Opened 7 weeks ago
Closed 5 weeks ago
#64348 closed defect (bug) (fixed)
The `$embeds` element is missing from the `wp_mail_succeeded` filter
| Reported by: |
|
Owned by: |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone: | 6.9.1 | Priority: | normal |
| Severity: | normal | Version: | 6.9 |
| Component: | Keywords: | good-first-bug has-patch commit fixed-major dev-reviewed | |
| Focuses: | Cc: |
Description
In [60698] the documentation for the wp_mail_succeeded filter was updated to include the $embeds element in its $mail_data argument, but this element is not actually included.
The $embeds element should be added to this array.
Attachments (2)
Change History (16)
#1
@
7 weeks ago
- Keywords has-patch added; needs-patch removed
Title:
Fix missing $embeds element in $mail_data for wp_mail_succeeded filter
Description:
This patch resolves a bug where the $embeds element is missing from the $mail_data array when the wp_mail_succeeded filter is applied. Although WordPress documentation for version 6.9 had been updated to reflect the inclusion of the $embeds element in the $mail_data argument, the actual code was not updated, causing the $embeds element to be absent.
This ticket was mentioned in PR #10594 on WordPress/wordpress-develop by @iflairwebtechnologies.
7 weeks ago
#2
#3
@
7 weeks ago
- Keywords changes-requested added
- Priority changed from low to normal
Nice catch @johnbillion
It's so weird, I have notifications enabled for this component, but I was not notified when this was opened. I'm going to look into it, and report in meta.
@iflairwebtechnologies check Github.
@westonruter commented on PR #10594:
7 weeks ago
#4
I've sent you a PR to add a fix to this.
#10
@
7 weeks ago
- Keywords fixed-major added
- Resolution fixed deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
Re-opening for 6.9 backport consideration.
#11
follow-up:
↓ 12
@
5 weeks ago
@since annotations for the filter changes were missed during the 6.9.0 cycle. I think it would be good to include those while doing a fast-follow. See 64348-docs.diff.
#12
in reply to:
↑ 11
@
5 weeks ago
Replying to peterwilsoncc:
@sinceannotations for the filter changes were missed during the 6.9.0 cycle. I think it would be good to include those while doing a fast-follow. See 64348-docs.diff.
@peterwilsoncc It looks like a superset of this this ended up getting committed by @johnbillion in [61386]?
Fixed : The
$embedselement issue