Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #17004, comment 6
- Timestamp:
- 03/31/2011 11:11:47 PM (14 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #17004, comment 6
initial v1 1 17004.2.diff looks good, I was with the impression that similar functionality already was in jQuery. Maybe consider opening an enhancement ticket on jQuery's trac, it would be useful to have a native way of escaping selectors as that's a limitation in jQuery (in HTML option value can contain CDATA).1 @jacobwg 17004.2.diff looks good, I was with the impression that similar functionality already was in jQuery. Maybe consider opening an enhancement ticket on jQuery's trac, it would be useful to have a native way of escaping selectors as that's a limitation in jQuery (in HTML option value can contain CDATA). 2 2 3 However I think #10030 and [13539] that brought this issue in the first place can be optimized a bit. Perhaps that block of code can be simplified to compare the user entered values instead of repeatedly checking for duplicates in the already created `<option value="...">`. 3 However I think #10030 and [13539] that brought this issue in the first place can be optimized a bit. Perhaps that block of code can be simplified to compare the user entered values instead of repeatedly checking for duplicates in the already created `<option value="...">`. That will also resolve this ticket.