Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #32470, comment 28
- Timestamp:
- 06/12/2015 12:59:43 PM (11 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #32470, comment 28
initial v1 1 1 Replying to [comment:27 Frank Klein]: 2 > The proposed patch by @jacobsantos seems interesting, but it also is a lot of code movement. This means that it probably won't make it into a release very fast, as a lot of testing would have to be done. But yes, it will still certainly need lots of testing.2 > The proposed patch by @jacobsantos seems interesting, but it also is a lot of code movement. This means that it probably won't make it into a release very fast, as a lot of testing would have to be done. 3 3 4 I think @jacobsantos intends to maintain full backward compatibility. And I think that he's also committed to writing unit tests and integration tests, since that is part of the reason he is proposing these changes. 4 I think @jacobsantos intends to maintain full backward compatibility. And I think that he's also committed to writing unit tests and integration tests, since that is part of the reason he is proposing these changes. But yes, it will still certainly need lots of testing. 5 5 6 6 > Also when working on new abstractions, we need to keep in mind which classes and methods are currently public. We would need to ensure that some form of backwards compatibility is maintained, because currently nothing keeps developers from directly accessing this code in their projects.