#19158 closed enhancement (worksforme)
Fix list numbering on Freedoms admin screen
| Reported by: |
|
Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone: | Priority: | normal | |
| Severity: | normal | Version: | 3.2 |
| Component: | Administration | Keywords: | has-patch ui-feedback close |
| Focuses: | Cc: |
Description
The list of 4 freedoms on the Freedoms screen begins with 0, not 1. Issue has existed since that admin screen was introduced in 3.2.
Attached patch fixes Jane's request on original ticket (#17383) to update the original <ol start="0"> code.
Also added "since x.x" to PHPDoc block.
Attachments (3)
Change History (13)
#1
follow-up:
↓ 2
@SergeyBiryukov
6 years ago
#2
in reply to:
↑ 1
;
follow-up:
↓ 4
@kpdesign
6 years ago
Replying to SergeyBiryukov:
I thought starting from 0 was deliberate, and Jane's suggestion was about replacing the deprecated start attribute with CSS. 19158.patch is an attempt to do this.
Why would you start numbering a list with a zero?
#3
@SergeyBiryukov
6 years ago
- Keywords ui-feedback added
#4
in reply to:
↑ 2
@duck_
6 years ago
Replying to kpdesign:
Why would you start numbering a list with a zero?
Because the FSF defines the four freedoms that constitute free software as "freedom 0" through "freedom 3", see What is free software?. I assume it starts at 0 because that's where computers start counting from, e.g. the first index of an array in most languages is 0.
#5
@nacin
6 years ago
- Keywords close added
I'm pretty sure that the start attribute is no longer deprecated in HTML5.
#7
@nacin
6 years ago
- Milestone Awaiting Review deleted
- Resolution set to worksforme
- Status changed from new to closed
#8
@jane
6 years ago
- Type changed from defect (bug) to enhancement
It starts with 0 intentionally, because that is how FSF does it,. As we are liberally quoting them, we are following their system (even though Americans usually don't start from 0 in lists or apartment floors). We absolutely cannot change this to start from 1, and it's not a bug.
#10
@SergeyBiryukov
4 years ago
#22969 was marked as a duplicate.
I thought starting from 0 was deliberate, and Jane's suggestion was about replacing the deprecated start attribute with CSS. 19158.patch is an attempt to do this.