#11139 closed defect (bug) (fixed)
minor trackback_rdf() fix
Reported by: | ramiy | Owned by: | ramiy |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | 3.0 | Priority: | low |
Severity: | trivial | Version: | 2.8.5 |
Component: | Comments | Keywords: | needs-depreceating needs-patch |
Focuses: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
To remove in 3.0
Attachments (1)
Change History (14)
#3
@
15 years ago
- Keywords needs-depreceating added; has-patch removed
- Milestone changed from 2.9 to Future Release
- Type changed from task (blessed) to defect (bug)
#5
@
15 years ago
We removed the calls to this in the default/classic themes back in 1.5.x in [2417].
I think we can just deprecate the functions - and they can return nothing as we use the rel="trackback"
method for discovery.
#9
follow-up:
↓ 13
@
14 years ago
- Resolution fixed deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
This should be reverted. It breaks Trackback auto-discovery. rel="trackback"
isn't a standardized discovery mechanism. Movable Type doesn't use it. The only standard discovery mechanism is the RDF block that was excised. It's fine that our bundled themes don't have it, but we shouldn't be breaking it for third party themes that have chosen to implement it.
#12
@
14 years ago
After some discussion with Mark it became obvious that while we no longer use the function in bundled themes, it should remain for the use by other themes.
Fun reading: http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-hackers/2005-July/001706.html and http://foolswisdom.com/movable-type-to-support-pingback/comment-page-1/#comment-108014.
#13
in reply to:
↑ 9
@
14 years ago
Replying to markjaquith:
This should be reverted. It breaks Trackback auto-discovery.
rel="trackback"
isn't a standardized discovery mechanism. Movable Type doesn't use it. The only standard discovery mechanism is the RDF block that was excised. It's fine that our bundled themes don't have it, but we shouldn't be breaking it for third party themes that have chosen to implement it.
My bad I thought the new way was the way everyone used - I'm sure I read around at the time but obviously I got it wrong :-(
I don't think we need this function at all anymore.
I guess it would be better just to depreceate it and return empty content as the discovery is automatic now.