract($r); if ( !$post = &get_post($id) ) return; if ( !$url = get_edit_post_link($post->ID) ) return; if (null === $link) $link = __('Edit This'); $post_type_obj = get_post_type_object($post->post_type); $link = 'labels->edit_item ) . '"">' . $link . ''; return $before . apply_filters('get_edit_link' , $link , $post->ID) . $after; } // Echoed function wp_edit_link($args = '') { echo wp_get_edit_link($args); } }}} '''Example using the function:''' Returning: {{{ &after=&class=my-link-class&link=Edit me!'); echo $var; ?> }}} Echoing: {{{ &after=&class=my-link-class&link=Edit me!'); ?> }}} Results on: {{{ Edit me! }}}",metacortex Future Releases,9666,Pass object id in the various formatting filters,,Template,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-04-28T10:31:44Z,2012-10-30T20:50:38Z,"This is a consolidated ticket, in reference to #9319 and #5746. Both were requests to pass either of $post or $post->ID as an argument to the_title (both have patches for that). The same idea could be applied to multitudes of other formatting hooks. They're not always called in the loop, so determining the ID of the object (post, link, category, tag, etc.) isn't always easy in the event that it is useful. Suggested enhancement: each filter such as the_title, the_content, etc., but also the_permalink, the_category_link, etc., possibly also the_category, etc., as well... basically any hook that is formatting related and that affects an individual object rather than a collection, should have the object's ID as an argument for easy reference.",Denis-de-Bernardy Future Releases,16268,Requirement for has_header_image() function?,,Template,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-01-17T12:05:24Z,2011-01-18T11:10:19Z,"I know is pretty easy to do, but would it be a good idea to provide a has_header_image() function for use in themes? Something along the lines of: {{{ function has_header_image() { $header_image = get_header_image(); return !empty( $header_image ); } }}} As the header_image() function just outputs the URL it would be handy to have a conditional function you could use to check when there was a header image to output. I'm currently working on a plugin that gives you more granular control over using different header images on different pages using the 'theme_mod_header_image' filter. There may be instances when you do not want to show a header at all on some pages. In the current TwentyTen theme for example, no checking is done before the header_image() function is called so in this scenario the header image just appears as a broken image - ideally it should not output the image at all. Either that or should there be a function which outputs the whole image tag so that if the header_image() function returns false/empty it does not output the tag at all? What are people's thoughts on this?",husobj Future Releases,9719,Please : a filter for $category object in get_the_category_list(),,Template,2.8,normal,minor,Future Release,feature request,reopened,,2009-05-04T09:09:10Z,2009-06-13T02:57:15Z,"To offer for one post more flexibility in how to display the names of categories in the_category() or in get_the_category_list() -file category-template line 166 - , is it possible to add a filter as the filter existing in wp_list_categories() . Useful to replace cat name by instance by image ''(iphone compatible theme)'' or to add translation in bilingual or multilingual theme ''(by instance with xili-language plugin)'' without re-creating specific function. As in classes.php (line 1328), I suggest this modif with a filter named post_list_cats for the start of two loops present in get_the_category_list() (line 187 et 209) {{{ foreach ( $categories as $category ) { $cat_name = attr( $category->name); $cat_name = apply_filters( 'post_list_cats', $cat_name, $category ); }}} and inside the two loops, $category->cat_name replaced by $cat_name with this filter it will be more coherent to treate cat list in one post or in sidebar for all posts Many thanks ",michelwppi Future Releases,9818,add a wp_notification functionality to output notices and errors on the front end,,Template,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,feature request,assigned,,2009-05-14T09:28:25Z,2010-07-06T22:43:20Z,"On occasion, a plugin needs to return some kind of feedback. It would be nice if a standard hook existed for this. It could go something like this: add_filter(wp_notification, foobar) foobar() appends to an array of notification messages that get displayed to the user on the front end. then, on page load: - in wp_head if notifications is not empty, we add a style, wp_notification, that makes elements of this class invisible, and we load jQuery - if do_action(wp_notification) is explicitly called on the page, we display the messages in there, without the class, and disable the notification on the wp_footer hook - an action gets fired on wp_footer if do_action(wp_notification) is not called, and we use ajax to place the needed messages in a absolutely positioned div element, with a close button. we could also add