#1713 closed defect (bug) (fixed)
User-Agent Used to Confirm Pingbacks Should not be Blank
Reported by: |
|
Owned by: |
|
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Priority: | high | |
Severity: | major | Version: | 1.5.2 |
Component: | XML-RPC | Keywords: | pingback user-agent bg|has-patch bg|commit |
Focuses: | Cc: |
Description
[[Note: While this problem has been caused by a plugin, I do believe that it is a WordPress issue.]]
Currently, WordPress seems to confirm pingbacks using a blank user-agent. This is a common technique used by spammers to avoid spam filters, and as such, it is now blocked by Michael Hampton's "Bad Behavior" v1.2.2. Any attempt to send a pingback while using Bad Behavior v1.2.2 will fail, because the confirmation request from the pinged blog will be blocked for having no user-agent. While this problem has been caused by a plugin, I do believe that it is a WordPress issue. WordPress should not be using common spamming techniques. And, after all, why not identify WordPress' confirmation requests with a user-agent like "WordPress"?
Michael Hampton's "Bad Behavior" can be found here: http://www.ioerror.us/software/bad-behavior/
Attachments (1)
Change History (8)
#2
@
18 years ago
Yeah, we need to consolidate everything into one function, which makes judgements about what methods are supported on the server, and then behaves similarly in terms of user agent whichever method chosen.
#3
@
18 years ago
- Milestone set to 1.6
I dropped in a quick patch which puts a user-agent string in the outbound connections; it'll get you up and running for now, but long-term a lot of this duplicate code really should be consolidated.
The root cause of the problem is that there's a lot of duplicate code in WP as regards making outbound HTTP connections. Instead of just adding a user-agent here, I would suggest actually cleaning house and getting rid of all the duplicate code.