Context Navigation

Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #35248, comment 6

initial	v1
1		but i think this thing is not designed very well and maybe it is not too late to change that, becaus~~e rfcs generally are not very strict laws~~, and trailing dot is not widely used but used in "bind" dns server configs etc. i think
	1	but i think this thing is not designed very well and maybe it is not too late to change that, becaus, as i known out from wikipedia several days ago, rfcs are not always very strict laws, there are RFCs with different status, though i do not know of what type are ones about trailing dot, and trailing dot is not widely used but used in "bind" dns server configs etc. i think
2	2	1) trailing dot should not differ by its behaviour from other dots. first dot cannot create additional subdomain, so last dot also should not behave like it is itself something like a domain.
3	3	2) also, ambiguity of domain without last dot is bad thing.