some kind of do_action(wp_commentform_notification), nearby the comments form, to output comment-related errors in their ""correct"" location as well.",Denis-de-Bernardy Future Releases,17739,Comment prompt text is misleading,,Text Changes,3.2,lowest,trivial,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-06-10T01:24:54Z,2012-11-19T16:46:04Z,"The comment form says, ""Your email address will not be published."" It can be deceptive b/c people assume it's used for some sort of verification, not that it goes to the site owner/comment moderator, who could very well decide to publish it if he/she happens to be an unethical jerk. People complain about this in support forums and elsewhere every now and then. Quite trivial issue compared to most tickets, but would be nice to take care of it. Suggestions for better text welcome.",jane Future Releases,9774,Warning: Division by zero in /wp-admin/custom-header.php on line 361 (and many more),,Themes,2.8,lowest,minor,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2009-05-09T18:54:43Z,2011-03-20T17:59:00Z,we might want to check if the needed defines are around and > 0 before allowing the custom-header.php to work.,Denis-de-Bernardy Future Releases,14824,WordPress is not updating Theme option after making a theme a child theme by adding the line 'Template' to the child`s css without refreshing Theem activation,,Themes,3.1,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-09-09T23:27:35Z,2011-01-13T08:51:36Z,"Situation: If you have 2 Themes on a 2 sites MultiSite install (each site is using one theme) and want to make one of them a child Theme of the other, you will go to one of them and add the line 'Template: NAME OF THE PARENT THEME' and save it. After doing so the Child Theme will not inherit any Template Files from the parent until you deactivate/activate the Child Theme again. Although it says in the ""Themes/Appereance"" section of the Child Themes backend 'CHILD THEME NAME uses templates from PARENT THEME NAME. Changes made to the templates will affect both themes.' even before deactivating/activating the Child Theme. Looks like the template page might be checking the style.css and not update the option.",drale2k Future Releases,19124,Add prompt on themes.php at end of available themes list,,Themes,3.3,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2011-11-03T02:43:49Z,2012-11-01T06:45:01Z,"For new users, getting a new theme is still overwhelming. Long-term we should overhaul the way the theme management area works, but short term we could add a blurb after the last available theme is listed to prompt user to search/browse for more themes to install.",jane Future Releases,14932,Featured Images: No way to custom crop when used as headers,,Themes,3.0.1,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-09-22T09:59:34Z,2010-09-22T14:27:21Z,"Custom Headers have Custom Cropping When a theme uses featured images for per-post headers you don't get that goodness. Makes feature images more ghetto for custom headers than they should be.",westi Future Releases,14341,Adjacent image disappears when a caption is added,,TinyMCE,,normal,major,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-07-17T23:53:02Z,2011-05-20T21:44:17Z,"If you place two images side by side inside a strong tag and then try to add a caption to one of the images, the other image disappears. Tested in r15436. To reproduce: [[BR]] 1) Open a new or existing post for editing [[BR]] 2) Place the sample code from below into the html editor [[BR]] 3) Switch to the visual editor and try to add a caption [[BR]] ---> You'll see the other image disappear Here is a screencast example: http://screencast.com/t/OTNmNjQzN Here is some sample code: {{{}}}",designsimply Future Releases,11674,Caption Short Codes Don't Work,,TinyMCE,,normal,critical,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2009-12-30T19:07:55Z,2010-08-02T05:44:42Z,"I'm testing 2.9.1-RC1 now. If I create a post, add a gallery plus a captioned image beneath it, this is what shows up in the HTML editing view: {{{
[gallery]}}}",miqrogroove Future Releases,6331,TinyMCE should have a code button,,TinyMCE,2.5,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,assigned,,2008-03-21T10:52:42Z,2009-10-25T11:23:00Z,"The html editor has a code button on the quicktags bar but TinyMCE doesn't. This is the only missing feature from TinyMCE that makes me switch to the HTML view when writing my weekly digest posts.",westi Future Releases,10596,Error when uploading zip package with parent and child themes,,Upgrade/Install,2.8.3,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),assigned,,2009-08-12T11:12:29Z,2012-01-06T12:30:14Z,"There's an error when you try to install a package containing parent and couple of child themes using zip package upload from the admin dashboard. For example i got a 1 big directory called test_template which contains 1 folder test_parent and 3 folders test_child1, test_child2, test_child3. If i upload test_template directory using ftp everything's ok, but when i try to use theme uploader and zip