#12722 closed defect (bug) (reported-upstream)
Concurrent editing of widgets
Reported by: |
|
Owned by: |
|
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Priority: | normal | |
Severity: | normal | Version: | |
Component: | Widgets | Keywords: | has-patch bulk-reopened |
Focuses: | Cc: |
Description
When two admin users edit widgets at the same time which ever one saves last wins. I think we'd need something like the post edit lock to be able warn users when someone else is already editing widgets.
Attachments (1)
Change History (14)
#7
@
10 years ago
- Keywords has-patch added; needs-patch removed
- Milestone changed from Future Release to 3.6
the gift of 3.2-early keeps on giving, and I think this is a great fit for the editing / locking / autosave vibes of this release.
I attached a first run at this. I had to write some JS to make the lock messages stay in tune with the sortable / draggable widget block things, but this overall widget-locking concept wasn't wildly complicated to implement
Feedbacks?
#8
@
10 years ago
- Keywords 3.7-early added; 3.2-early removed
- Milestone changed from 3.6 to Future Release
This is cool. Obviously too late for 3.6 now, but would be great for 3.7. Needs to be re-coded to leverage the heartbeat and probably an abstraction of some of the new locking code.
#10
@
10 years ago
- Milestone changed from 3.7 to Future Release
No one has touched this since my initial patch
#11
@
8 years ago
I'm starting to look at this in relation to concurrent editing in the Customizer: #31436
#12
@
8 years ago
- Keywords 3.7-early removed
For the issue of conflicting auto-incremented widget IDs across user sessions, I've opened #32183.
#15
@
4 years ago
- Keywords bulk-reopened added
- Resolution set to reported-upstream
- Status changed from new to closed
There's a proposal to replace the widget screen as part of phase 2 of Gutenberg—GB13204. I've mentioned this issue there.
Also noting that #31436 will cover handling this for the customizer.
As such, I'll close this issue as 'reported upstream'.
You had me at "the same time." Agreed.