WordPress.org

Make WordPress Core

Opened 12 months ago

Last modified 7 months ago

#21169 new defect (bug)

remove_action on a tag within do_action for that tag can cause actions to be missed

Reported by: devesine Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone: Future Release
Component: Plugins Version:
Severity: major Keywords: has-patch needs-testing 3.6-early
Cc:

Description

Problem:

If an action (or filter) in a given priority for a given tag removes itself as part of its execution, and it was the only action/filter at that priority for that tag (or only one remaining), the next priority level is skipped.

Reproduction:

See the attached unit test.

Analysis:

This appears to possibly be a bug (or at least an undocumented feature) of PHP (tested up to 5.4.3), where next() falls over if the current array element is unset (but each() has no problem even if the /next/ array element is unset). Example non-WP code demonstrating this is included.

Proposed solution / workaround:

Switch all uses of next() in plugin.php to use each() instead; I've included a proposed patch.

Props to smathiascrowdfavorite for bringing this bug to my attention.

Attachments (10)

next-to-each-unit.patch (1.1 KB) - added by devesine 12 months ago.
next-to-each.patch (2.4 KB) - added by devesine 12 months ago.
next-to-each-php.php (1.0 KB) - added by devesine 12 months ago.
each-perf.php (287 bytes) - added by devesine 12 months ago.
next-perf.php (293 bytes) - added by devesine 12 months ago.
next-to-each-r2.patch (2.4 KB) - added by devesine 12 months ago.
next-to-each-r3.patch (2.2 KB) - added by devesine 11 months ago.
next-to-each-unit-r2.patch (1.1 KB) - added by devesine 11 months ago.
next-to-each-22075.patch (2.4 KB) - added by devesine 9 months ago.
next-to-each-unit-1057.patch (1.1 KB) - added by devesine 9 months ago.

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (26)

devesine12 months ago

comment:1 devesine12 months ago

My mistake, props to ssmathias for bringing this bug to my attention.

devesine12 months ago

comment:2 devesine12 months ago

Also disregard next-to-each.2.patch, it is an accidental duplicate.

comment:3 SergeyBiryukov12 months ago

Closed #17817 as a duplicate. Also related: #9968.

comment:4 scribu12 months ago

  • Keywords needs-testing added

Some performance tests?

comment:5 scribu12 months ago

If it weren't for the performance consideration, we would just use a foreach.

devesine12 months ago

devesine12 months ago

comment:6 devesine12 months ago

A quick performance test (based on phpbench.com's iteration test code, modified to behave like the current and proposed functionality; attached) suggests that each() may in fact be a bit faster than next().

Runtimes for next():

0.00029993057250977
0.00030994415283203
0.00030922889709473
0.00030899047851562
0.00034213066101074
0.00031399726867676
0.00032401084899902
0.00030303001403809
0.00029993057250977
0.00030112266540527

Runtimes for each():

0.00015902519226074
0.0001521110534668
0.00014805793762207
0.00015783309936523
0.00016498565673828
0.00014805793762207
0.00014400482177734
0.00016307830810547
0.00014400482177734
0.00016307830810547

Version 0, edited 12 months ago by devesine (next)

devesine12 months ago

comment:7 devesine12 months ago

Updated the patch to properly check for each() === false.

comment:8 scribu12 months ago

  • Milestone changed from Awaiting Review to 3.5

Awesome.

comment:9 scribu12 months ago

Similar: #21172

comment:10 nacin11 months ago

Some thoughts:

  • The is_null() checks can also go. See #21321.
  • Not sure if there is a need to cast $next['value'] to an array. If we found an element in $wp_filter[ $tag ] (as in, !== false), it's going to be an array of functions tied to a priority, and not anything else.

Both changes should shave a bit of time off of this.

comment:11 nacin11 months ago

In [21287]:

Remove unnecessary is_null() checks from the worker loops inside do_action(), apply_filters(), etc. fixes #21321. see #21169.

devesine11 months ago

comment:12 follow-up: devesine11 months ago

next-to-each-r3.patch removes the (array) cast and refreshed to apply against r21293.

next-to-each-unit-r2.patch refreshed to apply against [UT930].

comment:13 in reply to: ↑ 12 ; follow-up: devesine9 months ago

comment:14 in reply to: ↑ 13 westi8 months ago

Replying to devesine:

next-to-each-unit-1057.patch refreshed against [UT1057].

Committed in [UT1096] sorry I forget to give props :(

comment:15 follow-up: nacin7 months ago

  • Keywords 3.6-early added
  • Milestone changed from 3.5 to Future Release

This looks awesome but I am nervous about something like this for 3.5. [21287], for example, blew up in my face months ago, which is why I never came back to this. Let's try this for early 3.6.

comment:16 in reply to: ↑ 15 devesine7 months ago

Replying to nacin:

Would it be helpful to your peace of mind (regarding this ticket specifically) to increase the unit test coverage of action priority execution flow? For example, #21172 demonstrates another priority-handling edge case.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.