Ticket #5065 (closed enhancement: duplicate)

Opened 4 years ago

Last modified 4 years ago

Unify User-Agent strings

Reported by: docwhat Owned by: jacobsantos
Priority: normal Milestone:
Component: General Version:
Severity: normal Keywords: privacy user-agent
Cc:

Description

In WordPress 2.3, there are either 10 or 11 places where User-Agent strings are created.

I would like to suggest adding a function, wp_user_agent() which would generate the base User-Agent including things like PHP version and bloginfo('url'). It could optionally take an array (in hash form) to append extra values, like Akismet version, etc.

Example Usage:

$http_response .= "User-Agent: ".wp_user_agent(Array('Akismet' => '2.0'));

This would prevent repetition of code and allow for admins or plugin developers to add or remove information they are not comfortable sending out.

Ciao!

Attachments

wp-user-agent-filtered.diff Download (5.4 KB) - added by Otto42 4 years ago.
Filtered patch
wp-user-agent.patch Download (6.1 KB) - added by docwhat 4 years ago.
Best version - includes filter and akismet changes.
wp-free-agent.php Download (925 bytes) - added by docwhat 4 years ago.

Change History

I have attached patch. I tried to follow the coding style as best as I could.

I changed the way the bloginfo('url') is appended to the user agent because id didn't follow RFC 2068. I put it in a comment (parenthesis) instead. I don't think that's an issue because according to photomatt, it isn't being used yet.

Ciao!

Also, my patch deliberately didn't change the Incutio and Snoopy UA strings, since they didn't seem to reflect anything. I don't actually understand when they are called, so I'm not sure what difference it makes.

Ciao!

Okay, I just updated the patch because I missed the magpie stuff. I'm not quite sure about the code that adds a trailing ')' to the user-agent, but I don't think the output would be changed in anyway.

My only other concern is that the define at the top may be called too early for the wp_user_agent() function to be available.

Ciao!

Added bug #5085, which is similar in spirit, though more complex.

Okay, this isn't complete.

It needs some sort of filter hook thingy. I'm not familiar with doing that. Can someone point me at an example or suggest a mechanism to do this?

Otherwise, you cannot write a plugin to disable or change it. :-/

Ciao!

Attaching the same patch with a filter on wp_user_agent output.

Otto424 years ago

Filtered patch

That was so easy. Neat! Thanks Otto42!

I thought the filter might have to be pre-registered or something.

I'm going to update the patch (mine) one more time to add the filter, and to add the missing akismet plugin patch (because that's needed too).

Then I'll attach the plugin to anonymize the ua.

Ciao!

docwhat4 years ago

Best version - includes filter and akismet changes.

Alrighty!

Now how do we get it approved and into the svn tree?

Ciao!

  • Keywords has-patch added
  • Milestone changed from 2.5 to 2.4

docwhat4 years ago

  • Milestone changed from 2.4 to 2.3.1

+1

  • Milestone changed from 2.3.1 to 2.4

f00f, please don't change milestones. There is severe symptom that would justify putting this in a maint. release.

Update:

I've been running this patch (with the plugin) for over a month with no problems.

Ciao!

I'm thinking a better method might be to wrap all outgoing http requests into a WP function. Currently theres a fair few fsockopen() scattered around the place, and theres Snoopy too, What would be better is a function such as:

function wp_get_remote($url,$headers=false){
...
$userAgent = apply_filters('useragent',get_the_useragent());
...
fsockopen()...
if(!$headers)
return $html;
else
return array($html,$headers);
}

(Similar to wp_get_http_headers())

Just makes more sense than changing the user agents in all these different locations to me, Why change the code in so many places when it could all just be consolidated in one swoop?, It would also help in adding Global Proxy support in.

(Probably new ticket material, infact, i swear there is one, i just cant find it).

Yeah. Maybe #4779 is what you were looking for DD32?

  • Milestone changed from 2.5 to 2.6

With the changes in 2.5 is this still valid?

  • Owner changed from anonymous to jacobsantos
  • Status changed from new to assigned
  • Status changed from assigned to closed
  • Resolution set to duplicate
  • Milestone 2.9 deleted

This is mostly implemented in #4779. The API isn't used everywhere, but it eventually will be.

  • Keywords has-patch removed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.