Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #23333, comment 49
- Timestamp:
- 02/07/2013 02:32:17 PM (12 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #23333, comment 49
initial v1 17 17 18 18 - Slightly bigger overhead in creating the font (I volunteer to help out here if need be) 19 - On Firefox, the -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; CSS property doesn't exist, which means Firefox and IE users will see a barely perceptible red and blue haze around the icons ( more info here: http://noscope.com/2012/font-smoothing/)19 - On Firefox, the -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; CSS property doesn't exist, which means Firefox and IE users will see a barely perceptible red and blue haze around the icons (the letters you're reading right now have the same red/blue haze -- more info here: http://noscope.com/2012/font-smoothing/) 20 20 21 21 So I'm definitely in the camp of going flat and light-weight on the icons, provided they become part of a font. Trendy or not, in my experience, the strong silhuette and simplicity of flat icons can almost become a visual identity unto itself.