#18547 closed defect (bug) (wontfix)
Add rel="nofollow" to reply to comments link
Reported by: | pearsonified | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Priority: | normal | |
Severity: | minor | Version: | 3.2.1 |
Component: | Comments | Keywords: | |
Focuses: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
This is an easy problem to diagnose and fix. Basically, the reply to comment links all contain a query parameter—?replytocom—in the destination URL.
Google does a poor job of "deciding" whether or not these are unique URLs, and as a result, these URLs are often indexed. This leads to duplicate content issues, which leads to users bitching :D
Here's a sample of some search results where the ?replytocom query parameter resulted in a bunch of duplicate indexing:
Thanks!
Change History (16)
#2
@
13 years ago
- Milestone Awaiting Review deleted
- Resolution set to invalid
- Status changed from new to closed
It's fixed in WordPress 3.2.
If you do a search from 4th July to today there won't be any ?replytocom links indexed.
#4
@
13 years ago
- Resolution invalid deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
This is incorrect. The issue is NOT fixed in WordPress 3.2 (or 3.2.1).
A rel="nofollow" tag is added to the link in line 1060 of comment-template.php, but the link in line 1062 also needs to have rel="nofollow" added to it as well.
I just tested this (logged in and not logged in) on socialtriggers.com, and you can go there and see for yourself that the reply links are not nofollowed.
#6
@
13 years ago
- Resolution invalid deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
Where is this added? I don't see those meta tags in the document <head>, and if I did, that would be an outrage, simply because comments appear on posts that should be indexed.
Why have an unbalanced solution here? If rel="nofollow" appears in line 1060 (output case #1), then it should also appear in line 1062 (output case #2).
#8
@
13 years ago
- Component changed from General to Comments
- Severity changed from normal to minor
pearsonified is correct on this.
Line 1062 needs rel="nofollow" added, just as line 1060 does.
The lines are similar to lines 1111 & 1113, which both correctly have rel="nofollow" added.
Edited to add the following:
And yes, I see that another method has already been implemented, that of treating ?replytocom pages as non-public pages via a meta tag. At this point, Occam's Razor comes into play:
As a meta tag:
- Robots can still visit the pages, thus resulting in an unnecessary increase in server load for sites with lots of comments (and thus lots of comment reply links)
- An extra filter must be processed by WordPress
As a rel="nofollow":
- No extra processing (it's just a tiny HTML attribute; no PHP logic required)
- Robots don't load the ?replytocom pages at all
I'm not sure why a non-rel="nofollow" solution would ever be mentioned here; it solves the issue with zero overhead.
#10
@
13 years ago
I did read those. It doesn't make sense to argue so convincingly to _remove_ the nofollow attribute from the link, and then insert a meta tag to tell Google to ignore the ?replytocom pages anyway. It's unnecessary server overhead any way you look at it.
#11
follow-up:
↓ 12
@
13 years ago
- Milestone set to Awaiting Review
Howdy guys,
I didn't agree with #10550 at the time it went in. I didn't see enough evidence that it was the right thing to do. Later, #16881 brought along more evidence and arguments. That said, we did fix this in #16893. So let's discuss where we are now.
Processing time is nada either way, so let's scratch that as an argument. Here's the evidence as I see it currently: nofollow means search engines won't crawl the links, reducing server load. But meta tags means that you won't have a penalty for having nofollow on internal links.
Two follow-ups then:
One: I'm not sure if that penalty is real.
Two: Do search engines really not follow nofollow links, or do they follow them and just decline to index them?
Thinking we should literally ask Cutts what is most appropriate for a sizable portion of the web, and implement it. Short of that, we probably should stick with the current status quo.
#12
in reply to:
↑ 11
@
13 years ago
Replying to nacin:
Short of that, we probably should stick with the current status quo.
I guess we could commit ticket:16881:comment-template.17521.php.diff for consistency and to prevent confusion of why is rel="nofollow"
in some places and not in others.
Related: #10550, #16881, #16709, #16893