Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#46084 closed enhancement (duplicate)
Sunset Gravatar as the default option for profile image
Reported by: | mor10 | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Priority: | normal | |
Severity: | normal | Version: | 5.1 |
Component: | Users | Keywords: | |
Focuses: | administration, privacy | Cc: |
Description
To add a user profile photo to a WordPress site without adding a plugin, the user has to create a Gravatar. Creating a Gravatar requires a WordPress.com account. This requires the user of a self-hosted WordPress site to have a WordPress.com account to use a core feature.
Gravatar is a great idea and a great service. However, having a WordPress.com account should not be a prerequisite to use a core feature, especially something as central and expected as a user profile photo. In my opinion.
Having Gravatar be the only core option for user profile pictures introduces several issues including (but not limited to):
- Having to have a WordPress.com account.
- No access to WordPress.com or Gravatar.com from intranets and systems not connected to the web or behind firewalls or geoblockers that block either domain.
- Data collection and privacy concerns (real and/or imagined) around what it means to upload a photo to Gravatar.com / create an account on WordPress.com. (see #45384 as example)
Proposal
- Introduce a core option to use profile photo from media library.
- Sunset Gravatar as core option. Offer Gravatar as plugin.
- Introduce Gravatar-type service not tied to WordPress.com (ideally hosted by WordPress.org or similar).
Change History (5)
#4
in reply to:
↑ 3
@
6 years ago
Replying to earnjam:
Actually, this is sort of a combination of #14682 and #16020. Could probably close as a duplicate.
Although essentially about the same topic, this one here is worded a lot more thoroughly than #16020 where the author just said ‘it would be nice if’. Closing it as a duplicate would remove its coherent reasoning from visibility.
Related #14682