package test_template.zip i get an error caused by not finding a style.css file inside of the test_template directory ... but when i add a style.css file to that directory installation goes fine but templates aren't working till i use ftp and delete that file from that directory. It's troublesome if someone is giving his templates to other users.",newkind Future Releases,12031,Install do not check the magic_quote_sybase status,dd32,Upgrade/Install,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2010-01-26T00:27:25Z,2012-11-01T20:09:16Z,"MU Trac Ticket: http://trac.mu.wordpress.org/ticket/981 Just try to install on a server that it's magic_quote_sybase is on (okay for Oracle, but fatal for mysql) . It failed to update the wp-config.php and didn't set correctly the .htaccess. ",wpmuguru Future Releases,15440,PCLZIP_ERR_BAD_FORMAT (-10) : Invalid archive structure during plugin update,,Upgrade/Install,3.0.1,low,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-11-16T15:53:13Z,2011-04-03T13:15:03Z,"Currently, as part of our JW Player plugin we include several player skins so that users can customize the look of the JW Player. These skins are packaged as zip archives. For a while now we've been getting reports from our users having difficulty performing the automated update/install. These users are receiving a PCLZIP error which claims the plugin archive is invalid. From looking at the source code I see that WordPress first attempts to use the ZipArchive PHP module to unzip plugin packages. This always works for users updating our plugin. If this is not available it then uses a fallback library called PCLZIP. After some experimentation, it seems that PCLZIP has difficulty unzipping archives that contain archives. Is this a known issue from your experience? If so, is there a workaround other than removing the zip skins from our plugin package?",LongTail Video Future Releases,13071,Update bubble appears only at the second load,dd32,Upgrade/Install,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-04-21T15:51:25Z,2011-04-03T10:54:48Z,"Change the version of a plugin and go directly to ''wp-admin/update-core.php'' page.[[BR]] You will see the plugin update in the list but the bubbles on the menu appears only after a reload. ",ocean90 Future Releases,12671,Installer page doesn't check if MySQL tables were created successfully,,Upgrade/Install,2.9.2,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,assigned,,2010-03-22T17:47:33Z,2012-07-02T16:54:02Z,"When running the web-based setup script - My Mysql user didn't have create permissions so no tables were created but the message (underneath all the MySQL errors) said setup was successful. I think it would be worth doing a check for no MySQL errors before proclaiming the installation a success.",thedotproduct Future Releases,14393,Maintenance mode overkill. Please refine usage of it,,Upgrade/Install,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-07-22T22:12:14Z,2010-11-23T21:16:35Z,"Though many tickets have been posted about the Maintenance Mode not resolving, I think that the problem is on a different level. It is unacceptable that even a failed upgrade of an inactive theme can break a complete Site or even Network. Case in point: I just followed the upgrade alert for an inactive theme, hosted on the WordPRess theme repository. (Apparently it had an error (Incompatible Archive. PCLZIP_ERR_BAD_FORMAT (-10) : Unable to find End of Central Dir Record signature.) But the point is, this should not have put the entire network in maintenance mode for 10 minutes. Maybe a check can be done for plugins, themes etc: if they are active, then maintenance mode can be used (though I am definitely not a fan of it anyway).",bike Future Releases,9679,Move Plugin/Theme deletion to new WP_Upgrader class,DD32,Upgrade/Install,2.8,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2009-04-29T08:51:55Z,2009-05-10T21:16:43Z,"Expansion off #7875, The plugin/Theme deletions should be also handled by the Upgrader class.",DD32 Future Releases,15738,Automate Security Releases,,Upgrade/Install,,normal,trivial,Future Release,feature request,new,dev-feedback,2010-12-08T21:11:49Z,2012-12-03T23:27:46Z,"When security releases are published, several less tech-savvy users might neglect to update in fear of breaking their site. In reality, security/maintenance releases don't change the core API and shouldn't break anything*. We should have an option (disabled by default) that allows these X.X.1-style security updates to happen in the background. This will keep sites updated and secure and (hopefully) prevent the inevitable ""I wanted to wait to install 3.0.2 and someone hacked my site while I was waiting"" support requests. The option should be disabled by default, but when users are on the update screen they should see an option to ""install security releases automatically."" Major releases should always require an explicit action from the user to update the site as they can break themes and plug-ins and could potentially update database schema. * Except in the rare occasion