Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #12702, comment 67
- Timestamp:
- 03/10/2016 06:42:39 PM (9 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #12702, comment 67
initial v1 37 37 3. Same as above I would suspect. I don't believe anybody believes that the current implementation is ideal either, and we'd all like for a new way to do it. Once again though, it is the implementation we have today and there is no roadmap that I'm aware of to replace it in core. 38 38 39 In terms of performance concerns, I get that it's far from the idea solution. However there's nothing that would prevent those concerns from occurring the way it works now, and there's no way to be sure that just by having this enabled would be any worse than now. If it's really asso bad as to be a great concern, let's deprecate the entire thing in a future version.39 In terms of performance concerns, I get that it's far from the idea solution. However there's nothing that would prevent those concerns from occurring the way it works now, and there's no way to be sure that just by having this enabled would be any worse than now. If it's really so bad as to be a great concern, let's deprecate the entire thing in a future version. 40 40 41 41 The fact that sticky posts on CPTs work out of the box, limited only by the display of the checkbox in the UI is the source of this ask. The functionality is 98% complete, so can we just do the last 2%? Since there is no imminent replacement, and no imminent plan to remove sticky posts for 'post' post types from core, I'm suggesting this one small tweak.