Opened 13 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#18163 new feature request
Include more usermeta fields in the Network Admin's "Add User" view
Reported by: | danielbachhuber | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Future Release | Priority: | normal |
Severity: | normal | Version: | |
Component: | Networks and Sites | Keywords: | has-patch |
Focuses: | ui, administration, multisite | Cc: |
Description
The view for adding a new user in single site instances includes many useful fields (e.g. first name, last name, a checkbox for whether the user should be emailed the password, etc.)
We should replicate this in the network admin to keep the super admin from having to edit each individual profile.
Relevant views:
- /wp-admin/network/user-new.php
Attachments (6)
Change History (34)
#3
@
13 years ago
- Keywords ux-feedback removed
In favor of consistency.
(That said I think the bigger inconsistency is between the add existing user on the users list table and on the Add New screen. Want those to be the same.
#6
@
9 years ago
- Keywords needs-patch added
Closing as maybelater. Complete lack of interest on the feature on the ticket over the last 4 years. Feel free to reopen when more interest re-emerges (particularly if there's a patch).
#7
@
9 years ago
Noting that the ticket here did not actually get closed, which is ok. :)
The network admin's Add User definitely needs improvement. I would love to see additional user meta fields exposed here.
#8
@
9 years ago
Added screenshots of the current state. It would be nice to have at least "First Name" and "Last Name" added to the new network user screen and to the new site/network user form.
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core-multisite by jeremyfelt. View the logs.
8 years ago
#10
@
8 years ago
- Keywords has-patch added; needs-patch removed
Hi,
I added two fields in Add a new user to the site and network view. First name and Last name. I added a screenshot if you want to see the changes.
By the way, I am agree with #comment:3, this is a really issue in my opinion for two reasons :
1) Bad UX, we don't always understand in the first time the difference between the two forms
2) There are plugins that add some fields in the new user form, and those fields are displayed in the both forms instead of only the new user one. If we want to fix this in only one form, we should find a good UX with a notice for the email and username field maybe like "Type the username of an existing user if you want to add him to this site".
Maybe we should open a second ticket for this both forms problem, what do you think ?
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core-multisite by florian-tiar. View the logs.
8 years ago
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core-multisite by paaljoachim. View the logs.
8 years ago
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core-multisite by florian-tiar. View the logs.
8 years ago
#17
@
8 years ago
- Focuses ui accessibility added
Added UI and accessibility focus, as any proposed change in the UI, especially when related to form fields, should preserve UI consistency and accessibility.
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #accessibility by afercia. View the logs.
7 years ago
#19
@
7 years ago
- Focuses accessibility removed
Removing the accessibility focus to clean up our reports, as per today's bug scrub.
#20
@
7 years ago
Removing the accessibility focus; this is a pretty basic form - Andrea's comment should serve as sufficient reminder to check UI and accessibility, if this moves forward.
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core-multisite by florian-tiar. View the logs.
7 years ago
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core-multisite by flixos90. View the logs.
7 years ago
#24
@
7 years ago
Related to #36656, let's hold off working on this ticket until the multisite REST API endpoints are in core. We can then focus on all sorts of improvements to the Add User screen in the network admin.
#26
@
5 years ago
I submitted a duplicate ticket, sorry https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/49786#ticket
FWIW, I am much less concerned with the existing v. new user and simply adding in first, last and website to match single installs. This should be an achievable first step?
Related: #18160 #18161 #18162 #17948