New taxonomy template

[sebastian.pisula]

I sugest neww taxonomy template: taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php.

taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->slug}.php is bad because if I change slug then I must remember about change filename. In my website this isn't problem but if client change name on website then will be problem.

[swissspidy]

category-{$category->term_id}.php and tag-{$tag->term_id}.php exist as well, but after the slug variant.

So adding taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php seems legit (not taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php)

Example:

$templates[] = "taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->slug}.php"; 
$templates[] = "taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php"; 

[ramiy]

+1

[sebastian.pisula]

WordPress 4.5.0 ? :)

Replying to swissspidy:

category-{$category->term_id}.php and tag-{$tag->term_id}.php exist as well, but after the slug variant.

So adding taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php seems legit (not taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php)

Example:

$templates[] = "taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->slug}.php"; 
$templates[] = "taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php"; 

[theMikeD]

@swissspidy since term IDs are now unique thanks to all the term splitting, why do we need $taxonomy in taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php?

[swissspidy]

Replying to theMikeD:

@swissspidy since term IDs are now unique thanks to all the term splitting, why do we need $taxonomy in taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php?

I suggested it because of consistency.

First, there's already taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->slug}.php, so adding a template with the ID makes sense. Second, this helps developers figuring out what's going on. For example, taxonomy-123.phpsounds like it's the template for a taxonomy with the ID 123. taxonomy-color-123.php is more obvious.

Finally, when the taxonomy name can be left out, term-123.php would make more sense. But again, this would not be consistent with the existing templates..

[theMikeD]

Replying to swissspidy:

Replying to theMikeD:

@swissspidy since term IDs are now unique thanks to all the term splitting, why do we need $taxonomy in taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php?

I suggested it because of consistency.

First, there's already taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->slug}.php, so adding a template with the ID makes sense.

In the case of a slug it's needed because two terms in different taxonomies can have the same slug. This isn't true for IDs.

Second, this helps developers figuring out what's going on. For example, taxonomy-123.phpsounds like it's the template for a taxonomy with the ID 123. taxonomy-color-123.php is more obvious.

This is in direct opposition to how term splitting is being done, specifically how the taxonomy field is being stripped from term functions. Why the inconsistency? IMHO I think it's fair to expect developers to read the template docs to determine how they work without needing this type of hand holding.

Finally, when the taxonomy name can be left out, term-123.php would make more sense. But again, this would not be consistent with the existing templates.

If clarity is the goal, consider what we already have: category-{$category->term_id}.php tag-{$tag->term_id}.php

Using taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php or $taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php is more consistant with the category and tag template names than taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php

If consistency is the goal, IMHO you have two choices: category-{$category->term_id}.php tag-{$tag->term_id}.php $taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php or taxonomy-category-{$category->term_id}.php taxonomy-tag-{$tag->term_id}.php taxonomy-$taxonomy-{$term->term_id}.php

Or we can use term-{$term->term_id}.php, have it called after category-{$category->term_id}.php, tag-{$tag->term_id}.php in the hierarchy, and not only is this issue solved but we can look forward to eventually phasing out the category- and tag-specific templates and simplifying the hierarchy. All thanks to term splitting.