where a developer hacks core.",ericmann Future Releases,8754,Uploading images whose dimensions are greater than the maximum size allowed fail to generate thumbnails and no error/failure message is displayed.,,Upload,2.7,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),reopened,,2008-12-30T02:50:09Z,2011-08-05T08:31:26Z,"The process of uploading images that have dimensions (physical size) greater than the maximum size allowed by the global setting will fail part way through the process without an error or failure message being displayed. Example: Uploading a JPEG image with a width of 625 pixels and height of 938 pixels. This physical size is greater than the maximum size allowed by the default WordPress configuration. When uploading such an image using the ""Add an Image"" panel the the Flash uploader will stop with the upload progress bar at 100% and displaying ""Crunching…"". The Browser uploader will return a blank ""Add an Image"" panel display. In both cases the images are uploaded to the appropriate directory on the server and appear when the post's media gallery is refreshed. Thumbnail images are not generated for these uploads. It appears the failure is before or during thumbnail generation. Note: The maximum image dimension allowed for upload is not the same as the Administration > Setting > Media > Large Size: Max Width and Max Height settings. In my case these settings are both set at 1024 pixels (above the size of the image I am working with). It appears this control panel setting only impacts the HTML image tag attributes for posts, so as not to break the visual design with images that are wider than a layout allows. Now you may ask what is the default maximum dimension for uploaded images. Unfortunately I cannot find my notes on where exactly the setting is in the WordPress code (it has no Web GUI access that I am aware of). I had changed this setting once to work around this problem and hoped 2.7 would have fixed the issue. It is a pain to track down as the location of this setting has changed over time as it moved to different files and functions with each new version of WordPress. My understanding is that this maximum image dimension setting was set to prevent images over 3 megapixels from being uploaded since those are really big and readers shouldn't have to deal with such images. This is old thinking from before broadband and photo blogs took off. See: http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/03/28/wordpress-thumbnail-size-limit-hack/ I think the default limit should be raised, but that would be a feature request. This ticket is to have error messages displayed. ",DRGDC Future Releases,14459,Rotate Full Size Images on Upload,azaozz,Upload,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,reviewing,,2010-07-29T23:16:17Z,2013-01-06T08:52:07Z,"It may be worth a revisit to #7042. Some mobile devices that use WordPress for Android are not capturing images in the correct orientation, instead they are writing the EXIF orientation to the image instead (which is a standard method these days). In wp-android and other external clients that offer full size image upload, these images will not be rotated correctly upon upload. Since most mobile users are on the go with no access to the wp-admin area to rotate the images themselves, it would work best if the image was rotated for them automatically. Hopefully there's a solution that wouldn't strip the EXIF data, some way to copy the EXIF data before rotating, then save it back again?",mrroundhill Future Releases,8234,Users with upload_files capability should be able to edit and delete uploaded files without having the edit_post/delete_post capability,,Upload,2.7,low,minor,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-11-15T22:17:14Z,2009-11-20T20:31:07Z,Users with upload_files capability are able to upload files but can't edit/delete his/her own uploaded files without having the edit_post/delete_post capability. Users capable to upload files should also be capable to edit/delete their own uploaded files.,olethomas Future Releases,7491,thumbnail creation fails silently,,Upload,,normal,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2008-08-09T19:16:19Z,2010-03-06T16:13:08Z,"When thumbnail creation fails, it fails silently, with no indication why it fails. That is a real pain in the ass if you're trying to debug. Frankly, I assumed for months that thumbnailing just wasn't implemented yet- it was only because I noticed that it does work on ma.tt that I even went back and tried to debug the situation. I'm still not succeeding in actually getting the thumbnailing working, for what it is worth- extensive googling suggested I should install libgd, which I've now done, but no helpful errors from wordpress means I'm just back at square one in terms of figuring out why it is breaking. There are no other directly pertinent bugs, but #7039 and #1952 mention instances of silent failure being a problem and #2794 has a (now bitrotted) patch creating an error reporting system. ",tieguy Future Releases,7580,Use