#25265 closed enhancement (maybelater)
Add mixlr.com to the oEmbed whitelist
Reported by: | mrgeorgegray | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Priority: | normal | |
Severity: | normal | Version: | 3.6 |
Component: | Embeds | Keywords: | has-patch |
Focuses: | Cc: |
Description
Added mixlr.com to wp-includes/class-oembed.php
Attachments (1)
Change History (5)
#2
@
11 years ago
- Resolution set to maybelater
- Status changed from new to closed
Thanks Nacin. We fully take on board everything you've said here. Let's see how the new plugin goes and we'll work on the other points you mentioned and perhaps review this again further down the line.
#3
@
11 years ago
- Milestone Awaiting Review deleted
- Type changed from feature request to enhancement
- Version changed from trunk to 3.6
#4
@
11 years ago
I turned my comment above into a section on our nascent design decisions page: http://make.wordpress.org/core/handbook/design-decisions/#whitelisting-oembed-providers.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
We have a certain standard for oEmbed providers in core. They must be well-established, popular, mainstream services; they must properly implement the oEmbed spec; and they must clearly be a trusted provider. Trust is more than about security — the service must also be "built to last," as if a provider ever stops supporting oEmbed, sites start to lose content they previously trusted would stay embedded permanently. Some nascent services are just too fragile to be material for core.
With regards to establishment and popularity, there are a number of "warning signs":
I see you have just today added a shortcode plugin to WordPress.org. It is best to see what kind of traction/adoption it or any other plugins may receive. (Perhaps notably, it's the only result when searching for "mixlr" in the directory.)