Context Navigation

Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #10734, comment 28

-                      initial
+                      v1
 And now we're arguing in circles.
 No, it's not hard. But it's the polar opposite of what ''should'' be done. Theme Developers shouldn't have to ''undo'' something that should never have been done in the first place. Theme developers ''shouldn't have to'' fix core's invalid markup. Theme developers ''shouldn't have to'' implement workarounds to undo arbitrary styling.
+No, it's not hard. But it's the polar opposite of what ''should'' be done. Theme Developers ''shouldn't have to'' undo something that should never have been done in the first place. Theme developers ''shouldn't have to'' fix core's invalid markup. Theme developers ''shouldn't have to'' implement workarounds to undo arbitrary styling.
 Core does not define styling for any other markup. Why does gallery markup get this special dispensation - and to the degree that it is deemed so vitally important that it causes core to output invalid markup in order to implement?
+Core does not define styling for any other markup. Why does gallery markup get this special dispensation - and to the degree that it is deemed so vitally important that it is allowed to cause core to output invalid markup in order to implement?
 Further: the argument that it's easy to fix rather invalidates the hyperbolic assertion that fixing it would cause breakage for millions of users.