Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #64368, comment 69
- Timestamp:
- 12/16/2025 12:28:09 AM (6 months ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #64368, comment 69
initial v1 19 19 This reminds me all the requests regarding Google/Bing Seach engine for SEO purposes. WordPress can only stand with "golden rules", not with all the theories that help you push up your rankings or like in this case, help deliverability based on some "relatively well known rules". As I said, Return-Path validity is not a golden rule and as it has been commented above, it seems more of a suggestion. But SPF Alignment IS a golden rule hands down, and it's explicitely stated in the RFC. 20 20 21 The worst part, is that system administrators can easilyhandle Return-Path deliverability, knowingly that at least for now, `wordpress@hostname` is the default address in WordPress (if they are providing WordPress in their service list). But what I call "exemplary users" are completely f**** *p if `Sender` address is not present, having to deal with very complex hooks and knowledge about PHPMailer to fix their problems. WordPress is meant to simplify the life of the exemplary users not the system administrators that should have all the tools in the world to make things happen.21 The worst part, is that system administrators can "somewhat easily" handle Return-Path deliverability, knowingly that at least for now, `wordpress@hostname` is the default address in WordPress (if they are providing WordPress in their service list). But what I call "exemplary users" are completely f**** *p if `Sender` address is not present, having to deal with very complex hooks and knowledge about PHPMailer to fix their problems. WordPress is meant to simplify the life of the exemplary users not the system administrators that should have all the tools in the world to make things happen. 22 22 23 23 [https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64420#comment:1 Please refer to this post], to continue the conversation if needed.