#57480 closed enhancement (fixed)
Editor: Remove unused '__unstableHomeTemplate' "home template" setting.
Reported by: |
|
Owned by: |
|
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | 6.2 | Priority: | normal |
Severity: | normal | Version: | |
Component: | Editor | Keywords: | has-patch gutenberg-merge commit |
Focuses: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
The site editor has been updated to not require the "home template" setting. The Editor's initialization needs updating to remove this unused key / setting.
Reference:
Change History (12)
This ticket was mentioned in PR #3855 on WordPress/wordpress-develop by @youknowriad.
2 years ago
#1
- Keywords has-patch added
#3
@
2 years ago
- Keywords gutenberg-merge commit added; Gutenberg-merge removed
- Owner set to hellofromTonya
- Status changed from assigned to reviewing
Marking for commit
. Self-assigning.
#4
@
2 years ago
Aha just saw the note from @youknowriad
This updates the site initialization to match Gutenberg by removing a key that is not used anymore. That said, we can't land this PR until the package updates happens.
The commit for this needs to wait until the package updates are committed. @youknowriad feel free to self-assign ownership when the time comes to commit. Else, I'll take care of it.
This ticket was mentioned in Slack in #core-editor by hellofromtonya. View the logs.
2 years ago
#6
@
2 years ago
- Description modified (diff)
- Summary changed from Backport the changes to site-editor.php from the Gutenberg plugin. to Editor: Remove unused '__unstableHomeTemplate' "home template" setting.
@hellofromTonya commented on PR #3855:
2 years ago
#8
What are risks to users and extenders by hard removing this setting?
Thinking of backwards-compatibility (BC)
Searched the wporg repos for usage:
- Plugins: only Gutenberg https://wpdirectory.net/search/01GRKKV7J6KGNHJE0TFJQYVQHR
- Themes: 0 (none) https://wpdirectory.net/search/01GRKKZAHWGM93HAX62SRW1CA2
@ntsekouras commented on PR #3855:
2 years ago
#9
What are risks to users and extenders by hard removing this setting?
Thinking of backwards-compatibility (BC)
It seems there is no BC issue. It was discussed in the original GB PR.
#10
@
2 years ago
- Owner set to audrasjb
Re-assigning to myself in replacement of Tonya for the final review/merge. As said above, this changeset needs to wait for package update to be shipped.
@youknowriad commented on PR #3855:
2 years ago
#12
Committed in https://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/55247
Trac ticket https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/57480
Related Gutenberg PRs:
https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/pull/44770
This updates the site initialization to match Gutenberg by removing a key that is not used anymore. That said, we can't land this PR until the package updates happens.
@Mamaduka @ntsekouras