| 3 | | If you think it's better for me to use `if-js` instead of `no-js`, that's certainly an easy enough change to make, but I was trying to be consistent from the get-go. |
| | 3 | If you think it's better for me to use `hide-if-js` or `hide-if-no-js` instead of `no-js`, that's certainly an easy enough change to make, but I was trying to be consistent from the get-go. |
| | 4 | |
| | 5 | In addition, I think the concept (at least, based on their names) of `hide-if-js` and `hide-if-no-js` is different than the concept of `no-js`. I'm not hiding or showing anything with JavaScript, I am simply using it to determine whether or not JavaScript is active in the browser (if it's not, we use the standard CSS pseudo-element `:hover`; if it is, we use JavaScript to add a `hover` class to items after the timeout occurs). |