Exif description to autofill the caption,,Upload,2.6,high,normal,Future Release,feature request,new,,2008-08-23T06:26:39Z,2011-11-19T19:58:35Z,"Hello, I test a lot of softwares to create a Exif description for my pictures. Like ""Exif Farm"" or other kind of this softwares. But When I Upload this picure in wp 2.6 the description will not show! but i have some picture from the web, and when i upload them, wordpress show the description of it automatically in description Box! like this picture: http://www.hinhxinh.com/data/media/8/Beijing_Olympic_2008_-___075.jpg and show description on it correctly: http://i33.tinypic.com/2yyqk1t.jpg Please tell me: the problem is from Wp, Or My software is not original? '''So What should i do to show Description Exif Data in wp Correctly?'''",mrmax Future Releases,12720,Delete user and hook confusion when deleting users in Multisite,,Users,3.0,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-03-26T12:42:59Z,2010-06-23T17:24:58Z,"Currently: The hook ''wpmu_delete_user'' fires when deleting user in Super Admin->Users. The hook ''remove_user_from_blog'' when deleting user under site Users->Authors & Users. In standard WP: The hook ''delete_user'' is called when deleting users it should be the same in MultiSite when deleting from Super Admin->Users. Or add new hooks and deprecate previous. ''delete_user_from_network'' for when deleting a user totally. ''delete_user_from_site'' for when deleting a user from a specific site. This is hook also then fires in non-MultiSite mode since that then corresponds to one site.",andreasnrb Future Releases,13569,Odd edge case with shared user tables and custom admin username during install,,Users,,lowest,trivial,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-05-27T06:06:43Z,2010-11-13T08:04:31Z,"1. In install 1, run install.php and use a custom username (NOT called 'admin') and set the e-mail to email@example.com. 2. In install 2, before installing, set up shared user tables with install 1. Then run the installer. You won't have the ability to choose usernames (that's expected). Use the *same* email. 3. Click ""Install."" You'll get hit with a WP_Error object. What's happening? The logic in wp_install() is to do a username_exists() against the username passed to it. If the user exists, it assumes that you're using shared user tables. Problem is, wp_install() is passed 'admin' from install.php (as that's the default, and you don't see the fields when custom user tables are setup), while your user is not called 'admin'. The e-mail address is already being used for another user however, so it is creating 'admin' and is failing on the duplicate e-mail address. If the email address doesn't match any user, I imagine you'd instead get an 'admin' user in your second install, which you could promptly delete. I see no problem with that, as the alternatives are to pick which user should become an admin. So, the fix would be to change username_exists() and the logic that follows, and instead match the e-mail address with an existing user, and make that user the new administrator. If no user with that email exists, we create an admin user and they can tough it out. I do not feel this is a blocker at all. The symptoms I am seeing should be the same in 2.9.2 if you removed the admin user in install 1, then proceeded to share user tables with install 2 before installing. It'd be nice to at least prevent the fatal error and allow the install to finish, however. I do want to get to it in 3.0 if I can, since we now are allowing custom admin names. That said, setting to 3.1.",nacin Future Releases,11959,Value Truncation Still Unchecked in registration.php,,Users,,normal,normal,Future Release,defect (bug),new,,2010-01-20T22:59:50Z,2010-11-13T07:38:28Z,"Functions such as username_exists() fail to perform sanity checks against the storage schema. As a result, it is possible to register multiple users with the same username, if the length is greater than or equal to the username field size. Only the first user can login, however anyone re-registering that username can impersonate the first user to reset their password.",miqrogroove Future Releases,12393,Hooks to enable custom login without editing core files,,Users,2.9.2,low,normal,Future Release,enhancement,new,,2010-02-26T21:01:06Z,2010-04-23T18:32:10Z,"One of the basic features of wordpress is to avoid having users edit core files. It is impossible to properly customise wp-login without manually editing the file directly - not good for upgrades! Need to make login_header function pluggable or add a do_action hook before the- Caption goes here
tag Need to add a login_footer. In fact what is required was highlighted in #4478 complete with diff file. This was marked as resolved BUT IT WAS NOT! I agree it might be a duplicate of issue #9682 BUT the underlying issue of being able to overwrite the login-header function WAS **NOT** solved. (see recent support forum requests #252094 and #333994) The solution MUST allow a replacement of login header (and even better also a replacement of the - text
- ,