#60118 closed enhancement (fixed)
Add theme support for appearance tools
| Reported by: | isabel_brison | Owned by: | isabel_brison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 6.5 |
| Component: | Themes | Version: | 6.5 |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | gutenberg-merge has-patch has-unit-tests add-to-field-guide |
| Cc: | Focuses: |
Description
It should be possible for classic themes to opt in to appearance tools support, which enables a few design tools for blocks (complete list here: https://github.com/WordPress/wordpress-develop/blob/trunk/src/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json.php#L576)
Previously this was attempted in #57460, and then reverted in #57649 due to block gap support not working correctly. That issue has since been fixed (https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/pull/56130). Further small bugs are tracked in https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/issues/56131 and well on the way to being fixed.
This seems like a good time to give appearance tools support another try!
Change History (9)
This ticket was mentioned in PR #5813 on WordPress/wordpress-develop by @isabel_brison.
3 years ago
#1
- Keywords has-patch has-unit-tests added
@isabel_brison commented on PR #5813:
3 years ago
#2
Thanks for the reviews folks! All changes have been made.
@isabel_brison commented on PR #5813:
3 years ago
#4
Thanks for the reviews folks! Committed in r57255.
#6
follow-up:
↓ 7
@
3 years ago
Thanks for adding that @SergeyBiryukov! I wasn't aware of the list. Looks like it's missing border, block-templates and block-template-parts, possibly others too. Should the list be exhaustive? If so might be worth opening a ticket to make a full inventory.
#7
in reply to: ↑ 6
@
3 years ago
Replying to isabel_brison:
Should the list be exhaustive? If so might be worth opening a ticket to make a full inventory.
That would be great, yes :)
![(please configure the [header_logo] section in trac.ini)](/chrome/site/your_project_logo.png)
Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/60118
I just copied over the changes from #3846 as that patch was no longer applying cleanly.