Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #59182, comment 3
- Timestamp:
- 08/26/2023 05:22:21 AM (2 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #59182, comment 3
initial v1 1 1 That `max-width` comes from [48390] (see #9757, starting with 9757.6.patch). 2 2 3 [https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#visual-presentation WCAG recommends limiting the width] of blocks of text to no more than 80 characters. That could leave some space for extending elements other than the table, but I am not in favor of a change. With any adjustment, it could be slightly less than the width of the page. And if text wraps at `80rem` for a paragraph while the table is limited to `40rem`, that might look odd too.3 [https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#visual-presentation WCAG recommends limiting the width] of blocks of text to no more than 80 characters. ~~That could leave some space for extending elements other than the table, but~~ I am not in favor of a change. With any adjustment, it could be slightly less than the width of the page. And if text wraps at `80rem` for a paragraph while the table is limited to `40rem`, that might look odd too. ''Correction:'' I confused units; the current `40rem` can show more than 80 (Latin) characters per line. 4 4 5 5 The current maximum is not good with that error message from WPExtended Pro, but I'm not sure Core should change for situations like this.