#17851 closed enhancement (fixed)
Wrapping Sections with add_settings_section
Reported by: | griffinjt | Owned by: | audrasjb |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | 6.1 | Priority: | normal |
Severity: | normal | Version: | 3.1.3 |
Component: | Administration | Keywords: | has-patch good-first-bug has-unit-tests needs-dev-note commit |
Focuses: | Cc: |
Description
This is my first time reporting, so excuse my ignorance. I just wanted to see about enhancing the add_settings_section function.
As of now, individual sections are not wrapper in any sort of container, which makes no sense to semantic sense to me. Sections should/need to be styled differently, but as of now, you really don't have much control of that.
I propose something similar to the register_sidebar function, looking like this:
add_settings_section( $id, $title, $callback, $page, $args )
$args would accept 3 parameters: before_section, after_section, and section_class.
This way you can style each individual section with relative ease. Just a thought and enhancement to the Settings API.
Thomas
Attachments (8)
Change History (46)
#2
@
13 years ago
I understand. I just thought it would be nice for UI (e.g. jQuery accordion to keep everything on one page and manageable for lots of options)
#3
@
13 years ago
If you need an accordion to keep your options visibly in check, then you probably have too many options :-)
#5
@
13 years ago
This is something that might end up happening in #16413.
I think it would be fine to just have a wrapping div with an ID generated from the section ID.
#7
@
13 years ago
- Milestone Awaiting Review deleted
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Status changed from new to closed
I like the idea of automatically adding an id attribute.
Closing as duplicate of #16413
#8
@
13 years ago
- Component changed from General to Administration
- Keywords needs-patch 3.3-early added; ui-feedback removed
- Milestone set to Future Release
- Resolution duplicate deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
On second thought, #16413 seems pretty messy.
Automatically wrapping sections in a div and adding id attributes to field rows is a piece of cake.
#9
@
13 years ago
That would be perfect. Just something to differentiate between sections is all that is needed :)
#10
@
13 years ago
- Keywords has-patch added; needs-patch removed
I figured that a "settings-field" class isn't necessary, since you can target fields using .form-table tr
#13
@
13 years ago
- Keywords 3.3-early removed
- Milestone changed from Future Release to 3.3
If we make no progress on the settings api at all, we can at least do this and it will be a nice step forward.
@
9 years ago
Add new $args to add_settings_section. Update add_settings_section to include new $args in array. Add wrapper around printout in do_settings_section.
#20
@
9 years ago
Just put a patch in. First-time patcher - not positive everything was done kosher.
Looking at the history - this looks like something that could be a good little enhancement. I kept backwards-compatibility while also pushing towards more logical handling. Not sure if there is a way to degrade the current add_settings_section arguments to a single $args array without breaking compatibility - but could be nice if there was.
#22
@
8 years ago
- Keywords needs-unit-tests needs-testing added; needs-refresh removed
Swinging back around to this patch and it looks like it needed a refresh as template.php changed a little in the intervening year.
This request still seems relevant -> just updated the patch to match the current template.php
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by sergey. View the logs.
2 years ago
@
2 years ago
Patch #17851.patch refreshed against trunk, updated with coding standards, docblock updates, and the new, but unused, $section variable is now used.
This ticket was mentioned in PR #3099 on WordPress/wordpress-develop by martinkrcho.
2 years ago
#26
This PR improves the add_settings_section
function to allow developers to pass extra HTML mark-up to be rendered before and after the settings section. Extra argument $args
can now be passed to the function. It's an array that can contain the following items:
before_section
after_section
section_class
Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/17851
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by audrasjb. View the logs.
2 years ago
#28
@
2 years ago
- Keywords changes-requested needs-dev-note needs-testing added
As per today's bug scrub, @costdev mentioned:
Multiple-assertion test methods in the PR will need a $message parameter added to each assertion (Ref) -> "This parameter should always be used if more than one assertion is used in a test method."
Let's update the provided unit tests.
Self assigning for proper testing.
#30
@
2 years ago
- Keywords has-dev-note added; changes-requested needs-dev-note removed
I added the messages to each of the new assertions in commit df015d79b8120b1f0312568b41ce3dd0e1d62667. You can go ahead with testing the ticket properly, @audrasjb :)
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by martin.krcho. View the logs.
2 years ago
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by chaion07. View the logs.
2 years ago
#33
@
2 years ago
Thanks @griffinjt for reporting this. We reviewed this ticket during a recent bug-scurb session. Based on the feedback received from the team here's a summary:
- The PR is ready for review
- We need @audrasjb feedback on the PR and possibly a follow up message
- Need more eyes on this
Cheers!
Props to @mukesh27 and @martinkrcho
#34
follow-up:
↓ 37
@
2 years ago
- Keywords needs-dev-note commit added; needs-testing has-dev-note removed
- Status changed from reviewing to accepted
Looks good to go on my side.
I was able to add extra HTML content before and after the settings section I created, and a class using the %s
placeholder.
Let's go with this implementation, thanks everyone.
PS: @martinkrcho please don't remove the needs-dev-note
keyword since it indicates that we need a developer note on make.wordpress.org/core for this change :)
2 years ago
#36
Committed in https://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/54247
#37
in reply to:
↑ 34
@
2 years ago
Replying to audrasjb:
PS: @martinkrcho please don't remove the
needs-dev-note
keyword since it indicates that we need a developer note on make.wordpress.org/core for this change :)
I'll keep it in mind for next time. Thank you for committing the changes.
#38
@
2 years ago
@mukesh27 added to props via make/core per comment #33.
The goal of the settings API is to relieve the developer of any choices of markup and style. Ideally, the core UI styles should be used wherever possible. It also keeps us flexible -- As an example, we plan to kill the table markup in 3.3.