Opened 5 months ago
#63701 new defect (bug)
Reviewing Smugmug oEmbed
| Reported by: |
|
Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone: | Awaiting Review | Priority: | normal |
| Severity: | normal | Version: | |
| Component: | Embeds | Keywords: | 2nd-opinion |
| Focuses: | Cc: |
Description
I was checking this report [GB 66075] today. It happens that the Smugmug is completely screwed. I'm not really specialized into analysing the current status of oEmbeds for a Gallery (It's not super easy to find samples for this premium provider because it does not let sharing photos on the trial plan), and maybe it could run the same fate as #61941
Here two examples I've found:
https://footsorefotography.smugmug.com/My-Gallery/i-TG2NNxj
https://waynewetherbeephotography.smugmug.com/My-Gallery/i-VBmLTkp
Here is an Embed code for one of those
{{{{
<iframe src="https://waynewetherbeephotography.smugmug.com/frame/slideshow?key=7kh6Gf&speed=3&transition=fade&autoStart=1&captions=0&navigation=0&playButton=0&randomize=0&transitionSpeed=2" width="800" height="600" frameborder="no" scrolling="no"></iframe>
}}}
One single photo
https://waynewetherbeephotography.smugmug.com/My-Gallery/i-fXzGXvg/A
Are these samples compliant with the current standards for oEmbeds?
@peterwilsoncc could you give it a quick check as you are one of the most experienced on oEmbed atm, and find if the special scenarios for this oEmbed block for this provider could be repaired (slideshow embed, gallery embed, ...)? The fact that by default Embedded content can't be previewed looks bad to me from the oEmbed metadata perspective, but I need a second eye, in case I'm wrong.