Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #36335, comment 207
- Timestamp:
- 09/24/2016 06:24:21 AM (8 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #36335, comment 207
initial v1 21 21 * only seemingly adds one perceived advantage of its own (tightly optimized custom autoloader), which is not really an advantage, because you can generate this exact same autoloader with Composer Autoloader Generator. 22 22 23 Unless I'm missing something crucial, anddon't see in what ways this solution would be preferable.23 Unless I'm missing something crucial, I don't see in what ways this solution would be preferable. 24 24 25 25 @TJNowell If anyone wants to play around with benchmarks, please go ahead. I personally will not waste time with benchmarks right now. If the goal is to see what autoloader '''implementation''' is faster, then this has nothing to do with Composer/no-Composer. And if the goal is to see whether an autoloader even makes sense in the first place, then I'm baffled, and must admit that we will never find out, because first of all the benefits are not only about performance, and secondly, we would need to implement it and optimize Core for it first to get proof. So, in essence we're trying to benchmark the chicken and egg problem.