Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #57648, comment 17
- Timestamp:
- 02/17/2023 09:23:04 PM (3 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #57648, comment 17
initial v1 9 9 * `wp_enqueue_global_styles()` with caching (TT1): **5.41ms** (6.2 Beta) vs **3.35ms** (6.1) 10 10 * `wp_enqueue_global_styles()` without caching (TT1): **5.33ms** (6.2 Beta) vs **12.04ms** (6.1) 11 * Note that for block themes, despite effectively the lack of caching in `wp_get_global_stylesheet()`, the code in 6.2 is still faster than in 6.1, which is excellent. I'm almost sad we ever had caching here, since those ~20ms faster performance ofa single function (when considered without caching) are amazing to see :)11 * Note that for block themes, despite effectively the lack of caching in `wp_get_global_stylesheet()`, the code in 6.2 is still faster than in 6.1, which is excellent. I'm almost sad we ever had caching here, since those ~20ms faster performance in TT3 from a single function (when considered without caching) are amazing to see :) 12 12 13 13 Yet, we just have to acknowledge that in the field, we will now have this small regression in the `wp_get_global_stylesheet()` function for classic themes, for the time being. But I believe we are still in a better place than before, as the approach previously was error-prone, and overall WP 6.2 performance sees so many improvements over 6.1 that holistically this little regression will only cause a slight reduction in the overall load time performance wins.