includes_url() - In addition to the existing plugins_url and site_url etc..

[sc0ttkclark]

I believe includes_url() is the logical next step for a function name to get the includes url. If it is recommended to use site_url() etc then to add this additional function would keep with the format of the others and maintain the standard going forward.

[filosofo]

The only client resources in wp-includes are registered with the scripts and styles API, so why would you need this?

[nacin]

This function already exists. I neglected it in my WCMA presentation moments ago, hence Scott created a ticket.

Austin- - benefit would be SSL handling.