Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #54356
- Timestamp:
- 11/01/2021 04:44:24 PM (3 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #54356 – Description
initial v1 1 In https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/35725 we added core support for the WebP image format. On the ticket, discussed studying the best compression level ("quality) setting to use for WebP images ([https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/35725#comment:152 ref], [https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/35725#comment:124 ref], [https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/35725#comment:117 ref], [https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/35725#comment:101 ref). In the end we decided to use the same default quality as JPEG images use for our initial pass.1 In ticket:35725 we added core support for the WebP image format. On the ticket, we discussed studying the best compression level ("quality") setting to use for WebP images ([https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/35725#comment:152 comment 152], [https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/35725#comment:124 comment 124], [https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/35725#comment:117 comment 117], [https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/35725#comment:101 comment 101]). In the end we decided to use the same default quality as JPEG images use for our initial pass. 2 2 3 3 However, given the differences between the formats (and in anticipation of even newer formats), we should consider what the best default quality setting would be for WebP images. 4 4 5 Some details on how we can test compression settings and arrive at an ideal level is outliner in [https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_studythis post].5 Some details on how we can test compression settings and arrive at an ideal level are [https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_study outlined in this post]. 6 6 7 Related: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/536697 Related: #53669