Opened 16 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#10017 closed enhancement (duplicate)
Custom taxonomy edit page doesnt change "Tag" titles
Reported by: |
|
Owned by: |
|
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Priority: | normal | |
Severity: | normal | Version: | 2.8 |
Component: | Taxonomy | Keywords: | needs-patch |
Focuses: | Cc: |
Description
Take for example, This code:
add_action( 'init', 'theme_taxonomies', 5 ); function theme_taxonomies() { register_taxonomy( 'people', 'post', array( 'hierarchical' => false, 'label' => 'People', 'query_var' => true, 'rewrite' => true ) ); }
the result is that a link is made under Posts which links to edit-tags.php?taxonomy=people
If you visit this page, The taxonomy "People" is not mentioned anywhere, Eg, "Popular Tags", "Add a New Tag", etc.
IMO, It would be beneficial if edit-tags.php was changed to allow "Add New %s"/etc.
Change History (5)
#3
@
16 years ago
- Type changed from defect (bug) to enhancement
would be nice to have the plurals, yeah
#4
@
16 years ago
- Cc nmac added
I've been working with custom content types and found the ability to add new taxonomies really really useful. The downside is that while I can call edit-tags.php?taxonomy=mytaxonomyname the labels on this admin page all refer to tags - as noted above.
I made some minor mods to edit-tags.php to make the page more generic to taxonomies - purely cosmetic.
For example: remove $title = ('Tags'); line 12, and add these two lines at line 20
$taxonomy_object = get_taxonomy( $taxonomy );
$title = $taxonomy_object->label;
Elsewhere for labels and headings, remove the word tag, so Add New Tag becomes Add New.
Works for me, although I would love to see this in the core. Plurals of course would be nice, but generic statements work as the page has a bit title TAXONOMY NAME.
Great work guys.
Another item which was brought up by someone on #wordpress-dev(Sorry, cant remember the name) was that plural forms of taxonomy's would be nice..
Ie. You've got a Tag, and Tags. People and Person, or Friends and Friend.. etc..
any input from anyone on that?