Opened 3 years ago
Closed 16 months ago
#53687 closed defect (bug) (fixed)
`grunt verify:old-files` incorrectly flagging certain files
Reported by: | desrosj | Owned by: | hellofromTonya |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | 6.3 | Priority: | normal |
Severity: | normal | Version: | 5.7 |
Component: | Build/Test Tools | Keywords: | needs-testing needs-patch needs-refresh |
Focuses: | Cc: |
Description
In [50441], a PHPUnit test that verified built files were not included in the $_old_files
list was moved into a Grunt task, verify:old-files
.
For some reason, this is incorrectly flagging a few files that were removed and should be included in this list for WordPress 5.8:
wp-includes/css/dist/editor/editor-styles.min.css
wp-includes/css/dist/editor/editor-styles-rtl.css
wp-includes/css/dist/editor/editor-styles-rtl.min.css
wp-includes/css/dist/editor/editor-styles.css
A build error is only encountered when running build
, build:dev
does not result in an error.
It seems that the -rtl
and .min
parts of the file are the culprit because wp-includes/css/dist/editor/editor-styles.css
is not resulting in the task failing.
I don't necessarily think that this is a blocker for WordPress 5.8. The $_old_files
list is run over for every update. So these files can be added in 5.8.1 and they will be removed appropriately.
Attachments (1)
Change History (29)
#2
@
3 years ago
Chatting with Jon about this, the script is behaving as expected as the failure only appears when these files already exist in src
and are copied over with the build. If these files have been removed from version control and are now built, I think there should be a cleanup so they're removed from src
.
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by desrosj. View the logs.
3 years ago
#5
@
3 years ago
- Milestone 5.8.1 deleted
- Resolution set to invalid
- Status changed from new to closed
Closing this off as the problem is not with the verify:old-files
task. The warning it raised when the files were added to $_old_files
was correct because the files still existed in the local copy.
#6
@
3 years ago
- Resolution invalid deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
Just ran into this too.
the problem is not with the verify:old-files task
Yes, but the results is that npm run build
a.k.a. grunt build
fails/is aborted.
failure only appears when these files already exist in src and are copied over with the build. If these files have been removed from version control and are now built, I think there should be a cleanup so they're removed from src.
This is somewhat similar to #47078. A cleanup of the old built files from both /src and /build sounds like the better solution. Also see #47749.
However cleaning of all built files will not work at the moment as the above four files (and many others) are not being "cleaned" from /src anyway. Running grunt clean --dev
leaves quite a few "built" files behind. Then grunt copy:files
copies a mess of "original" and "built" files. Then most of the copied built files are overwritten when building the js and css or by webpack.
For this ticket is seems it would be enough to exclude the 4 offending files from copying to /build, for now. A better way to fix this and similar cases in the future is to fix grunt clean --dev
and run it together with grunt clean
before every build.
Going to reopen this as it prevents building to /build after building to /src.
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by chaion07. View the logs.
3 years ago
#11
@
3 years ago
Hi @desrosj! Thank you for reporting this. Leaving it on the report for 5.9 and also be happy to push it to future release. Since the build tools don't affect the release code, and also someone can pick it up even during the RC period, keeping my fingers crossed. Cheers!
#12
@
3 years ago
- Milestone changed from 5.9 to 6.0
With 5.9 Beta 1 release happening in a few hours, moving this ticket to 6.0.
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by sergey. View the logs.
3 years ago
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by costdev. View the logs.
2 years ago
#15
@
2 years ago
- Keywords needs-refresh added
- Milestone changed from 6.0 to Future Release
Per the discussion in the bug scrub, I'm moving this ticket to _Future Release_. The patch also needs a refresh, so adding the needs-refresh
keyword too.
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by david.baumwald. View the logs.
2 years ago
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by sergey. View the logs.
2 years ago
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by sergey. View the logs.
2 years ago
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by sergey. View the logs.
2 years ago
#20
@
2 years ago
- Milestone changed from Future Release to 6.1
- Owner set to hellofromTonya
- Status changed from reopened to assigned
Ran into this issue today during Dry Run when running npm run grunt prerelease
. An older file, i.e. src/wp-includes/blocks/heading/editor.css
, was created from an older npm run build:dev
. That files was removed in WP 5.9. As a result, the verify:old-files
grunt task failed as the file was added into the build
folder.
As @azaozz suggests, cleaning src
before running build
would have resolved the issue and the time lost during Dry Run.
Moving this ticket into 6.1 for resolution before 6.1 Dry Run cycle.
#21
@
2 years ago
- Milestone changed from 6.1 to 6.2
This still needs a patch. Punting with 6.1 coming to a close. If a patch is ready and tested before then and a committer is confident in merging, it can be moved back.
#22
@
23 months ago
I ran into this too:
Running "verify:old-files" task Warning: build/wp-includes/blocks/post-comments/editor.css should not be present in the $_old_files array. Use --force to continue.
I like to use npm run build
when I don't need the watch process running.
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by sergey. View the logs.
20 months ago
#24
@
19 months ago
- Milestone changed from 6.2 to 6.3
This still needs a patch. With RC1 next week, punting to 6.3 (which alpha opens next week). However, it can be committed at any time when a patch is ready and a committer is confident in committing it.
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core by oglekler. View the logs.
16 months ago
#27
@
16 months ago
Hi @desrosj and @azaozz can you please take a look if this issue is solved / can be solved by tickets mentioned in the previous comment and if not, possibly page can be refreshed. Let's solve it in 6.3 🙂 Thank you 🙏
For more context, after applying 53687.diff, running
npm run build
results in the following: