Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #52840, comment 11
- Timestamp:
- 01/13/2023 08:41:32 PM (2 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #52840, comment 11
initial v1 7 7 Another reason is that even greater number of sites/hosting companies replace JPEGs with WebPs on-the-fly, so the filesize meta is totally unusable/has nothing to do with the actual image used. 8 8 9 I was with the impression that the above details about the filesize meta are available as docs (in a docblock) added with #49412, but seems that's not the case. This needs to be fixed. Making it available in the REST API should also come with a good explanation of how unreliable it is and what are the expected use cases. Frankly I don't see any use cases, adding something with no use cases is generally a no-go.9 I was with the impression that the above details about the filesize meta are available as docs (in a docblock) added with #49412, but seems that's not the case. This needs to be fixed. Making it available in the REST API should also come with a good explanation of how unreliable it is and what are the expected uses. Frankly I don't see any good use for it, adding something with no use cases is generally a no-go.