Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #8592, comment 162
- Timestamp:
- 02/02/2014 04:57:54 AM (12 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #8592, comment 162
v1 v2 12 12 '''Status limitation instead of strict inheritance''' 13 13 14 Example: published parent, draft child. If you set parent to "future", the children gets the same status. Such a feature can be annoying. Maybe we should switch to a status limitation feature: A parent status limits the possible status for the descendants. The 'top down' inheritance code should only force a descendant to have the same status if the descendant has an 'higher' status. Example: published parent, future child. If you set the parent to draft, the child should also be set to private.14 Example: published parent, draft child. If you set parent to "future", the children gets the same status. Such a feature can be annoying. Maybe we should switch to a status limitation feature: A parent status limits the possible status for the descendants. The 'top down' inheritance code should only force a descendant to have the same status if the descendant has an 'higher' status. Example: published parent, future child. If you set the parent to draft, the child should also be set to draft. 15 15 16 16 Other example: future parent. A child can be for example draft,private or future but it cannot be published.