WordPress.org

Make WordPress Core

Opened 4 years ago

Last modified 3 years ago

#11360 new enhancement

Don't nofollow links within the site

Reported by: caesarsgrunt Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone: Future Release
Component: Comments Version: 2.9
Severity: normal Keywords: has-patch needs-testing
Cc:

Description

Relative links or links with the site's own domain shouldn't be nofollowed.

This use of nofollow is damaging to the site's search engine rankings.

Attachments (1)

11360.diff (576 bytes) - added by caesarsgrunt 4 years ago.

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (11)

comment:1 caesarsgrunt4 years ago

See also #11359 (Don't nofollow links in admin comments)

caesarsgrunt4 years ago

comment:2 caesarsgrunt4 years ago

  • Keywords has-patch needs-testing added; needs-patch removed

Attached patch (didn't mean to upload it twice...) doesn't add nofollow to links within the site (eg {exapmle.com or /). It does add nofollow to links to other sites (eg google.com), including tricky sites whose domain starts with the siteurl (eg example.com.badsite.com).

comment:3 dd324 years ago

didn't mean to upload it twice...

I just deleted 11360.2.diff to keep things straight forward :)

comment:4 caesarsgrunt4 years ago

Thanks dd32.

I'd quite like some feedback on this patch - is there anything wrong with this approach? If not, it'd be really nice to get it into 2.9... :-)

comment:5 caesarsgrunt3 years ago

  • Milestone changed from Unassigned to 3.0

comment:6 follow-up: hakre3 years ago

Some feedback: How to reflect mixed usage of HTTP and HTTPS in that patch? Any Idea?

comment:7 hakre3 years ago

  • Keywords changed from has-patch, needs-testing to has-patch needs-testing

comment:8 in reply to: ↑ 6 ; follow-up: caesarsgrunt3 years ago

Replying to hakre:

Some feedback: How to reflect mixed usage of HTTP and HTTPS in that patch? Any Idea?

Not sure what you mean... does http/https make any difference in the patch?

comment:9 in reply to: ↑ 8 nacin3 years ago

Replying to caesarsgrunt:

Replying to hakre:

Some feedback: How to reflect mixed usage of HTTP and HTTPS in that patch? Any Idea?

Not sure what you mean... does http/https make any difference in the patch?

The get_option() call there will only return the http:// link, not https://. There's a new function home_url() that could be used, but that still wouldn't prevent an http:// link from not being picked up on a forced SSL site and vice versa.

At the very least, using home_url() makes sense to make sure the right protocol is searched for. Checking both protocols wouldn't be a bad idea though.

comment:10 nacin3 years ago

  • Milestone changed from 3.0 to Future Release
  • Type changed from defect (bug) to enhancement
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.