Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
#22833 closed defect (bug) (duplicate)
Reordering of images doesn't work correctly (3.5 RC5)
Reported by: |
|
Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Priority: | normal | |
Severity: | normal | Version: | 3.5 |
Component: | Gallery | Keywords: | |
Focuses: | Cc: |
Description
Hi,
the reordering of images in any gallery doesn't work as it should be.
I've sorted the images in my test gallery - the thumbnails in frontend are sorted correctly, but not the images in the actual gallery view.
Have a look at this and click through the images, there is a difference... http://dev.promicabana.de/?p=631
Change History (6)
#2
@
12 years ago
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/22829 - you can not add old images to a new gallery, otherwise it looks weird in the frontend.
This Ticket: Images can not be sorted correctly. Old or new images...it doesn't matter.
I don't think it's the same issue. Please correct me, if I'm wrong...
#3
@
12 years ago
Sounds like the same underlying issue (no context for adjacent_image_link()
), just different manifestation.
#22829 is about Next/Previous navigation when combining attached and unattached (or attached to another post) images in one gallery.
This ticket is about Next/Previous navigation when the images are sorted differently in the gallery. So, not an exact duplicate, but related.
#4
@
12 years ago
This ticket is about Next/Previous navigation when the images are sorted differently in the gallery.
Ah yes, I missed that.
It all comes back to the same issue, that next/previous are time-based on post_parent rather than the gallery the image is appearing in. So not a duplicate, but it's fate intertwined with #22829
#5
@
12 years ago
Put briefly, attachment pages are not equivalent to a gallery view unless you are using just a plain [gallery] shortcode.
We need to either close both this and #22829, or rename #22829 something like "Specified IDs for the gallery shortcode have no influence on adjacent_image_link()
on attachment post pages", in which case it is a duplicate, because it's the same cause.
I'm confused, how does this differ from your other ticket #22829?