Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#38515 closed defect (bug) (fixed)
Twenty Seventeen: ul inside ol is mistakenly ordered
Reported by: |
|
Owned by: |
|
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | 4.7 | Priority: | normal |
Severity: | normal | Version: | 4.7 |
Component: | Bundled Theme | Keywords: | has-patch |
Focuses: | Cc: |
Description
for example, write the bellow
<ol> <li>one</li> <li>two</li> <li>three <ul> <li>ul in the three A</li> <li>ul in the three B</li> <li>ul in the three C</li> </ul> </li> <li>four</li> <li>five</li> </ol>
then it is displayed as the bellow.
1.one 2.two 3.three 4.ul in the three A 5.ul in the three B 6.ul in the three C 7.four 8.five
see http://meta-scheme.jp/8081.
it should be displayed as the bellow.
1.one 2.two 3.three .ul in the three A .ul in the three B .ul in the three C 4.four 5.five
Attachments (3)
Change History (9)
#3
@
8 years ago
Thanks @tg29359 and @Soean!
After talking to @melchoyce and @laurelfulford, it seems like the custom implementation for ordered lists causes a lot of issues with mixed lists. See:
https://cloudup.com/clIe-QvYlYo
38515.2.patch fixes that and goes with more standard styles. It's easier to do that than account for all the edge cases.
#4
@
8 years ago
- Summary changed from ul inside ol is mistakenly ordered with Twenty Seventeen to Twenty Seventeen: ul inside ol is mistakenly ordered
#5
@
8 years ago
Just tested 38515.3.patch; it fixes the issue and looks good!
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Resets the ol list style for nested ul