#25905 closed defect (bug) (fixed)
Hook Docs (53): wp-includes/option.php
Reported by: |
|
Owned by: |
|
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | 3.9 | Priority: | normal |
Severity: | normal | Version: | |
Component: | Options, Meta APIs | Keywords: | has-patch commit |
Focuses: | docs | Cc: |
Description
Patch forthcoming.
Attachments (6)
Change History (24)
#3
@
7 years ago
- Summary changed from Hook Docs: wp-includes/option.php to Hook Docs (53): wp-includes/option.php
Still waiting on an initial patch here. You can do it @siobhyb!
#5
@
7 years ago
First pass at inline-docs for filters. Placeholder text currently in place for actions, still working on these.
@
7 years ago
Second pass at inline docs for wp-includes/option.php hooks. Corrected copy and paste error!
#9
@
7 years ago
25905.4.patch adds initial and double checked @since
versions to all hooks. Also fixes parameter spacing to use spaces instead of tabs.
Next iteration will be on content of the hook docs, language tweaks, etc.
#11
@
7 years ago
- Milestone changed from Awaiting Review to 3.9
- Owner changed from DrewAPicture to kpdesign
25905.5.patch should do it. Just needs a second look and a recommendation.
#12
follow-up:
↓ 13
@
7 years ago
How about adding @link links to codex-reference ...because i have seen for some of the fucnctions for eg: get_post_meta(), add_post_meta(),delete_post_meta() etc.,
#13
in reply to:
↑ 12
@
7 years ago
Replying to bravokeyl:
How about addign @link links to codex-reference ...because i have seen for some of the fucnctions for ge: get_post_meta(), add_post_meta(),delete_post_meta() etc.,
Basically the reason we're documenting hooks in this way is because the Codex function references will soon be going away, and will be replaced by the Code Reference parsed from these docs. So, linking related Codex articles might be moot.
#14
follow-up:
↓ 15
@
7 years ago
Okay..i didn't know that...
Then can we take out the existing codex link references ?
#15
in reply to:
↑ 14
@
7 years ago
Replying to bravokeyl:
Okay..i didn't know that...
Then can we take out the existing codex link references ?
It's kind of a double-edged sword :)
We'll probably leave the existing references in place until the Code Reference replaces them, but we won't be introducing a new ones to the documentation in the meantime.
#16
@
7 years ago
- Keywords commit added
25905.6.patch includes a few tweaks to descriptions.
This one's ready to go in. Recommend commit.
FYI: Still working on this. So many hooks!